journal article·2005-07

A two-dimensional microsegregation model for the description of microstructure formation during solidification in multicomponent alloys: Formulation and behaviour of the model

Q. Du, A. Jacot

Acta Materialia· Volume 53· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A new two-dimensional model for the simulation of microstructure formation and microsegregation during solidification of multicomponent alloys is presented. The model combines a direct simulation of the primary phase formation based on a previously published pseudo-front tracking method [Jacot A, Rappaz M. Acta Mater 2002;50:1909; Acta Mater 2002;50:3971] and a mixture approach for the description of the formation of secondary phases. A general formalism is proposed to describe the influence of back diffusion on the evolution of the type, amount and composition of the interdendritic phases. The model is coupled to the phase diagram software Thermo-Calc to obtain the phase equilibrium in the mixture and the concentrations to be prescribed at the primary phase/mixture interface. The model incorporates a parameter that permits distinguishing between coupled and divorced growth modes of eutectics. The difficulty of bridging grains that have different crystallographic orientations due to the grain boundary energy being larger than twice the solid/liquid interface energy is modelled phenomenologically by introducing a coalescence undercooling. The model is used to investigate the influence of the primary phase morphology on microsegregation and is compared with simpler one-dimensional approaches. The influence of impingement, coalescence, coarsening and grain size distribution is discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Jacot · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 190910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00442-6 ↗
2. Jacot · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 397110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00189-1 ↗
3. Warren · Acta Mater · 1995 · 43 · 68910.1016/0956-7151(94)00285-P ↗
4. Karma · Phys Rev E · 1998 · 57 · 432310.1103/PhysRevE.57.4323 ↗
5. Grafe · 2000 · 481
6. Boettinger · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 32 · 16310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
7. Chen · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 113
8. Saito · Phys Rev A · 1988 · 38 · 214810.1103/PhysRevA.38.2148 ↗
9. Juric · J Comp Phys · 1996 · 123 · 12710.1006/jcph.1996.0011 ↗
10. Dilthey · 1998 · 589
11. Sundman · CALPHAD · 1985 · 9 · 15310.1016/0364-5916(85)90021-5 ↗
12. Bale · CALPHAD · 2002 · 26 · 18910.1016/S0364-5916(02)00035-4 ↗
13. Kraft · J Metals · 1997 · 47 · 20
14. Voller · Metall Mater Trans A · 1999 · 30 · 218310.1007/s11661-999-0030-z ↗
15. Kraft · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1996 · 4 · 16110.1088/0965-0393/4/2/004 ↗
16. Yamada · 1990 · 618
17. Kattner · Z Metallkde · 1996 · 87 · 522
18. Dore · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 395110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00177-4 ↗
19. Borgenstam · J Phase Equil · 2000 · 21 · 26910.1361/105497100770340057 ↗
20. Kothe DB, Rider WJ, Mosso SJ, Brock JS. Internal report. Los Alamos Laboratories; 1996
21. Jie · Metall Mater Trans A · 2003 · 34 · 79910.1007/s11661-003-1008-x ↗
22. Mcdonald · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 427310.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.043 ↗
23. Rappaz · Metall Mater Trans A · 2003 · 34 · 46710.1007/s11661-003-0083-3 ↗
24. Ansara I, Dinsdale, Rand M. EUR000018171-COST507. In: Proceedings of the final workshop. Vaals (NL): EUR-OP Office for Publications, Luxembourg; 1998
25. Bakker · 1990
26. Brandes · 1992
27. Flemings · J Iron Steel Inst · 1970 · 208 · 371
28. Clyne · Metall Trans A · 1981 · 12 · 96510.1007/BF02643477 ↗