Modeling and predicting microstructure evolution in lead/tin alloy via correlation functions and stochastic material reconstruction
Source abstract
Abstract
The binary lead/tin (Pb/Sn) alloy is widely used as an interconnect in microelectronics. The physical properties of this heterogeneous material critically depend on its complex bulk microstructure containing Pb-rich and Sn-rich phases, which can be both laminar and globular. In this paper, we devise a procedure to model and predict the microstructure evolution (i.e. coarsening) in a Pb–Sn alloy aged at elevated temperatures below its melting point using statistical morphological descriptors, i.e. the two-point correlation functions S2 associated with the phases. We verify via phase-field simulations that the growing length scale characterizing microstructure coarsening can be well captured by the corresponding correlation functions, which enables us to predict the S2 of intermediate microstructures given the initial and final microstructures. Stochastic material reconstruction techniques are employed to generate virtual three-dimensional microstructures that are consistent with the predicted correlation functions, which are quantitatively compared with the actual alloy microstructures when available.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Torquato · 2002
2. Sahimi · 2003
3. Brandon · 1999
4. Manko · 2001
5. Sidhu · Metall Mater Trans · 2008 · 39A · 34010.1007/s11661-007-9414-0 ↗
6. Sidhu · Metall Mater Trans · 2009 · 39A · 349
7. Sidhu · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 162710.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.013 ↗
8. Porter · 2004
9. Cahn · J Chem Phys · 1958 · 28 · 25810.1063/1.1744102 ↗
10. Cahn · J Chem Phys · 1965 · 42 · 9310.1063/1.1695731 ↗
11. Bray · Adv Phys · 2002 · 51 · 48110.1080/00018730110117433 ↗
12. Emmerich · Adv Phys · 2008 · 57 · 110.1080/00018730701822522 ↗
13. Provatas · 2010
14. Thornton · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 567510.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.008 ↗
15. Thornton · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 135310.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.037 ↗
16. Lifshitz · J Phys Chem Solids · 1961 · 19 · 3510.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
17. Yeong · Phys Rev E · 1998 · 57 · 49510.1103/PhysRevE.57.495 ↗
18. Debye · J Appl Phys · 1957 · 28 · 67910.1063/1.1722830 ↗
19. Lu · Phys Rev A · 1992 · 45 · 92210.1103/PhysRevA.45.922 ↗
20. Fan · Phys Rev E · 2006 · 74 · 03160210.1103/PhysRevE.74.031602 ↗
21. Fan · J Chem Phys · 2010 · 133 · 23510110.1063/1.3518458 ↗
22. Jiao · Phys Rev E · 2007 · 76 · 03111010.1103/PhysRevE.76.031110 ↗
23. Niezgoda · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 528510.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.005 ↗
24. Kirkpatrick · Science · 1983 · 220 · 67110.1126/science.220.4598.671 ↗
25. Jiao · Phys Rev E · 2008 · 77 · 03113510.1103/PhysRevE.77.031135 ↗
26. Jiao · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2009 · 106 · 1763410.1073/pnas.0905919106 ↗
27. Gommes · Phys Rev Lett · 2012 · 108 · 08060110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.080601 ↗
28. Yazzie · Mater Charact · 2012 · 70 · 3310.1016/j.matchar.2012.05.004 ↗