journal article·2011-10Open access

Mechanical and microstructural integrity of nickel–titanium and stainless steel laser joined wires

J. Vannod, M. Bornert, J.-E. Bidaux, L. Bataillard, A. Karimi, J.-M. Drezet, M. Rappaz, A. Hessler-Wyser

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 17

Abstract

The biomedical industry shows increasing interest in the joining of dissimilar metals, especially with the aim of developing devices that combine different mechanical and corrosive properties. As an example, nickel–titanium shape memory alloys joined to stainless steel are very promising for new invasive surgery devices, such as guidewires. A fracture mechanics study of such joined wires was carried out using in situ tensile testing and scanning electron microscopy imaging combined with chemical analysis, and revealed an unusual fracture behaviour at superelastic stress. Nanoindentation was performed to determine the mechanical properties of the welded area, which were used as an input for mechanical computation in order to understand this unexpected behaviour. Automated image correlation allowed verification of the mechanical modelling and a reduced stress–strain model is proposed to explain the special fracture mechanism. This study reveals the fact that tremendous property changes at the interface between the NiTi base wire and the weld area have more impact on the ultimate tensile strength than the chemical composition variation across the welded area.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Duerig · Mater Sci Eng A · 1999 · 273–275 · 14910.1016/S0921-5093(99)00294-4 ↗
2. Hall PC. Method of welding titanium and titanium based alloys to ferrous metals. US 2004/0182835 A1; 2004.
3. Pelton · JOM · 2003 · 55 · 3310.1007/s11837-003-0243-3 ↗
4. Cacciamani · Intermetallics · 2006 · 14 · 131210.1016/j.intermet.2005.11.028 ↗
5. Kirkaldy · Can Metall Quart · 1963 · 2 · 8910.1179/cmq.1963.2.1.89 ↗
6. Uenishi K, Seki M, Kunimasa T, Takatsugu M, Kobayashi K, Ikeda T, et al. In: Proceedings of SPIE – the international society for optical engineering, vol. 4830; 2002. p. 57–62.10.1117/12.499698 ↗
7. Gugel · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 66810.1016/j.msea.2006.11.179 ↗
8. Favez D, Wagnière J-D, Rappaz M. In: ICALEO 2008 – 27th international congress on applications of lasers and electro-optics, Temecula, CA; 2008. p. 327–31.
9. Lee · Mater Trans · 2006 · 47 · 117810.2320/matertrans.47.1178 ↗
10. Borrisutthekul · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 467 · 10810.1016/j.msea.2007.03.049 ↗
11. Favez D. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; 2009.
12. Vannod J. Ph.D. thesis No. 5120, EPFL; 2011.
13. Oliver · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
14. Bornert · Strain · 2010 · 46 · 3310.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00590.x ↗
15. Allais · Acta Metallurgica Et Materialia · 1994 · 42 · 386510.1016/0956-7151(94)90452-9 ↗
16. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗