The performance of 1–3 piezoelectric composites with a porous non-piezoelectric matrix
Source abstract
Abstract
A micromechanics-based method is developed to evaluate the performance of 1–3 piezoelectric composites with a porous non-piezoelectric matrix. The classical Mori–Tanaka method is first used to analyze the porous polymer matrix, then the Mori–Tanaka method for piezoelectric composites is used to analyze the porous polymer matrix with embedded piezoceramic fibers. A parametric study is conducted to investigate the influence of the volume fraction, shape and orientation of the pores on the mechanical properties of the polymer matrix and the performance of the 1–3 piezoelectric composites. The results of the study show that the performance of the piezoelectric composites is significantly enhanced by the presence of pores in the matrix, particularly by cylindrical pores perpendicular to the piezoceramic fibers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Akdogan · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr · 2005 · 52 · 74610.1109/TUFFC.2005.1503962 ↗
2. Smith WA. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ultrasonics symposium; 1990. p. 757–69.
3. Smith · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr · 1993 · 40 · 4110.1109/58.184997 ↗
4. Smith · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr · 1991 · 38 · 4010.1109/58.67833 ↗
5. Smith WA, Shaulov AA, Auld BA. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ultrasonics symposium; 1985. p. 642–7.10.1109/ULTSYM.1985.198589 ↗
6. Chan · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr · 1989 · 36 · 43410.1109/58.31780 ↗
7. Ren · Sensor Actuat · 2006 · 128 · 13210.1016/j.sna.2006.01.002 ↗
8. Guinovart-Diaz · Mater Lett · 2001 · 48 · 9310.1016/S0167-577X(00)00285-8 ↗
9. Levassort · J Phys D: Appl Phys · 2000 · 33 · 206410.1088/0022-3727/33/16/319 ↗
10. Nan · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 88 · 41610.1063/1.373675 ↗
11. Kar-Gupta · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 109310.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.023 ↗
12. Jiang · Int J Sol Struct · 1999 · 36 · 270710.1016/S0020-7683(98)00125-5 ↗
13. Dunn · Proc Royal Soc London A · 1993 · 443 · 26510.1098/rspa.1993.0145 ↗
14. Dunn · Int J Sol Struct · 1993 · 30 · 16110.1016/0020-7683(93)90058-F ↗
15. Odegard · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 531510.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.037 ↗
16. Li · J Appl Phys · 1995 · 77 · 459510.1063/1.359424 ↗
17. Bennet · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr · 1997 · 44 · 56510.1109/58.658308 ↗
18. Pettermann · Int J Sol Struct · 2000 · 37 · 544710.1016/S0020-7683(99)00224-3 ↗
19. Kar-Gupta · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 98 · 054102-110.1063/1.2014933 ↗
20. Kar-Gupta · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 127510.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.042 ↗
21. Berger · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 412 · 5310.1016/j.msea.2005.08.035 ↗
22. Lenglet · J Acoust Soc Am · 2003 · 113 · 82610.1121/1.1537710 ↗
23. Avellaneda · J Acoust Soc Am · 1998 · 103 · 144910.1121/1.421306 ↗
24. Gibiansky · J Mech Phys Sol · 1997 · 45 · 68910.1016/S0022-5096(96)00106-8 ↗
25. Kar-Gupta · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 406310.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.037 ↗
26. Mura · 1987
27. Qu · 2006
28. Taya · 2005
29. Barnett · Phys Status Solidi B · 1975 · 67 · 10510.1002/pssb.2220670108 ↗