journal article·2026-07-03

Electrochemical transport and interfacial Chemistry of MoO 2 –ordered mesoporous carbon nanocomposites for lithium-ion batteries

Farag M. A. Altalbawy, I. B. Sapaev, Fadel F. Saied, Paul Rodrigues, Rekha M. M., Laxmidhar Maharana, P. Grace Kanmani Prince, Gaganjot Kaur, Malik Bader Alazzam, Amir Arsalanirad

Composite Interfaces· Volume 33· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The development of high-performance electrode materials depends critically on interfacial interactions and adhesion phenomena at the nanoscale. In this study, molybdenum dioxide – ordered mesoporous carbon (MoO2–OMC) nanocomposites were investigated through validated multiphysics simulations to elucidate the coupled effects of ion transport, interfacial electrochemistry, and structural stability. The ordered mesoporous carbon framework, with uniform ~4.5 nm channels and high surface area, anchors MoO2 nanoparticles via oxygen-containing functional groups (e.g. hydroxyl, carbonyl), forming weak chemical bonds that prevent aggregation and improve interfacial adhesion by reducing nanoparticle mobility. This anchoring promotes stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation through preferential adsorption of electrolyte decomposition products, resulting in improved lithium-ion accessibility (via 4.5 nm pores) and charge transfer kinetics (e.g. reducing resistance to 50–108 Ω.cm2 as per EIS simulations. By systematically varying electrode thickness (10–150 µm) and MoO2:OMC mass ratios (20:80 to 80:20), the study identifies the 50:50 composition as optimal, delivering superior reversible capacity, low charge transfer resistance, and long-term cycling durability. The novelty of this work lies in integrating pore-scale transport dynamics (modeled via Navier – Stokes and Nernst – Planck equations) with surface chemistry and interfacial adhesion mechanisms, offering a framework for designing nanostructured composites with optimized electrochemical performance (e.g. 95.5% capacity retention at 50:50 ratio) and mechanical integrity. These insights extend beyond energy storage applications, demonstrating the role of interfacial engineering in advanced nanomaterials through a reduced charge transfer resistance (50–108 Ω.cm2).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Tabuk

National Research University

Scientific Researcher of the University of Tashkent for Applied Science

Central Asian University

Western Caspian University, Scientific Researcher

The Islamic University

King Khalid University

JAIN (Deemed to be University)

Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)

Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology

Chandigarh University

Jadara University

Medical College of Tehran University

Funding

King Khalid University

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aenm.20210156510.1002/aenm.202101565 ↗
2. 10.1039/D0QI00929F10.1039/D0QI00929F ↗
3. Du Y, Huang Z, Yu M, et al. Rich oxygen vacancies promotes MoO2/N-doped carbon nanoribbons for high-performance sodium/potassium-ion batteries. J Electroceram. 2025;25(2):1–1.
4. 10.1016/j.nwnano.2023.10000410.1016/j.nwnano.2023.100004 ↗
5. 10.1002/asia.20230110710.1002/asia.202301107 ↗
6. Yuan S, Gao Q, Ke C, et al. Mesoporous carbon materials for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Chem Electro Chem. 2022;9(6):e202101182.
7. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac316110.1149/1945-7111/ac3161 ↗
8. 10.1039/C7CS00787F10.1039/C7CS00787F ↗
9. 10.20517/energymater.2023.8110.20517/energymater.2023.81 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.3c0434110.1021/acsami.3c04341 ↗
11. 10.1002/advs.20230104510.1002/advs.202301045 ↗
12. 10.5796/electrochemistry.21-0008410.5796/electrochemistry.21-00084 ↗
13. 10.1007/s41918-022-00147-510.1007/s41918-022-00147-5 ↗
14. George NS, Jose LM, Aravind A. Review on transition metal oxides and their composites for energy storage application. In: Stević Z, editor. Updates on supercapacitors. IntechOpen; 2022. p. 1–23.
15. 10.1002/adfm.20240558610.1002/adfm.202405586 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.406601910.1115/1.4066019 ↗
17. 10.34133/energymatadv.001510.34133/energymatadv.0015 ↗
18. Saha A Eskender SB. Characteristics of a nickel vanadium redox flow battery based on COMSOL. 2022.
19. 10.1039/D1NR06280H10.1039/D1NR06280H ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10734210.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107342 ↗
21. 10.1002/celc.20210009810.1002/celc.202100098 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10694-022-01349-510.1007/s10694-022-01349-5 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20210267810.1002/aenm.202102678 ↗
24. 10.1007/s42114-021-00358-210.1007/s42114-021-00358-2 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1872-5805(21)60022-710.1016/S1872-5805(21)60022-7 ↗
26. 10.1557/s43578-023-01070-110.1557/s43578-023-01070-1 ↗
27. 10.1680/jsuin.20.0004410.1680/jsuin.20.00044 ↗
28. Roseline SN, Nithyananda S, Senthil K. Recent developments in doped TMO and TMO-based composites for energy harvesting and pollutant removal systems. In: Mishra YK, Lingamallu G, Ghosh T, editors. 2nd International Conference on Advanced Nanomaterials and Applications, Amaravati, India, vol. 413; 2024. p. 109–124.
29. 10.1039/D3TA01230A10.1039/D3TA01230A ↗
30. 10.1039/D3CS00572K10.1039/D3CS00572K ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.01.03010.1016/j.jcis.2023.01.030 ↗
32. 10.3390/pr1209187110.3390/pr12091871 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-024-48779-z10.1038/s41467-024-48779-z ↗
34. 10.1021/am303286n10.1021/am303286n ↗
35. 10.3390/en1615582310.3390/en16155823 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.est.2023.11005010.1016/j.est.2023.110050 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0015510.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00155 ↗
38. 10.1016/0899-8248(90)90004-T10.1016/0899-8248(90)90004-T ↗
39. 10.1016/S0006-3495(65)86707-810.1016/S0006-3495(65)86707-8 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.17410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.174 ↗
41. 10.1134/S102319351206011010.1134/S1023193512060110 ↗
42. Du Y, Huang Z, Yu M, et al. Rich oxygen vacancies promotes MoO2/N-doped carbon nanoribbons for high-performance sodium/potassium-ion batteries. J Electroceram. 2025;25(2):1–1.
43. 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.10461110.1016/j.ensm.2025.104611 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15341810.1016/j.cej.2024.153418 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cplett.2023.14099410.1016/j.cplett.2023.140994 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2024.11825710.1016/j.jelechem.2024.118257 ↗