Improved fatigue properties of ultrafine-grained copper under cyclic torsion loading
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, fatigue behaviors of pure copper with different grain sizes are investigated under cyclic tension–compression and torsion loadings. The fatigue responses of ultrafine-grained (UFG) Cu subjected to equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) are compared and contrasted with those of coarse-grained (CG) and cold-rolled (CR) Cu. It is found from the S–N curves under the two different loading modes that, in the high-cycle fatigue (HCF) range, the fatigue strength of Cu does not exhibit strong dependence on the grain size under cyclic tension–compression loading, whereas the fatigue strength of UFG Cu is greatly improved over those of CG and CR Cu under cyclic torsion loading. Under cyclic tension–compression loading, the fatigue strength exponent decreases with the refinement of grain size; however, under cyclic torsion loading, with decreasing grain size, its fatigue strength exponent shows the opposite trend and goes up. To explain the phenomena above, the relations between the fatigue strength exponent and fatigue strength coefficient are discussed. Based on the two main stages of fatigue failure (crack initiation and propagation stages), the influences of grain size on fatigue strength exponent and fatigue strength in the HCF range under the two fatigue modes are comprehensively analyzed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Rubitschek · J Alloys Compd · 2012 · 517 · 6110.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.150 ↗
2. Meyers · Prog Mater Sci · 2006 · 51 · 42710.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
3. Zhao · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 458910.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.017 ↗
4. Valiev · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 168 · 14110.1016/0921-5093(93)90717-S ↗
5. Mughrabi · Int J Fatigue · 2010 · 32 · 141310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.10.007 ↗
6. Valiev · Prog Mater Sci · 2000 · 45 · 10310.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
7. Furukawa · J Mater Sci · 2001 · 36 · 283510.1023/A:1017932417043 ↗
8. Mughrabi · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 80710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.012 ↗
9. Sitarama Raju · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 22810.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.053 ↗
10. Zhao · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52
11. Lugo · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 477 · 36610.1016/j.msea.2007.05.083 ↗
12. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
13. An · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 66 · 22710.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.043 ↗
14. Zhang · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 87110.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.07.040 ↗
15. Wang · J Alloys Compd · 2012 · 526 · 3910.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.102 ↗
16. Patlan · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 300 · 17110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01682-8 ↗
17. Hanlon · Int J Fatigue · 2005 · 27 · 114710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.035 ↗
18. Vinogradov · Mater Trans · 2001 · 42 · 7410.2320/matertrans.42.74 ↗
19. Zhang · Scripta Mater · 2013 · 68 · 38910.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.10.036 ↗
20. Roland · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 194910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.049 ↗
21. Iwahashi · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 331710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00494-1 ↗
22. Figueroa · Mater Sci Eng A · 1983 · 60 · 4510.1016/0025-5416(83)90076-9 ↗
23. Mughrabi · Mater Sci Eng · 1978 · 33 · 20710.1016/0025-5416(78)90174-X ↗
24. Swearengen · Acta Metall · 1971 · 19 · 54310.1016/0001-6160(71)90007-1 ↗
25. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 34710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00399-3 ↗
26. Iwahashi · Scripta Mater · 1996 · 35 · 14310.1016/1359-6462(96)00107-8 ↗
27. Nadai · 1950
28. Kim · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 174510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.042 ↗
29. Goto · Int J Fatigue · 2008 · 30 · 133310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.11.001 ↗
30. Khatibi · Int J Fatigue · 2010 · 32 · 26910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.017 ↗
31. Thompson · Acta Metall · 1971 · 19 · 59710.1016/0001-6160(71)90012-5 ↗
32. Li · Mater Sci Eng A · 2013 · 574 · 11310.1016/j.msea.2013.03.020 ↗
33. Li · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 32810.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.001 ↗
34. Vinogradov · Scripta Mater · 1997 · 36 · 134510.1016/S1359-6462(97)00023-7 ↗
35. Agnew · Mater Sci Eng A · 1998 · 244 · 14510.1016/S0921-5093(97)00689-8 ↗
36. Agnew · J Electron Mater · 1999 · 28 · 103810.1007/s11664-999-0181-0 ↗
37. Hoppel · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 178110.1080/01418610208235689 ↗
38. Zhang · Philos Mag · 2011 · 91 · 23710.1080/09500839.2010.539989 ↗
39. Wu · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 48 · 160510.1016/S1359-6462(03)00141-6 ↗
40. Goto · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 210110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.03.001 ↗
41. Chung · Mater Sci Eng A · 2002 · 337 · 3910.1016/S0921-5093(02)00010-2 ↗
42. Vinogradov · J Mater Sci · 2007 · 42 · 179710.1007/s10853-006-0973-z ↗
43. Vinogradov · Mater Trans · 2012 · 53 · 10110.2320/matertrans.MD201123 ↗
44. Hubner · Int J Mater Res · 2006 · 97 · 156610.3139/146.101422 ↗
45. Hubner · Metall Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38A · 192610.1007/s11661-007-9297-0 ↗
46. Vinogradov · Nanostruct Mater · 1999 · 11 · 92510.1016/S0965-9773(99)00392-X ↗
47. Estrin · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 78210.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.038 ↗
48. Zhang · Prog Mater Sci · 2008 · 36 · 102510.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.001 ↗
49. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 311310.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.016 ↗
50. J Appl Mech, Trans ASME
51. Murakami · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2003 · 26 · 52310.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00644.x ↗
52. Murakami · Eng Fract Mech · 2008 · 75 · 30610.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.01.030 ↗