journal article·2010-04

The deformation of Gum Metal through in situ compression of nanopillars

E.A. Withey, A.M. Minor, D.C. Chrzan, J.W. Morris, S. Kuramoto

Acta Materialia· Volume 58· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The name “Gum Metal” has been given to a set of β-Ti alloys that achieve exceptional elastic elongation and, with appropriate preparation, appear to deform by a dislocation-free mechanism triggered by elastic instability at the limit of strength. We have studied the compressive deformation of these materials with in situ nanocompression in a quantitative stage in a transmission electron microscope. The samples studied are cylindrical nanopillars 80–250 nm in diameter. The deformation pattern is monitored in real time using bright-field microscopy, dark-field microscopy or electron diffraction. Interesting results include the following: (i) nanopillars approach, and in several examples appear to reach, ideal strength; (ii) in contrast to conventional crystalline materials, there is no substantial “size effect” in pillar strength; (iii) the deformation mode is fine-scale with respect to the sample dimension, even in pillars of 100 nm size; (iv) shear bands (“giant faults”) do form in some tests, but only after yield and plastic deformation; and (v) a martensitic transformation to the base-centered orthorhombic α′′ phase is sometimes observed, but is an incidental feature of the deformation rather than a significant cause of it.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Saito · Science · 2003 · 300 · 46410.1126/science.1081957 ↗
2. Morris · 2000 · 187
3. Roundy · Philos Mag A · 2001 · 81 · 172510.1080/01418610108216634 ↗
4. Krenn · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · A319–A321 · 11110.1016/S0921-5093(01)00998-4 ↗
5. Gutkin · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 248910.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.027 ↗
6. Li · Phys Rev Lett · 2007 · 98 · 10550310.1103/PhysRevLett.98.105503 ↗
7. Withey · Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · A493 · 2610.1016/j.msea.2007.07.097 ↗
8. Talling · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 118810.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.013 ↗
9. Yano · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 62810.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.002 ↗
10. Takesue · J Cryst Growth · 2009 · 311 · 331910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.03.052 ↗
11. Withey · Exp Mech · 2010 · 5010.1007/s11340-008-9210-9 ↗
12. Shan · Nature Mater · 2008 · 7 · 11510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
13. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
14. Greer · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 182110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031 ↗
15. Minor AM · Appl Phys Lett · 2001 · 79 · 62510.1063/1.1400768 ↗
16. Minor · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 17610.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.176 ↗
17. Furuta · 2003 · 1519
18. Zhang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 18110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.043 ↗
19. Shuster · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 509110.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.028 ↗
20. Dimiduk · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 406510.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.023 ↗
21. Volkert · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 556710.1080/14786430600567739 ↗
22. Lee · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 440410.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.002 ↗
23. Bei · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 39710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.05.010 ↗
24. Kuramoto S, Hatashi Y, Hara M. Acta Mater, in press.