Curvature of micropores in Al–Cu alloys: An X-ray tomography study
Source abstract
Abstract
Micropores formed in Al–Cu alloys cast under controlled conditions have been analyzed using high-resolution X-ray tomography. The influence of inoculation conditions, copper content, cooling rate and initial hydrogen content on the morphology of pores has been investigated. Based on the three-dimensional reconstructed shape of the pores, the distribution of curvature was estimated. It is shown that the mean curvature of pores in either non-inoculated or inoculated Al–4.5 wt.%Cu alloys can be as large as 0.35 μm−1 near the end of solidification and can be fairly well approximated by a set of interconnected cylinders growing in between the primary phase dendrites. The so-called “pinching” effect, i.e. the restriction of the pore curvature by the solid network, is a function of the volume fraction of the primary phase and of the secondary dendrite arm spacing. If the fraction of porosity is highly dependent on the initial hydrogen content, the curvature itself is only weakly influenced by this parameter. Based on these results, it is concluded that curvature plays a major role in porosity models and that the analytical pinching model developed by Couturier et al. offers a fairly good and simple approximation of this contribution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Couturier · 2006 · 143
2. Campbell · 2003
3. Dantzig · 2009
4. Lee · J Light Met · 2001 · 1 · 1510.1016/S1471-5317(00)00003-1 ↗
5. Carlson · Metall Mater Trans B · 2007 · 38 · 54110.1007/s11663-006-9013-2 ↗
6. Felberbaum · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 230210.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.022 ↗
7. Carpentier D. PhD thesis. INPL Nancy; 1994.
8. Poirier · Metall Trans A · 1987 · 18 · 197910.1007/BF02647028 ↗
9. Péquet · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33 · 209510.1007/s11661-002-0041-5 ↗
10. Baruchel · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 4110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.012 ↗
11. Mathiesen · Metall Mater Trans B · 2002 · 33 · 61310.1007/s11663-002-0041-2 ↗
12. Wang · Int J Cast Metal Res · 2007 · 20 · 15110.1179/136404607X240580 ↗
13. Lee · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 415510.1016/S1359-6454(97)00081-5 ↗
14. Limodin · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 230010.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.035 ↗
15. Terzi · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 44910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.04.041 ↗
16. Piwonka · Trans AIME · 1966 · 236 · 1157
17. Couturier · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2006 · 14 · 25310.1088/0965-0393/14/2/009 ↗
18. Anyalebechi · 2003 · 857
19. Sigworth · Metall Mater Trans B · 1982 · 13 · 44710.1007/BF02667761 ↗
20. Kammer · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 154910.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.031 ↗
21. Felberbaum M. PhD thesis. EFPL Lausanne; 2010.
22. Zhao · Int J Cast Metal Res · 2008 · 21 · 31310.1179/136404608X362160 ↗
23. Apprill · Mater Res Soc Proc · 1998 · 521 · 29110.1557/PROC-521-291 ↗
24. Fredriksson · Metall Mater Trans B · 1976 · 7 · 59910.1007/BF02698593 ↗
25. Drezet · Metall Mater Trans A · 2000 · 31 · 162710.1007/s11661-000-0172-5 ↗
26. Salvo · Nucl Instrum Method Phys Res B · 2003 · 200 · 27310.1016/S0168-583X(02)01689-0 ↗
27. Maire · Adv Eng Mater · 2001 · 3 · 53910.1002/1527-2648(200108)3:8<539::AID-ADEM539>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
28. Kak · 1987
29. http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/index.html.
30. Doube · PLoS ONE · 2009 · 4 · 474210.1371/journal.pone.0004742 ↗
31. Andrew · 2001
32. Clyne · Metall Mater Trans A · 1981 · 12 · 96510.1007/BF02643477 ↗