Grain boundary excess volume and defect annealing of copper after high-pressure torsion
Source abstract
Abstract
The release of excess volume upon recrystallization of ultrafine-grained Cu deformed by high-pressure torsion (HPT) was studied by means of the direct technique of high-precision difference dilatometry in combination with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and scanning electron microscopy. From the length change associated with the removal of grain boundaries in the wake of crystallite growth, a structural key quantity of grain boundaries, the grain boundary excess volume or expansion [Formula: see text] m was directly determined. The value is quite similar to that measured by dilatometry for grain boundaries in HPT-deformed Ni. Activation energies for crystallite growth of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are derived by Kissinger analysis from dilatometry and DSC data, respectively. In contrast to Ni, substantial length change proceeds in Cu at elevated temperatures beyond the regime of dominant crystallite growth. In the light of recent findings from tracer diffusion and permeation experiments, this is associated with the shrinkage of nanovoids at high temperatures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Valiev · Prog Mater Sci · 2000 · 45 · 10310.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
2. 2004
3. Koch · 2007
4. 2009
5. Oberdorfer · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 45210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.007 ↗
6. Setman · Mech Mater · 2013 · 67 · 5910.1016/j.mechmat.2013.07.007 ↗
7. Divinski · Adv Eng Mater · 2010 · 12 · 77910.1002/adem.200900340 ↗
8. Divinski · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 197410.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.063 ↗
9. Steyskal · Phys Rev Lett · 2012 · 108 · 05550410.1103/PhysRevLett.108.055504 ↗
10. Pippan · Mater Sci Forum · 2008 · 584–586 · 1610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.584-586.16 ↗
11. Pippan · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2010 · 40 · 21010.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104445 ↗
12. Sprengel · J Mater Sci · 2012 · 47 · 792110.1007/s10853-012-6460-9 ↗
13. Setman · Metall Mater Trans A · 2010 · 41 · 81010.1007/s11661-009-0058-0 ↗
14. Abramoff · Biophotonic Int · 2004 · 11 · 36
15. Oberdorfer · J Alloy Compd · 2011 · 509S · S30910.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.130 ↗
16. Amouyal · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 668110.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.023 ↗
17. Oberdorfer · 2012
18. Čiček · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 09410610.1103/PhysRevB.65.094106 ↗
19. Cao · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 492 · 7410.1016/j.msea.2008.02.048 ↗
20. Molodova · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 460–461 · 20410.1016/j.msea.2007.01.042 ↗
21. Amouyal · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 550010.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.029 ↗
22. Merkle · Ultramicroscopy · 1992 · 40 · 28110.1016/0304-3991(92)90125-4 ↗
23. Buckett · Ultramicroscopy · 1994 · 56 · 7110.1016/0304-3991(94)90147-3 ↗
24. Shvindlerman · J Mater Sci · 2006 · 41 · 772510.1007/s10853-006-0563-0 ↗
25. Birringer · Philos Mag Lett · 1995 · 72 · 7110.1080/09500839508241616 ↗
26. Krill · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 86 · 84210.1103/PhysRevLett.86.842 ↗
27. Wolf · Scripta Metall · 1989 · 23 · 191310.1016/0036-9748(89)90482-1 ↗
28. Wolf · Philos Mag A · 1990 · 62 · 44710.1080/01418619008244790 ↗
29. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 62310.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.001 ↗
30. Olmsted · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 369410.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007 ↗
31. Estrin · Scripta Mater · 2000 · 43 · 14110.1016/S1359-6462(00)00383-3 ↗
32. Wycisk · J Nucl Mater · 1978 · 69–70 · 61610.1016/0022-3115(78)90293-3 ↗
33. Bourassa · J Phys F · 1976 · 6 · 140510.1088/0305-4608/6/8/003 ↗
34. Bowden · Philos Mag · 1969 · 19 · 100110.1080/14786436908225865 ↗
35. Lapovok · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 290910.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.042 ↗
36. Wegner · Mater Sci Forum · 2012 · 702–703 · 105
37. Divinski · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 570610.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.066 ↗