Formation of oxide nanotubes via oxidation of Fe, Cu and Ni nanowires and their structural stability: Difference in formation and shrinkage behavior of interior pores
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Changes in the morphology of Fe, Cu and Ni nanowires with a diameter of 55 nm during oxidation at 423–923 K were studied by transmission electron microscopy. Oxide nanotubes with a cylindrical interior pore of uniform diameter were formed after the oxidation of Fe and Cu nanowires in air at 573 and 423 K, respectively, while the Ni nanowires became bamboo-like nanowires of NiO with separate interior voids after oxidation at 673–773 K. Oxide nanotubes of Fe and Cu and the bamboo structures of NiO showed a tendency to shrink into solid oxide nanowires after annealing at higher temperatures in air. In the shrinking process of Fe 3 O 4 nanotubes, however, an array of additional nanovoids was observed along the inner wall of the nanotubes, suggesting the formation of a duplex porous nanostructure. This can be explained by the recombination of vacancies diffusing outward from the inner cylindrical pore.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Xia · MRS Bull · 2005 · 30 · 35610.1557/mrs2005.96 ↗
2. Fan · Small · 2007 · 3 · 166010.1002/smll.200700382 ↗
3. Smigelskas · Trans AIME · 1947 · 171 · 130
4. Yin · Science · 2004 · 304 · 71110.1126/science.1096566 ↗
5. Fan · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 62710.1038/nmat1673 ↗
6. Nakamura · Mater Lett · 2007 · 61 · 106010.1016/j.matlet.2006.06.039 ↗
7. Nakamura · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 101 · 07430310.1063/1.2711383 ↗
8. Nakamura · Philos Mag · 2008 · 88 · 25710.1080/14786430701819203 ↗
9. Wang · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 98 · 09430810.1063/1.2130890 ↗
10. Cabot · J Am Chem Soc · 2007 · 129 · 1035810.1021/ja072574a ↗
11. Peng · Angew Chem Int Ed · 2007 · 46 · 415510.1002/anie.200700677 ↗
12. Nakamura · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 426110.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.023 ↗
13. Lu · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 04560510.1088/0957-4484/19/04/045605 ↗
14. Fan · Nano Lett · 2007 · 7 · 99310.1021/nl070026p ↗
15. Tu · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 86 · 09311110.1063/1.1873044 ↗
16. Gusak · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 444510.1080/14786430500311741 ↗
17. Evteev · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 378710.1080/14786430601103005 ↗
18. Fischer · Nanoparticle Res · 2008 · 10 · 25510.1007/s11051-007-9242-6 ↗
19. Nakamura · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 527610.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.004 ↗
20. Tian · Nano Lett · 2003 · 3 · 91910.1021/nl034217d ↗
21. Konishi · J Electroanal Chem · 2003 · 559 · 14910.1016/S0022-0728(03)00157-8 ↗
22. Atkinson · J Mater Sci · 1983 · 18 · 237110.1007/BF00541841 ↗
23. Castle · J Phys Chem · 1967 · 71 · 425510.1021/j100872a015 ↗
24. Sato · Jpn J Appl Phys · 1991 · 30 · L48910.1143/JJAP.30.L489 ↗
25. Yasuda · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 10550610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.105506 ↗