journal article·2009-10

Formation of oxide nanotubes via oxidation of Fe, Cu and Ni nanowires and their structural stability: Difference in formation and shrinkage behavior of interior pores

R. Nakamura, G. Matsubayashi, H. Tsuchiya, S. Fujimoto, H. Nakajima

Acta Materialia· Volume 57· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Changes in the morphology of Fe, Cu and Ni nanowires with a diameter of 55 nm during oxidation at 423–923 K were studied by transmission electron microscopy. Oxide nanotubes with a cylindrical interior pore of uniform diameter were formed after the oxidation of Fe and Cu nanowires in air at 573 and 423 K, respectively, while the Ni nanowires became bamboo-like nanowires of NiO with separate interior voids after oxidation at 673–773 K. Oxide nanotubes of Fe and Cu and the bamboo structures of NiO showed a tendency to shrink into solid oxide nanowires after annealing at higher temperatures in air. In the shrinking process of Fe 3 O 4 nanotubes, however, an array of additional nanovoids was observed along the inner wall of the nanotubes, suggesting the formation of a duplex porous nanostructure. This can be explained by the recombination of vacancies diffusing outward from the inner cylindrical pore.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Xia · MRS Bull · 2005 · 30 · 35610.1557/mrs2005.96 ↗
2. Fan · Small · 2007 · 3 · 166010.1002/smll.200700382 ↗
3. Smigelskas · Trans AIME · 1947 · 171 · 130
4. Yin · Science · 2004 · 304 · 71110.1126/science.1096566 ↗
5. Fan · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 62710.1038/nmat1673 ↗
6. Nakamura · Mater Lett · 2007 · 61 · 106010.1016/j.matlet.2006.06.039 ↗
7. Nakamura · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 101 · 07430310.1063/1.2711383 ↗
8. Nakamura · Philos Mag · 2008 · 88 · 25710.1080/14786430701819203 ↗
9. Wang · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 98 · 09430810.1063/1.2130890 ↗
10. Cabot · J Am Chem Soc · 2007 · 129 · 1035810.1021/ja072574a ↗
11. Peng · Angew Chem Int Ed · 2007 · 46 · 415510.1002/anie.200700677 ↗
12. Nakamura · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 426110.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.023 ↗
13. Lu · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 04560510.1088/0957-4484/19/04/045605 ↗
14. Fan · Nano Lett · 2007 · 7 · 99310.1021/nl070026p ↗
15. Tu · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 86 · 09311110.1063/1.1873044 ↗
16. Gusak · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 444510.1080/14786430500311741 ↗
17. Evteev · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 378710.1080/14786430601103005 ↗
18. Fischer · Nanoparticle Res · 2008 · 10 · 25510.1007/s11051-007-9242-6 ↗
19. Nakamura · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 527610.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.004 ↗
20. Tian · Nano Lett · 2003 · 3 · 91910.1021/nl034217d ↗
21. Konishi · J Electroanal Chem · 2003 · 559 · 14910.1016/S0022-0728(03)00157-8 ↗
22. Atkinson · J Mater Sci · 1983 · 18 · 237110.1007/BF00541841 ↗
23. Castle · J Phys Chem · 1967 · 71 · 425510.1021/j100872a015 ↗
24. Sato · Jpn J Appl Phys · 1991 · 30 · L48910.1143/JJAP.30.L489 ↗
25. Yasuda · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 10550610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.105506 ↗