journal article·2014-07

Flaw tolerance vs. performance: A tradeoff in metallic glass cellular structures

Wen Chen, Ze Liu, Hannah Mae Robinson, Jan Schroers

Acta Materialia· Volume 73
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Stochastic cellular structures are prevalent in nature and engineering materials alike. They are difficult to manipulate and study systematically and almost always contain imperfections. To design and characterize various degrees of imperfections in perfect periodic, stochastic and natural cellular structures, we fabricate a broad range of metallic glass cellular structures from perfectly periodic to highly stochastic by using a novel artificial microstructure approach based on thermoplastic replication of metallic glasses. For these cellular structures, precisely controlled imperfections are implemented and their effects on the mechanical response are evaluated. It is found that the mechanical performance of the periodic structures is generally superior to that of the stochastic structures. However, the stochastic structures experience a much higher tolerance to flaws than the periodic structure, especially in the plastic regime. The different flaw tolerance is explained by the stress distribution within the various structures, which leads to an overall "strain-hardening" behavior of the stochastic structure compared to a "strain-softening" behavior in the periodic structure. Our findings reveal how structure, "strain-hardening" and flaw tolerance are microscopically related in structural materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Launey · Adv Mater · 2009 · 21 · 210310.1002/adma.200803322 ↗
2. Simon · Science · 2010 · 327 · 6010.1126/science.1183226 ↗
3. Zhou · Nano Lett · 2012 · 12 · 592910.1021/nl3033558 ↗
4. Pandey · Nat Nanotechnol · 2012 · 7 · 79210.1038/nnano.2012.210 ↗
5. Banhart · Prog Mater Sci · 2001 · 46 · 55910.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
6. Evans · Prog Mater Sci · 2001 · 46 · 30910.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-5 ↗
7. Gibson · 2001
8. Ajdari · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 487 · 55810.1016/j.msea.2007.10.050 ↗
9. Chen · J Mech Phys Solids · 1999 · 47 · 223510.1016/S0022-5096(99)00030-7 ↗
10. Papka · J Mech Phys Solids · 1994 · 42 · 149910.1016/0022-5096(94)90085-X ↗
11. Ruffoni · Philos Mag · 2010 · 90 · 180710.1080/14786430903571404 ↗
12. Silva · Int J Mech Sci · 1997 · 39 · 54910.1016/S0020-7403(96)00065-3 ↗
13. Symons · J Appl Mech · 2008 · 75 · 05101110.1115/1.2913044 ↗
14. Wang · Int J Mech Sci · 2003 · 45 · 179910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.12.007 ↗
15. Gibson · Mater Sci Eng A · 1989 · 110 · 110.1016/0921-5093(89)90154-8 ↗
16. Warren · J Mech Phys Solids · 1989 · 37 · 71710.1016/0022-5096(89)90015-X ↗
17. Greer · Science · 1995 · 267 · 194710.1126/science.267.5206.1947 ↗
18. Johnson · MRS Bull · 1999 · 24 · 4210.1557/S0883769400053252 ↗
19. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
20. Wang · Mater Sci Eng R · 2004 · 44 · 4510.1016/j.mser.2004.03.001 ↗
21. Cheng · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 13411510.1103/PhysRevB.80.134115 ↗
22. Kumar · Adv Mater · 2011 · 23 · 46110.1002/adma.201002148 ↗
23. Volkert · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 103 · 08353910.1063/1.2884584 ↗
24. Designing tensile ductility in metallic glasses10.1038/ncomms3158 ↗
25. Conner · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 94 · 90410.1063/1.1582555 ↗
26. Guo · Nat Mater · 2007 · 6 · 73510.1038/nmat1984 ↗
27. Demetriou · Adv Mater · 2007 · 19 · 195710.1002/adma.200602136 ↗
28. Schroers · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 82 · 37010.1063/1.1537514 ↗
29. Schroers · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 96 · 772310.1063/1.1818355 ↗
30. Brothers · Scr Mater · 2005 · 52 · 33510.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.10.002 ↗
31. Brothers · Adv Mater · 2005 · 17 · 48410.1002/adma.200400897 ↗
32. Hofmann · Nature · 2008 · 451 · 108510.1038/nature06598 ↗
33. Debenedetti · Nature · 2001 · 410 · 25910.1038/35065704 ↗
34. Critical fictive temperature for plasticity in metallic glasses10.1038/ncomms2546 ↗
35. Kumar · Scr Mater · 2011 · 65 · 58510.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.029 ↗
36. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 357210.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.016 ↗
37. Murali · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 146710.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.040 ↗
38. Gilbert · Appl Phys Lett · 1997 · 71 · 47610.1063/1.119610 ↗
39. Schroers · Adv Mater · 2010 · 22 · 156610.1002/adma.200902776 ↗
40. Zheng · Int J Impact Eng · 2005 · 32 · 65010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.05.007 ↗
41. Zhu · Int J Solids Struct · 2006 · 43 · 106110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.008 ↗
42. Florescu · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2009 · 106 · 2065810.1073/pnas.0907744106 ↗
43. Noh · Opt Lett · 2011 · 36 · 356010.1364/OL.36.003560 ↗
44. Kumar · Nature · 2009 · 457 · 86810.1038/nature07718 ↗
45. Schroers · Phys Today · 2013 · 66 · 3210.1063/PT.3.1885 ↗
46. Schroers · Mater Today · 2011 · 14 · 1410.1016/S1369-7021(11)70018-9 ↗
47. Li · J Cell Plast · 2006 · 42 · 37110.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗
48. Ott · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 188310.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.037 ↗
49. Duan · Adv Mater · 2007 · 19 · 427210.1002/adma.200700969 ↗
50. Silva · Int J Mech Sci · 1995 · 37 · 116110.1016/0020-7403(94)00018-F ↗
51. Spaepen · Acta Metall · 1975 · 23 · 61510.1016/0001-6160(75)90102-9 ↗
52. Sarac · Adv Funct Mater · 2012 · 22 · 316110.1002/adfm.201200539 ↗
53. Nishida · Ann Missouri Bot Gard · 2011 · 98 · 34810.3417/2010054 ↗
54. Gao · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2003 · 100 · 559710.1073/pnas.0631609100 ↗
55. Yao · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 112010.1016/j.jmps.2006.01.002 ↗
56. Gao · Int J Fract · 2006 · 138 · 10110.1007/s10704-006-7156-4 ↗
57. Gao · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2004 · 101 · 785110.1073/pnas.0400757101 ↗
58. Munch · Science · 2008 · 322 · 151610.1126/science.1164865 ↗