journal article·2009-09

Molecular-dynamics-based cohesive zone law for brittle interfacial fracture under mixed loading conditions: Effects of elastic constant mismatch

X.W. Zhou, N.R. Moody, R.E. Jones, J.A. Zimmerman, E.D. Reedy

Acta Materialia· Volume 57· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract One approach for performing a finite-element simulation of interfacial fracture is to use a cohesive zone model. The cohesive zone model defines the interfacial traction–separation relation. Experimental determination of such a relation has been difficult. Most previous work has been confined to tensile loading, and much less has been devoted to mixed-mode loading conditions. Even so, specific laws are often assumed rather than predicted. Our recent work has used molecular dynamics (MD) simulation methods to derive a general cohesive zone law for the fracture between two brittle materials under any mixed-mode loading conditions. Here we extend our method and use it to explore the effect of elastic constant mismatch between adjacent materials. In particular, we construct two bilayer structures where the cohesive energies and lattice constants of the constituent materials are kept the same, but the elastic constant mismatch of the two materials in one structure differs from that in the other. We then use MD simulations to study the fracture and to derive the cohesive zone laws for both structures. The effect of elastic constant mismatch on fracture will then be discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Choi · Mech Mater · 1999 · 31 · 43110.1016/S0167-6636(99)00016-2 ↗
2. Park · Surf Coat Technol · 1990 · 43–44 · 48110.1016/0257-8972(90)90099-X ↗
3. Dai · IEEE Trans Compon Pack Technol · 2000 · 23 · 10110.1109/6144.833049 ↗
4. Hao · J Mech Phys Solids · 1996 · 23 · 44
5. Yang · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 81 · 358810.1063/1.1515876 ↗
6. Yang · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 80 · 175810.1063/1.1458693 ↗
7. Li · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 318610.1063/1.1619221 ↗
8. Brown · Appl Surf Sci · 2000 · 166 · 39210.1016/S0169-4332(00)00455-4 ↗
9. English · Annu Rev Mater Sci · 1978 · 8 · 45910.1146/annurev.ms.08.080178.002331 ↗
10. Evans · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 250710.1016/0956-7151(94)00444-M ↗
11. Xu · J Mech Phys Solids · 1994 · 42 · 139710.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗
12. Xu · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1993 · 1 · 11110.1088/0965-0393/1/2/001 ↗
13. Tvergaard · J Mech Phys Solids · 1993 · 41 · 111910.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-M ↗
14. Gall · J Mech Phys Solids · 2000 · 48 · 218310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00086-1 ↗
15. Rottler · Phys Rev Lett · 2002 · 89 · 14830410.1103/PhysRevLett.89.148304 ↗
16. Rottler · J Adhes Sci Technol · 2003 · 17 · 36910.1163/156856103762864679 ↗
17. Spearot · Mech Mater · 2004 · 36 · 82510.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.002 ↗
18. Yamakov · J Mech Phys Sol · 2006 · 54 · 189910.1016/j.jmps.2006.03.004 ↗
19. Zhou · Mech Mater · 2008 · 40 · 83210.1016/j.mechmat.2008.05.001 ↗
20. Yu · Inter J Fract · 2002 · 113 · 3910.1023/A:1013790232359 ↗
21. Zhou · Computat Mater Sci · 2007 · 39 · 34010.1016/j.commatsci.2006.07.009 ↗
22. Zhou · Computat Mater Sci · 2007 · 39 · 54110.1016/j.commatsci.2006.08.005 ↗
23. Zotov · Intermetallics · 2008 · 16 · 11310.1016/j.intermet.2007.08.006 ↗
24. Plimpton SJ. LAMMPS, Sandia National Laboratories; 2008. .
25. Zimmerman · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · 12 · S31910.1088/0965-0393/12/4/S03 ↗
26. Griffith · Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond A · 1920 · 221 · 16310.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗