journal article·2009-08

Thermodynamics of grain boundary premelting in alloys. II. Atomistic simulation

P.L. Williams, Y. Mishin

Acta Materialia· Volume 57· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We apply the semi-grand-canonical Monte Carlo method with an embedded-atom potential to study grain boundary (GB) premelting in Cu-rich Cu–Ag alloys. The Σ 5 GB chosen for this study becomes increasingly disordered near the solidus line while its local chemical composition approaches the liquidus composition at the same temperature. This behavior indicates the formation of a thin layer of the liquid phase in the GB when the grain composition approaches the solidus. The thickness of the liquid layer remains finite and the GB can be overheated/oversaturated to metastable states slightly above the solidus. The premelting behavior found by the simulations is qualitatively consistent with the phase-field model of the same binary system presented in Part I of this work [Mishin Y, Boettinger WJ, Warren JA, McFadden GB. Acta Mater, in press]. Although this agreement is encouraging, we discuss several problems arising when atomistic simulations are compared with phase-field modeling.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Mishin · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 377110.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.044 ↗
2. Sutton · 1995
3. Ubbelohde · 1978
4. Watanabe · Philos Mag A · 1984 · 49 · 84510.1080/01418618408236566 ↗
5. Inoko · Interface Sci · 1997 · 4 · 26310.1007/BF00240246 ↗
6. Luo · Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci · 2007 · 32 · 6710.1080/10408430701364388 ↗
7. Lobkovsky · Physica D · 2002 · 164 · 20210.1016/S0167-2789(02)00377-9 ↗
8. Tang · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 02410210.1103/PhysRevB.73.024102 ↗
9. Tang · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 97 · 07550210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.075502 ↗
10. Rappaz · Metall Mater Trans A · 2003 · 34 · 46710.1007/s11661-003-0083-3 ↗
11. Murray · Metall Trans A · 1984 · 15 · 26110.1007/BF02645110 ↗
12. 1986
13. Kikuchi · Phys Rev B · 1980 · 21 · 189310.1103/PhysRevB.21.1893 ↗
14. Besold · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 657310.1103/PhysRevB.50.6573 ↗
15. Besold · Compos Mater Sci · 2000 · 18 · 22510.1016/S0927-0256(00)00101-4 ↗
16. Suzuki · J Mater Sci · 2005 · 40 · 315510.1007/s10853-005-2678-0 ↗
17. Keblinski · Philos Mag A · 1999 · 79 · 273510.1080/01418619908212021 ↗
18. Ciccotti · Phys Rev B · 1983 · 27 · 557610.1103/PhysRevB.27.5576 ↗
19. Guillope · Surf Sci · 1984 · 144 · 6710.1016/0039-6028(84)90704-0 ↗
20. Broughton · Phys Rev Lett · 1986 · 56 · 269210.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2692 ↗
21. Broughton · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1998 · 6 · 8710.1088/0965-0393/6/1/008 ↗
22. Lutsko · Phys Rev B · 1988 · 38 · 1157210.1103/PhysRevB.38.11572 ↗
23. Lutsko · Phys Rev B · 1989 · 40 · 284110.1103/PhysRevB.40.2841 ↗
24. Nguyen · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 605010.1103/PhysRevB.46.6050 ↗
25. Lu · Interface Sci · 1995 · 3 · 14310.1007/BF00207016 ↗
26. Williams · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2006 · 14 · 81710.1088/0965-0393/14/5/002 ↗
27. Menyhard · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 278310.1016/0956-7151(94)90219-4 ↗
28. Creuze · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 62 · 281310.1103/PhysRevB.62.2813 ↗
29. Creuze · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 86 · 573510.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5735 ↗
30. Frenkel · 2002
31. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1985 · 32 · 768510.1103/PhysRevB.32.7685 ↗
32. Foiles · 1990 · 79
33. Suzuki · Interface Sci · 2003 · 11 · 13110.1023/A:1021599310093 ↗
34. Kobayashi · Physica D · 2000 · 140 · 14110.1016/S0167-2789(00)00023-3 ↗
35. Lobkovsky · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 05160510.1103/PhysRevE.63.051605 ↗
36. Warren · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 603510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00388-4 ↗