journal article·2012-04

Bendable bulk metallic glass: Effects of a thin, adhesive, strong, and ductile coating

Jinn P. Chu, J.E. Greene, Jason S.C. Jang, J.C. Huang, Yu-Lin Shen, Peter K. Liaw, Yoshihiko Yokoyama, Akihisa Inoue, T.G. Nieh

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We demonstrate, for the first time, that a thin, strong, ductile, and adhesive coating renders bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) bendable. The bending ductility of 3 mm thick BMGs, Zr 50 Cu 30 Al 10 Ni 10 in this case, can be dramatically enhanced from ∼0% to ∼13.7% by the deposition of a thin bilayer film on the tensile side of the BMG sample. The bilayer, consisting of a 25 nm thick Ti adhesive layer with a 200 nm thick metallic glass (MG) overlayer, exhibits the required synergistic combination of good adhesion, high strength, and ductility compared with other single-layer films examined (Ti, TiN, and MG). Cross-sectional scanning and transmission electron microscopy, together with finite element modeling, reveal that the bilayer coating absorbs deformation while allowing more homogeneous formation of a high density of smaller shear bands at the bilayer/BMG interface. The bilayer coating, in turn, covers surface weak points and minimizes the formation of localized shear bands which lead to catastrophic failure under bending. As a result, the average shear-band spacing in bilayer-coated BMGs is small, 54 μm, and approximately equal to that found in bendable, 450 μm thick, MG ribbons. Thus, coated BMGs can accommodate large strains and overcome the MG size effect, without sacrificing their extraordinary mechanical properties. Our results for both coated and uncoated BMGs, as well as previously reported results for uncoated metallic glasses, with thicknesses ranging from ribbons to thin plates to bulk, are well described by a simple power law relationship between plastic strain to failure and shear band spacing. This scaling law may be useful in guiding future experiments toward producing more flexible BMGs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2004 · 48 · 27910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6 ↗
2. Greer · MRS Bull · 2007 · 32 · 61110.1557/mrs2007.121 ↗
3. Song · Intermetallics · 2008 · 16 · 81310.1016/j.intermet.2008.03.007 ↗
4. Cheng · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 37910.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.002 ↗
5. Hofmann · Nature · 2008 · 451 · 108510.1038/nature06598 ↗
6. Jang · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 01193010.1063/1.2828037 ↗
7. Wu · Adv Mater · 2010 · 22 · 277010.1002/adma.201000482 ↗
8. Pauly · Nat Mater · 2010 · 9 · 47310.1038/nmat2767 ↗
9. Zhang · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 85710.1038/nmat1758 ↗
10. Conner · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 94 · 90410.1063/1.1582555 ↗
11. Conner · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 242910.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.034 ↗
12. Chiang · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 88 · 13190210.1063/1.2189917 ↗
13. Liu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 468–470 · 24610.1016/j.msea.2006.09.099 ↗
14. Chu · Surf Coat Technol · 2011 · 205 · 403010.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.02.040 ↗
15. Jang JSC. Unpublished work; 2011.
16. Yu · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 238410.1557/jmr.2007.0318 ↗
17. Li · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 50810.1557/jmr.2007.0060 ↗
18. Chen · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 298810.1016/j.msea.2010.12.077 ↗
19. Huang JC. Unpublished work; 2011.
20. Stoney · Proc Roy Soc London Ser A · 1909 · 82 · 17210.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
21. Janssen · Thin Solid Films · 2009 · 517 · 185810.1016/j.tsf.2008.07.014 ↗
22. Mendelson · 1968
23. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
24. Kimura H, Masumoto T. In: Lubrosky FE, editor. Amorphous metallic alloys. London: Butterworth; 1983. p. 87.
25. Bruck · Scripta Metall Mater · 1994 · 30 · 42910.1016/0956-716X(94)90598-3 ↗
26. Cordill · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 910.1007/s11837-010-0096-5 ↗
27. Du · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 91 · 13190110.1063/1.2790380 ↗
28. Petrov · J Vac Sci Technol A · 2003 · 21 · S11710.1116/1.1601610 ↗
29. Greene JE. In: Martin PM, editor. Handbook of deposition technologies for films and coatings. Amsterdam, Boston, MA: Elsevier; 2010.
30. Chu · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 11341010.1103/PhysRevB.69.113410 ↗
31. Ahmed · Thin Solid Films · 2011 · 519 · 500710.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.070 ↗
32. Chang · Surf Coat Technol · 2007 · 201 · 670210.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.09.035 ↗
33. Ljungcrantz · J Appl Phys · 1996 · 80 · 672510.1063/1.363799 ↗
34. Lee · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 71 · 14410610.1103/PhysRevB.71.144106 ↗
35. Huang · Surf Coat Technol · 2006 · 201 · 319910.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.06.038 ↗
36. Shibata · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 30910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.029 ↗
37. Wang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 285810.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.025 ↗
38. Ravichandran · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 408710.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.011 ↗
39. Miracle · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 283110.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.022 ↗
40. Huang · Appl Lett · 2007 · 90 · 08191910.1063/1.2696502 ↗
41. Bei · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 96 · 10550310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.105503 ↗
42. Wu · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 50110.1557/jmr.2007.0064 ↗