journal article·2013-01

Behavior of palladium and its impact on intermetallic growth in palladium-coated Cu wire bonding

Hui Xu, Ivy Qin, Horst Clauberg, Bob Chylak, Viola L. Acoff

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper describes the behavior of palladium in palladium-coated Cu (PdCu) wire bonding and its impact on bond reliability by utilizing transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A Pd layer approximately 80 nm thick, which is coated on the surface of Cu wire, dissolves into the Cu matrix during ball formation (under N2 gas protection) when the wire tip is melted to form a ball. As a result of dissolving the very thin Pd layer into the ball, Pd is almost undetectable along the entire bond interface between the ball and the Al pad. The behavior of Pd during thermal aging in air, however, is different for central and peripheral interfaces. At the central interface, less than 5 at.% Pd is present after 168 h aging at 175 °C. At the periphery, however, Pd diffuses back and congregates, reaching a level of ∼12 at.% after 24 h, and a Pd-rich (Cu,Pd)9Al4 layer (>40 at.% Pd) forms after 168 h. Pd acts substitutionally in Cu9Al4 but cannot penetrate into the CuAl2 or CuAl. By comparison of intermetallic thickness and interfacial morphology between PdCu and bare Cu wire bonds, it is concluded that the presence of Pd reduces intermetallic growth rate, and is associated with numerous nanovoids in PdCu bonds.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Harman · 2010
2. Xu · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 566110.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.041 ↗
3. Breach · Microelectron Reliab · 2010 · 50 · 110.1016/j.microrel.2009.08.003 ↗
4. Rezvani A, Mayer M, Shah A, Zhou N, Hong SJ, Moon JT. In: 61th Electronic components and technology conference, Orlando, FL; June, 2011. p. 1516.10.1109/ECTC.2011.5898711 ↗
5. Tomohiro · Microelectron Reliab · 2011 · 51 · 14810.1016/j.microrel.2010.03.006 ↗
6. Qin I, Xu H, Clauberg H, Cathcart R, Acoff VL, Chylak B, et al. In: 61th Electronic components and technology conference, Orlando, FL; Jun, 2011. p. 1489.10.1109/ECTC.2011.5898707 ↗
7. Xu · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 16510.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.034 ↗
8. Li · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90
9. Drozdov · J Mater Sci · 2008 · 43 · 603810.1007/s10853-008-2955-9 ↗
10. Drozdov · J Mater Sci · 2008 · 43 · 602910.1007/s10853-008-2954-x ↗
11. Subramanian · J Phase Equilib · 1991 · 12 · 23110.1007/BF02645723 ↗
12. Xu · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 64210.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.050 ↗
13. Sritharan · J Mater Res · 2008 · 23 · 137110.1557/JMR.2008.0161 ↗
14. Park · IEEE Trans Compon Pack Technol · 2007 · 30 · 73110.1109/TCAPT.2007.906318 ↗