journal article·2026-04-26

Synthesis and application of sizing agents for improved mechanical performance of CF/BMI composites

Emre Akin, Selma Ecer

Publisher page

Abstract

The interfacial performance between carbon fibers (CF) and heat-resistant bismaleimide (BMI) matrices is a key factor governing the mechanical behavior of advanced composites. In this study, three HDI-trimer polyisocyanate-terminated sizing agents with different chemical linkages, namely urea (UH-ISO), amide (AH-ISO), and melamine-based (MH-ISO), were designed to tailor the fiber–matrix interface. The trifunctional NCO groups of the HDI-trimer enable chemical bonding and crosslinking with the BMI matrix. Mechanical results showed that UH-ISO-treated composites exhibited the highest performance, reaching 667 MPa flexural strength and 47.9 MPa interlaminar shear strength, corresponding to an increase of approximately +110% compared to DDS/NS composites. MH-ISO systems showed moderate improvements (up to +57%), while AH-ISO demonstrated limited enhancement, particularly in MXDA-based systems (+1%). Surface and chemical analyses (SEM, optical profilometry, and XPS) indicated that interfacial performance is mainly governed by coating uniformity and functional group distribution. UH-ISO formed a uniform interphase that allowed effective resin infiltration and stress transfer. In contrast, AH-ISO caused local accumulation and restricted matrix penetration, leading to defect formation. MH-ISO exhibited a relatively homogeneous interphase, where localized surface irregularities were observed, likely related to its multi-functional structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Flame retardant materials and properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Marmara University

Funding

Marmara University Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen Y, Mao J, Qian B, et al. Progress in surface modification preparation, interface characterization and properties of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites. Compos Interface. 2023;31(6):729–758.10.1080/09276440.2023.2279398 ↗
2. 10.1080/09276440.2018.143963010.1080/09276440.2018.1439630 ↗
3. Li W, Quan G, Li X, et al. Construction of 3d nanostructures on carbon fiber surfaces by sizing for preparing high-performance composites. Polym Compos. 2024;45(13):11860–11871.10.1002/pc.28604 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2859110.1002/pc.28591 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12984510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129845 ↗
6. 10.1080/09276440.2016.117685310.1080/09276440.2016.1176853 ↗
7. 10.1080/09276440.2019.169261510.1080/09276440.2019.1692615 ↗
8. Chen H, Bajaj D, Patil D, et al. Fracture behavior of high-performance carbon fiber composites toughened by reactive polyetherimide. Polym Compos. 2024;45(6):4502–4512.10.1002/pc.28076 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2676010.1002/pc.26760 ↗
10. 10.1080/09276440.2021.188861910.1080/09276440.2021.1888619 ↗
11. Wang Y, Lu Y, Zhang J, et al. Enhanced toughness and gas permeabilities of polyimide composites derived from polyimide matrix and flower-like polyimide microparticles. Polym Compos. 2021;42(12):3870–3881.10.1002/pc.26099 ↗
12. Huang C, Zhang P, Liu Z, et al. Effect of electrochemical anodic oxidation modification on the interfacial properties of carbon fiber reinforced polyimide composites. Polym Compos. 2024;45(10):1–14.
13. 10.1002/pc.2634910.1002/pc.26349 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2918810.1002/pc.29188 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2903510.1002/pc.29035 ↗
16. 10.1080/10601325.2022.214213510.1080/10601325.2022.2142135 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13281710.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132817 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.18410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.184 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma1723596210.3390/ma17235962 ↗
20. Wu Q, Li M, Gu Y, et al. Effect of sizing on interfacial adhesion of commercial high-strength carbon fiber-reinforced resin composites. Polym Compos. 2016;37(2):254–261.10.1002/pc.23176 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2641410.1002/pc.26414 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10955910.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109559 ↗
23. 10.1002/pen.2719110.1002/pen.27191 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.001 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2587610.1002/pc.25876 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1521762510.3390/ma15217625 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.5132610.1002/app.51326 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10849010.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108490 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10883110.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108831 ↗
30. 10.1002/slct.20200123210.1002/slct.202001232 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10825810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108258 ↗
32. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100137-0.00009-210.1016/B978-0-08-100137-0.00009-2 ↗
33. Tan W, Naya F, Yang L, et al. The role of interfacial properties on the intralaminar and interlaminar damage behaviour of unidirectional composite laminates. Compos Part B Eng. 2018;138:206–221.10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.043 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2009.07.012 ↗
35. Ozcan S. Intermittent sizing on carbon fiber for composite application. Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2017.
36. 10.1177/002199831877215210.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
37. 10.30564/opmr.v1i2.168310.30564/opmr.v1i2.1683 ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1609126610.3390/polym16091266 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0247310.1021/acs.langmuir.4c02473 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c0026210.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00262 ↗
41. 10.1163/15685540878465531910.1163/156855408784655319 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00051-410.1016/S0008-6223(03)00051-4 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1620673210.3390/ma16206732 ↗
44. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00029-110.1016/0266-3538(95)00029-1 ↗
45. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.236-238.82910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.236-238.829 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.06210.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.062 ↗
47. 10.1115/IMECE2014-3882510.1115/IMECE2014-38825 ↗
48. 10.1163/15685540878465531910.1163/156855408784655319 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.coco.2025.10231010.1016/j.coco.2025.102310 ↗
50. 10.3390/polym1524467810.3390/polym15244678 ↗
51. 10.1177/1558925023118315910.1177/15589250231183159 ↗
52. 10.1007/s11998-018-0147-310.1007/s11998-018-0147-3 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11017010.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110170 ↗
54. 10.1002/app.5494710.1002/app.54947 ↗
55. 10.3390/polym1412241210.3390/polym14122412 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00558-410.1016/S0169-4332(00)00558-4 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15326110.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153261 ↗
58. 10.1016/0008-6223(94)00144-O10.1016/0008-6223(94)00144-O ↗
59. 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00030-H10.1016/0008-6223(95)00030-H ↗
60. 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00170-210.1016/S0008-6223(03)00170-2 ↗
61. 10.1116/11.2005110610.1116/11.20051106 ↗
62. 10.17576/jsm-2018-4708-3310.17576/jsm-2018-4708-33 ↗
63. 10.1080/15440478.2023.229304810.1080/15440478.2023.2293048 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10578310.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105783 ↗