journal article·2008-08

Fracture roughness scaling and its correlation with grain boundary network structure

Bryan W. Reed, Mukul Kumar, Roger W. Minich, Robert E. Rudd

Acta Materialia· Volume 56· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Roughness scaling laws for intergranular cracks deviate from self-affine (fractal-like) behavior at length scales related to the polycrystalline microstructure. We consider two versions of the same alloy material with many of the same microstructural length scales but differing in their processing history: one conventional and one grain boundary engineered. The engineered material, processed to contain a high fraction of “special” grain boundaries, fails more slowly and more isotropically. We present evidence that the difference is determined by processes related to clusters of twin-related grains, shown through analysis of scales of the fracture roughness measured with confocal microscopy and the special grain boundary network determined by electron backscatter diffraction. Above the cluster scale, the fracture roughness exponents in the two materials are nearly indistinguishable (confirming theoretical predictions); below this scale conventional cracks exhibit correlations indicating consistently weak paths for crack propagation, suggesting percolation of “random” boundaries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Theoretical and Computational Physics · Landslides and related hazards · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Grimmer · Acta Crystallogr A · 1974 · 30 · 19710.1107/S056773947400043X ↗
2. Brandon · Acta Metall · 1966 · 14 · 147910.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
3. Watanabe · Res Mech · 1984 · 11 · 47
4. Palumbo G. US Patent 5702,543; 1997 and 5817,193; 1998.
5. Was · Mat Res Soc Symp Proc · 2004 · 819 · 8710.1557/PROC-819-N2.1 ↗
6. Gao · Metall Mater Trans A · 2005 · 36A · 332510.1007/s11661-005-0007-5 ↗
7. Dave · Weld J · 2004 · 83 · 1s
8. Wells · Corrosion · 1989 · 45 · 64910.5006/1.3579319 ↗
9. Gaudett · Metall Mater Trans A · 1994 · 25 · 77510.1007/BF02665454 ↗
10. Lejcek · Mater Sci Technol – Lond · 2005 · 21 · 39310.1179/174328405X39716 ↗
11. Thomson · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 490910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00192-4 ↗
12. Randle · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 101110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.050 ↗
13. Frary · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 432310.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.030 ↗
14. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 208110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00045-8 ↗
15. Krupp · Mater Sci Technol – Lond · 2005 · 21 · 124710.1179/174328405X63935 ↗
16. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 68710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00447-0 ↗
17. Schwartz · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 96310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.052 ↗
18. Schuh · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 71110.1080/0141861021000056681 ↗
19. Minich · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 66 · 05210110.1103/PhysRevB.66.052101 ↗
20. Schuh · J Mater Sci · 2005 · 40 · 84710.1007/s10853-005-6500-9 ↗
21. Gertsman · Interface Sci · 2003 · 11 · 40310.1023/A:1026191810431 ↗
22. Gertsman · Acta Crystallogr A · 2001 · 57 · 36910.1107/S0108767301000654 ↗
23. Reed · Acta Crystallogr A · 2004 · 60 · 26310.1107/S010876730400772X ↗
24. Reed · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 102910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.045 ↗
25. McGarrity · Model Simul Mater Sci · 2007 · 15 · S35310.1088/0965-0393/15/4/S03 ↗
26. Duxbury · Mech Mater · 2006 · 38 · 75710.1016/j.mechmat.2005.06.031 ↗
27. Seppala · MRS Proc · 2004 · 819 · N1.410.1557/PROC-819-N1.4 ↗
28. Mandelbrot · Nature · 1984 · 308 · 72110.1038/308721a0 ↗
29. Bouchaud · J Phys – Condens Matter · 1997 · 9 · 431910.1088/0953-8984/9/21/002 ↗
30. Ponson · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 96 · 03550610.1103/PhysRevLett.96.035506 ↗
31. 2000
32. Mandelbrot BB, Hudson RL. The misbehavior of markets: a fractal view of risk, ruin, and reward. Basic books; 2004.
33. Seuront · 2007
34. Sornette · 2004
35. Dauskardt · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 14310.1016/0956-7151(90)90043-G ↗
36. Feder · 1988
37. Bouchaud · Europhys Lett · 1990 · 13 · 7310.1209/0295-5075/13/1/013 ↗
38. Daguier · Phys Rev E · 1996 · 53 · 563710.1103/PhysRevE.53.5637 ↗
39. Boffa · Eur Phys J – Appl Phys · 1998 · 2 · 28110.1051/epjap:1998194 ↗
40. Boffa · Physica A · 2000 · 278 · 6510.1016/S0378-4371(99)00598-1 ↗
41. Basinger · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 95910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.026 ↗
42. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 259910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00090-3 ↗
43. Miyazawa · Acta Crystallogr A · 1996 · 52 · 78710.1107/S0108767396005934 ↗
44. Randle · 1996
45. Russ · 2000
46. Randle · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.031 ↗
47. Andresen PL. In: Ninth international symposium on environmental degradation of materials in nuclear power systems – water reactors; 1999. p. 411.
48. Andresen PL, Gott K, Nelson JL. In: Ninth international symposium on environmental degradation of materials in nuclear power systems – water reactors; 1999. p. 423.10.1002/9781118787618.ch43 ↗
49. Schmittbuhl · Phys Rev E · 1995 · 51 · 13110.1103/PhysRevE.51.131 ↗
50. Simonsen · Phys Rev E · 1998 · 58 · 277910.1103/PhysRevE.58.2779 ↗
51. Cwajna · Mater Charact · 2001 · 46 · 18310.1016/S1044-5803(01)00122-X ↗
52. Silverman · 1986
53. Grimmett · 1989
54. Holm · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 103510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.048 ↗