Towards smooth and pure iron nanowires grown by electrodeposition in self-organized alumina membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Due to their high aspect ratio, magnetic nanowires are interesting for various applications. Fe nanowires are of particular interest due to their high magnetization, which suggests high shape anisotropy is possible. Here, we show how the electrodeposition process can be adapted to the constraints of a high aspect ratio template in order to approach an ideal behaviour of smooth and pure Fe nanowires. An adjustment of the Fe2+ concentration and the addition of H3BO3 result in smooth and continuous nanowires; saturation polarization is achieved, together with an anisotropy field of up to 70% compared to pure Fe. Mossbauer spectroscopy reveals a negligible amount of impurities. Together with magnetic measurements we show that shape anisotropy aligns the preferential magnetization axis along the wire axis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Magnetic properties of thin films · Nanoporous metals and alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Sellmyer · J Phys: Condens Matter · 2001 · 13 · R443
2. McGary · J Appl Phys · 2006 · 99 · 08B31010.1063/1.2167332 ↗
3. Nanofabrication Technologies10.1117/12.507189 ↗
4. Masuda · Science · 1995 · 268 · 146610.1126/science.268.5216.1466 ↗
5. MacLaren · J Appl Phys · 1999 · 85 · 483310.1063/1.370036 ↗
6. Huang · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 91 · 686910.1063/1.1447524 ↗
7. Wang · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 15 · 48510.1088/0957-4484/15/5/014 ↗
8. Paulus · J Magn Magn Mater · 2001 · 224 · 18010.1016/S0304-8853(00)00711-3 ↗
9. Baik · J Phys Chem C · 2008 · 112 · 225210.1021/jp711621v ↗
10. Zheng · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 62 · 12,28210.1103/PhysRevB.62.12282 ↗
11. Qin · Chem Mater · 2005 · 17 · 182910.1021/cm047870q ↗
12. Yang · J Magn Magn Mater · 2000 · 222 · 9710.1016/S0304-8853(00)00541-2 ↗
13. Kröll · J Magn Magn Mater · 2002 · 249 · 24110.1016/S0304-8853(02)00537-1 ↗
14. Zeng · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 87 · 471810.1063/1.373137 ↗
15. Zana · J Magn Magn Mater · 2005 · 292 · 26610.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.141 ↗
16. Žužek Rožman · J Magn Magn Mater · 2007 · 314 · 11610.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.146 ↗
17. Dahmane · J Phys D: Appl Phys · 2006 · 39 · 452310.1088/0022-3727/39/21/001 ↗
18. Leistner · Electrochem Commun · 2006 · 8 · 91610.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.032 ↗
19. Kumar · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 06442110.1103/PhysRevB.73.064421 ↗
20. Navas · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 103 · 510.1063/1.2834719 ↗
21. Nielsch · Appl Phys Lett · 2001 · 79 · 136010.1063/1.1399006 ↗
22. Vázquez · J Magn Magn Mater · 2005 · 294 · 17410.1016/j.jmmm.2005.03.032 ↗
23. Li · J Appl Phys · 1998 · 84 · 602310.1063/1.368911 ↗
24. Rixecker · J Phys D: Appl Phys · 1993 · 26 · 87010.1088/0022-3727/26/5/023 ↗
25. Schaaf · Zeitschrift für Metallkunde · 1991 · 82 · 815
26. Schaaf · Nucl Instrum Meth B · 1991 · 53 · 18410.1016/0168-583X(91)95655-W ↗
27. Leistner · Electrochim Acta · 2006 · 52 · 17010.1016/j.electacta.2006.04.055 ↗
28. Huang · J Cryst Growth · 2006 · 289 · 29510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.11.124 ↗
29. Yin · Surf Coat Technol · 1996 · 78 · 20510.1016/0257-8972(94)02410-3 ↗
30. Koza · J Electroanal Chem · 2008 · 617 · 19410.1016/j.jelechem.2008.02.009 ↗
31. Pourbaix · 1966
32. Brankovic · Electrochim Acta · 2008 · 53 · 593410.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.071 ↗
33. Zech · Electrochim Acta · 2000 · 45 · 346110.1016/S0013-4686(00)00415-1 ↗
34. Gadad · J Electrochem Soc · 1998 · 145 · 369910.1149/1.1838861 ↗
35. Bockris · Electrochim Acta · 1961 · 4 · 32510.1016/0013-4686(61)80026-1 ↗
36. Jagminas · Mater Chem Phys · 2008 · 109 · 8210.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.10.036 ↗
37. Peng · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 87 · 740510.1063/1.373001 ↗
38. 2002