Twin relationships of 5M modulated martensite in Ni–Mn–Ga alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract For Ni–Mn–Ga ferromagnetic shape memory alloys, the characteristic features of modulated martensite (including the number/shape of constituent variants, the inter-variant orientation relationship and the geometrical distribution of variant interfaces) determine the attainability of the shape memory effect. In the present work, a comprehensive microstructural and crystallographic investigation has been conducted on a bulk polycrystalline Ni 50 Mn 28 Ga 22 alloy. As a first attempt, the orientation measurements by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) – using the precise information on the commensurate 5M modulated monoclinic superstructure (instead of the conventionally simplified non-modulated tetragonal structure) – were successfully performed to identify the crystallographic orientations on an individual basis. Consequently, the morphology of modulated martensite, the orientation relationships between adjacent variants and the characters of twin interfaces were unambiguously determined. With the thus-obtained full-featured image on the configuration of martensitic variants, the possibility of microstructural modification by proper mechanical “training” was further discussed. This new effort makes it feasible to explore the crystallographic/microstructural correlations in modulated martensite with high statistical reliability, which in turn provides useful guidance for optimizing the microstructure and shape memory performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Murray · Appl Phys Lett · 2000 · 77 · 88610.1063/1.1306635 ↗
2. Sozinov · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 80 · 174610.1063/1.1458075 ↗
3. Müllner · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 153110.1063/1.1639144 ↗
4. Ullakko · Appl Phys Lett · 1996 · 69 · 196610.1063/1.117637 ↗
5. O’Handley · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 87 · 471210.1063/1.373136 ↗
6. Gaitzsch · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 36510.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.017 ↗
7. Gaitzsch · Scr Mater · 2007 · 57 · 49310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.05.026 ↗
8. Straka · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 549210.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.020 ↗
9. Mogylnyy · Scr Mater · 2003 · 48 · 142710.1016/S1359-6462(03)00108-8 ↗
10. Righi · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 523710.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.040 ↗
11. Righi · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 452910.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.010 ↗
12. Nishida · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 1810.1016/j.msea.2007.01.179 ↗
13. Han · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 173110.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.034 ↗
14. Pons · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 302710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00130-0 ↗
15. Ge · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 438–440 · 18
16. Scheerbaum · New J Phys · 2008 · 10 · 07300210.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073002 ↗
17. Scheerbaum · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 462910.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.030 ↗
18. Chulist · Scr Mater · 2010 · 63 · 54810.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.028 ↗
19. Pötschke · Scr Mater · 2010 · 63 · 38310.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.027 ↗
20. Chulist · Scr Mater · 2010 · 62 · 65010.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.016 ↗
21. Glavatskyy · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 29810.1016/j.msea.2007.02.139 ↗
22. Li · J Appl Cryst · 2010 · 43 · 61710.1107/S002188981000868X ↗
23. Jiang · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 277910.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.024 ↗
24. Kraus · J Appl Cryst · 1996 · 29 · 30110.1107/S0021889895014920 ↗
25. Wedel · J Alloy Compd · 1999 · 290 · 13710.1016/S0925-8388(99)00198-X ↗
26. Bunge · J Appl Cryst · 1980 · 13 · 54410.1107/S0021889880012757 ↗
27. Cong · J Appl Cryst · 2006 · 39 · 72310.1107/S0021889806027488 ↗
28. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
29. Bilby · Proc Roy Soc Ser A · 1965 · 288 · 240
30. Zhang · J Appl Cryst · 2010 · 43 · 142610.1107/S0021889810037180 ↗
31. Zhang · J Appl Cryst · 2007 · 40 · 43610.1107/S0021889807014331 ↗
32. Gottstein · 2004