Detailed modelling of delamination buckling of thin films under global tension
Source abstract
Abstract
Tensile specimens of metal films on compliant substrates are widely used for determining interfacial properties. These properties are identified by the comparison of experimentally observed delamination buckling and a mathematical model which contains the interface properties as parameters. The current two-dimensional models for delamination buckling are not able to capture the complex stress and deformation states arising in the considered uniaxial tension test in a satisfying way. Therefore, three-dimensional models are developed in a multi-scale approach. It is shown that, for the considered uniaxial tension test, the buckling and associated delamination process are initiated and driven by interfacial shear in addition to compressive stresses in the film. The proposed model is able to reproduce all important experimentally observed phenomena, like cracking stress of the film, film strip curvature and formation of triangular buckles. Combined with experimental data, the developed computational model is found to be effective in determining interface strength properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Volinsky · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 44110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00354-8 ↗
2. Cordill · IEEE Trans Device Mater Reliab · 2004 · 4 · 16310.1109/TDMR.2004.829071 ↗
3. Dauskardt · Eng Fract Mech · 1998 · 61 · 14110.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-6 ↗
4. Hutchinson · Adv Appl Mech · 1992 · 29 · 6310.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
5. Yeager · J Neurosci Methods · 2008 · 173 · 27910.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.06.024 ↗
6. van der Sluis · Eng Fract Mech · 2011 · 78 · 87710.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.01.013 ↗
7. Cordill · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 552010.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.032 ↗
8. Frank · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 144210.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.023 ↗
9. Leterrier · J Adhes · 1994 · 44 · 21310.1080/00218469408027078 ↗
10. Kelly · J Mech Phys Solids · 1965 · 13 · 32910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
11. Hu · Acta Metall Mater · 1989 · 37 · 91710.1016/0001-6160(89)90018-7 ↗
12. Beuth · Int J Solids Struct · 1992 · 29 · 165710.1016/0020-7683(92)90015-L ↗
13. Yu · Int J Fract · 2002 · 113 · 3910.1023/A:1013790232359 ↗
14. Beuth · J Mech Phys Solids · 1996 · 44 · 141110.1016/0022-5096(96)00042-7 ↗
15. Thouless · J Mech Phys Solids · 2011 · 59 · 192710.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.009 ↗
16. Chai · Int J Fract · 1990 · 46 · 23710.1007/BF00037155 ↗
17. Moon · J Mech Phys Solids · 2002 · 50 · 235510.1016/S0022-5096(02)00034-0 ↗
18. Huang · J Mech Phys Solids · 2005 · 53 · 6310.1016/j.jmps.2004.06.007 ↗
19. Audoly · J Mech Phys Solids · 2000 · 48 · 231510.1016/S0022-5096(00)00007-7 ↗
20. Huang · J Mech Phys Solids · 2005 · 53 · 210110.1016/j.jmps.2005.03.007 ↗
21. Lacour · IEEE Electr Device L · 2004 · 25 · 17910.1109/LED.2004.825190 ↗
22. Cordill · Metall Mater Trans A · 2010 · 41A · 87010.1007/s11661-009-9988-9 ↗
23. Tvergaard · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 137710.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3 ↗
24. Corona · Int J Fract · 2011 · 170 · 19110.1007/s10704-011-9609-7 ↗
25. Taylor · Philos Mag · 2012
26. Douville · Soft Matter · 2011 · 7 · 649310.1039/c1sm05140g ↗
27. Xie · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 47710.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.005 ↗