Advance in the research on the interface constitutive relationship of SiC p /Al composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The interface plays a critical role in load transfer within SiCp/Al composites. However, the material’s complex internal structure presents challenges, limiting effective methods for predicting interfacial strength and fracture toughness between particles and the matrix. This paper offers a thorough review of recent developments in the study on the interface constitutive relationships of SiCp/Al composites, covering experimental research, theoretical modeling, and finite element simulations. The existing challenges and future directions are discussed. The research results contribute to the improvement of the method obtaining the interface constitutive relationship of SiCp/Al composites, and provide theoretical foundations for the optimization of process parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tianjin University of Technology and Education
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Tianjin Education Commission Project · Tianjin Innovation Team Project · Tianjin Post Graduate Research and Innovation Project · Tianjin Post graduate Research and Innovation Project
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.11264710.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112647 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.13109510.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.131095 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.04710.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.047 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2020.03.00710.1016/j.nanoms.2020.03.007 ↗
5. Wang W, Yuan S, Qiao K, et al. Microstructure and nanomechanical behavior of friction stir welded joint of 7055 aluminum alloy. J Manuf Processes. 2021;61:311–321.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.11.016 ↗
6. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-210.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-2 ↗
8. Zhu J, Lang FC, Wang SY, et al. Determination of the interfacial properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymers using nanoindentation. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2022;41(13–14):509–516.10.1177/07316844211063571 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11140210.1016/j.matchar.2021.111402 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.06810.1016/j.msea.2017.11.068 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11198210.1016/j.matchar.2022.111982 ↗
12. Xia S, Qi Y, Perry T. Strength characterization of Al/Si interfaces: a hybrid method of nanoindentation and finite element analysis. Acta Materialia. 2009;57(3):695–707.10.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.011 ↗
13. Jing Y, De-hong L, Wang J. Influence of TiO2 on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al2O3p/Steel Matrix Composites Prepared by Squeeze Casting. J Mater Eng. 2016;44(12):84–91.
14. Kim Y, Lee JC. Processing and interfacial bonding strength of 2014 Al matrix composites reinforced with oxidized SiC particles. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;420(1–2):8–12.10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.032 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.01610.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.35510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.355 ↗
17. Guo X, Guo Q, Li Z. Interfacial strength and deformation mechanism of SiC–Al composite micro-pillars Scripta. Materialia. 2016;114:56–59.
18. 10.1039/C6NR02011A10.1039/C6NR02011A ↗
19. Jarząbek DM, Milczarek M, Wojciechowski T. The effect of metal coatings on the interfacial bonding strength of ceramics to copper in sintered Cu-SiC composites. Ceram Int. 2017;43(6):5283–5291.10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.056 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.03.03610.1016/j.matlet.2016.03.036 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11839710.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118397 ↗
22. Malaki M, Fadaei Tehrani A, Niroumand B, et al. Wettability in metal matrix composites. J Metals. 2021;11(7):1034.10.3390/met11071034 ↗
23. Naidich JV. The wettability of solids by liquid metalsProgress in surface and membrane science. Elsevier. 1981;14:353–484.
24. Chen J, Gu M, Pan F. A model of work of adhesion for reactive metal/ceramic systems. Metall Mater Trans A. 2001;32(8):2033–2038.10.1007/s11661-001-0015-z ↗
25. 10.1163/092764410X49526110.1163/092764410X495261 ↗
26. Fang X, Fan T, Zhang D. Thermodynamic prediction models for work of adhesion in metal/ceramic systems. Mater Rev. 2013;27(11):130–133.
27. Fang X, Fan T, Zhang D. Work of adhesion in Al/SiC composites with alloying element addition. Metall Mater Trans A. 2013;44(11):5192–5201.10.1007/s11661-013-1848-y ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.13810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.138 ↗
29. 10.1080/09276440.2019.167000110.1080/09276440.2019.1670001 ↗
30. Liang T, Kang H, Zhong W. Impact of surface adsorbed gases on hydrogen diffusion into Pd (1 0 0) subsurface from first principles. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;473:476–485.10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.170 ↗
31. Wang C, Chen W, Jia Y, et al. Calculating study on properties of Al (111)/6H-SiC (0001) interfaces. J Metals. 2020;10(9):1197.10.3390/met10091197 ↗
32. Wang C, Chen W, Xie J. Effects of transition element additions on the interfacial interaction and electronic structure of Al (111)/6H-SiC (0001) interface: a first-principles study. J Mater. 2021;14(3):630.10.3390/ma14030630 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.34208210.1063/1.342082 ↗
34. Li HT, Chen LF, Yuan X. Interfacial Stoichiometry and Adhesion at Metal/α–Al2O3 Interfaces. J Am Ceram Soc. 2011;94(s1):154–159.
35. 10.1016/j.susc.2017.12.00910.1016/j.susc.2017.12.009 ↗
36. Zhang F, Li Q, Glazoff MV. First-principles study of interfaces in Al/SiC metal-matrix composite system. Comput Mater Sci. 2023;229:112444.10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112444 ↗
37. Wang C, Chang D, Jia Y. Electronic and mechanical properties of Al (100)/6H–SiC (0001) interfaces: a first-principles study. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(12):126316.10.1088/2053-1591/ab5d4b ↗
38. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10960810.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109608 ↗
39. 10.3390/molecules2811434510.3390/molecules28114345 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.10310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.103 ↗
41. 10.3390/ma1706132210.3390/ma17061322 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16355510.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163555 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11249-021-01414-010.1007/s11249-021-01414-0 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10541910.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105419 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.10181510.1016/j.surfin.2022.101815 ↗
46. Tahani M, Postek E, Sadowski T. Molecular dynamics study of interdiffusion for cubic and hexagonal SiC/Al interfaces [J]. Crystals. 2022;13(1):46.10.3390/cryst13010046 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cja.2024.09.04110.1016/j.cja.2024.09.041 ↗
48. Xie L, Sun T, He C. Enhancement of toughness of SiC through compositing SiC–Al interpenetrating phase composites. Nanotechnology. 2020;31(13):135706.10.1088/1361-6528/ab6468 ↗
49. Shaowen G, Libo L, Guangyu Z, et al. Adhesion analysis of electroless ni coating on SiCp/AI composite mirror substrate. Rare Metal MaterEng. 2008;06(6):960–963.10.1016/S1875-5372(09)60029-1 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.02910.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.029 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10899610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108996 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14181710.1016/j.msea.2021.141817 ↗
53. Zhan JM, Yao XH, Han F. An approach of peridynamic modeling associated with molecular dynamics for fracture simulation of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Struct. 2020;250:112613.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112613 ↗
54. Zhan J, Yao X, Han F. A rate-dependent peridynamic model for predicting the dynamic response of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Struct. 2021;263:113673.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113673 ↗
55. Feng K, Wang J, Hao S. Molecular dynamics study of interfacial micromechanical behaviors of 6H-SiCp/AI composites under uniaxial tensile deformation. Nanomaterials. 2023;13(3):404.10.3390/nano13030404 ↗
56. Dandekar CR, Shin YC. Multi-scale modeling to predict sub-surface damage applied to laser-assisted machining of a particulate reinforced metal matrix composite. J Mater Process Technol. 2013;213(2):153–160.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.09.010 ↗
57. 10.3390/molecules2802074410.3390/molecules28020744 ↗
58. 10.1002/pat.518810.1002/pat.5188 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.10381710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103817 ↗
60. Liu B, Yang J. Mg on adhesion of Al (111)/3C-SiC (111) interfaces from first principles study. J Alloys Compd. 2019;791:530–539.10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.300 ↗
61. 10.3390/molecules2819675710.3390/molecules28196757 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.10221010.1016/j.surfin.2022.102210 ↗
63. Zhao W, Yang Y, Wang C, et al. Parameter inversion for composite interlayer cohesive zone mode based on bayesian inference. J Mech Eng. 2022;58(6):110–118.10.3901/JME.2022.06.110 ↗
64. Wang Y, Wei W, He X, et al. Effects of strength and distribution of SiC on the mechanical properties of SiCp/Al composites. J Mater. 2022;15(4):1288.10.3390/ma15041288 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10384810.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103848 ↗
66. Ghandehariun A, Nazzal M, Kishawy HA. On modeling the deformations and tool-workpiece interactions during machining metal matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;91(5–8):1507–1516.10.1007/s00170-016-9776-9 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.001 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10716210.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107162 ↗
69. Xiaolong G, Yin Y, Shaohua C. A new method for predicting the interfacial mechanical property in particle-reinforced composites. Chinese J Theor Appl Mech. 2021;53(5):1334–1344.
70. 10.1007/s00170-014-6715-510.1007/s00170-014-6715-5 ↗
71. 10.1177/002199831988911010.1177/0021998319889110 ↗
72. Lin XH, Kang YL, Qin QH. Identification of interfacial parameters in a particle reinforced metal matrix composite Al6061–10% Al2O3 by hybrid method and genetic algorithm. Comput Mater Sci. 2005;32(1):47–56.10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.04.006 ↗
73. 10.1080/09276440.2020.184611410.1080/09276440.2020.1846114 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.00410.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.004 ↗
75. Chawla N, Ganesh VV, Wunsch B. Three-dimensional (3D) microstructure visualization and finite element modeling of the mechanical behavior of SiC particle reinforced aluminum composites. Scr Mater. 2004;51(2):161–165.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.03.043 ↗
76. Lei S, Li J, Guo Y. 3D Microstructure modeling and mechanical behavior simulation of SiCp/AI composite. Hot Working Technol. 2017;10:121–125.
77. Zhang J, Ouyang Q, Guo Q. 3D Microstructure-based finite element modeling of deformation and fracture of SiCp/Al composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2016;123:1–9.10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.014 ↗
78. Wang H, Ji G, Xue Y. Numerical simulation of the mechanical properties and fracture of SiCp/6061Al composite materials based on microstructure. Metals. 2023;13(6):1016.10.3390/met13061016 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.02410.1016/j.msea.2014.01.024 ↗
80. 10.1016/0010-4361(94)90105-810.1016/0010-4361(94)90105-8 ↗
81. Gang C Yutao Z Zhenya Z et al. (2012) A testing method for interface bonding strength of particle reinforced metal matrix composite materials. Accessed 2012 Jun 13. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=WdAl4K16JyWvvpdcfXxxT4_slnGofMWNExmmqJkvQNaQxtRfl2HAedYgD2yc_iuy4rUdKoU5miET-cQUx240ek1pco9C-CdYQ9Cev9a6lM4ZEKs8ZugOvK5oYtG1NitVb3wJjEMiA3M=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
82. 10.1002/adem.20210024610.1002/adem.202100246 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.msea.2024.14700310.1016/j.msea.2024.147003 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.00110.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.001 ↗
85. 10.1007/s10443-023-10188-810.1007/s10443-023-10188-8 ↗