Higher compressive strengths and the Bauschinger effect in conformally passivated copper nanopillars
Source abstract
Abstract
Our current understanding of size-dependent strength in nano- and microscale crystals is centered around the idea that the overall strength is determined by the stress required to propagate dislocation sources. The nature and type of these dislocation sources is the subject of extensive debate, however, one commonality amongst these theories is that the ability of the free surface to absorb dislocations is a necessary condition for transition to a source controlled regime. In this work we demonstrate that atomic layer deposition (ALD) of conformal 5–25 nm thick TiO_2/Al_(2)O_3 coatings onto electroplated single crystalline copper pillars with diameters ranging from 75 nm to 1 μm generally inhibits the ability of a dislocation to vanish at the free surface. Uniaxial compression tests reveal increased strength and hardening relative to uncoated pillars at equivalent diameters, as well as a notable recovery of plastic strain during unloading, i.e. the Bauschinger effect. Unlike previous reports, these coated pillars retained the stochastic signature in their stress–strain curves. We explain these observations within the framework of a size-dependent strength theory based on a single arm source model, dislocation theory, and microstructural analysis by transmission electron microscopy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
2. Greer · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 182110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031 ↗
3. Volkert · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 556710.1080/14786430600567739 ↗
4. Uchic · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2009 · 39 · 36110.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145422 ↗
5. Dehm · Prog Mater Sci · 2009 · 54 · 66410.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.005 ↗
6. Kraft · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2010 · 40 · 29310.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145409 ↗
7. Greer · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
8. Jennings · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 104 · 4
9. Jennings · Philos Mag · 2011 · 91 · 110810.1080/14786435.2010.505180 ↗
10. Jennings · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 562710.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.038 ↗
11. Dimiduk · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 406510.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.023 ↗
12. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 58010.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.015 ↗
13. Lee · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 440410.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.002 ↗
14. Norfleet · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 298810.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.046 ↗
15. Greer · Adv Funct Mater · 2009 · 19 · 288010.1002/adfm.200900854 ↗
16. Greer · JOM · 2009 · 61 · 1910.1007/s11837-009-0174-8 ↗
17. Greer · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
18. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 132810.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.065 ↗
19. Ng · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 171210.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.016 ↗
20. Shade · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 458010.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.029 ↗
21. Frick · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 489 · 31910.1016/j.msea.2007.12.038 ↗
22. Buzzi · Philos Mag · 2009 · 89 · 86910.1080/14786430902791748 ↗
23. Dietiker · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 218010.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.019 ↗
24. Maass · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 07190510.1063/1.2884688 ↗
25. Maass · Phys Rev Lett · 2007 · 99 · 14550510.1103/PhysRevLett.99.145505 ↗
26. Schneider · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 508 · 24110.1016/j.msea.2009.01.011 ↗
27. Kim · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 10191610.1063/1.2979684 ↗
28. Kim · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 30010.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.04.012 ↗
29. Kim · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 524510.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.027 ↗
30. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 382510.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.003 ↗
31. Lee · Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2010 · 527 · 190310.1016/j.msea.2009.11.020 ↗
32. Senger · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 58710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.031 ↗
33. Weygand · Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2008 · 483–484 · 18810.1016/j.msea.2006.09.183 ↗
34. Senger · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 293710.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.034 ↗
35. El-Awady · Int J Plast · 2011 · 27 · 37210.1016/j.ijplas.2010.06.006 ↗
36. El-Awady · J Mech Phys Solids · 2009 · 57 · 3210.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.004 ↗
37. Parthasarathy · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 31310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.09.016 ↗
38. Rao · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 324510.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.011 ↗
39. Rao · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 477710.1080/14786430701591513 ↗
40. Weinberger · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2008 · 105 · 1430410.1073/pnas.0806118105 ↗
41. Weinberger · J Mech Phys Solids · 2012 · 60 · 8410.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.010 ↗
42. Zhu · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 4
43. Guruprasad · J Mech Phys Solids · 2008 · 56 · 13210.1016/j.jmps.2007.03.009 ↗
44. Guruprasad · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 547710.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.019 ↗
45. Nix · Philos Mag · 2011 · 91 · 108410.1080/14786435.2010.502141 ↗
46. Shan · Nat Mater · 2008 · 7 · 11510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
47. Oh · Nat Mater · 2009 · 8 · 9510.1038/nmat2370 ↗
48. Oh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 555810.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.015 ↗
49. Zheng H, Cao A, Weinberger C, Huang JY, Du K, Wang J, et al. Nat Commun 2010.
50. Maass · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 102710.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.007 ↗
51. Richter · Nano Lett · 2009 · 9 · 304810.1021/nl9015107 ↗
52. Bei · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 39710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.05.010 ↗
53. Bei · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 476210.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.030 ↗
54. Shim · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 50310.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.033 ↗
55. Rao · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 477710.1080/14786430701591513 ↗
56. Lagos · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 106
57. Nicola · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 208910.1016/j.jmps.2006.04.005 ↗
58. Xiang · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 17710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.048 ↗
59. Xiang · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 544910.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.059 ↗
60. Greer JR. Mater Res Soc Symp 2007 [0983-LL08-03].
61. Ng · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 490210.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.053 ↗
62. Zhou · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 109610.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.012 ↗
63. Aran · Mater Sci Eng · 1987 · 89 · L3510.1016/0025-5416(87)90271-0 ↗
64. Burek · Nano Lett · 2010 · 10 · 6910.1021/nl902872w ↗
65. Csikor · Science · 2007 · 318 · 25110.1126/science.1143719 ↗
66. Dimiduk · Science · 2006 · 312 · 118810.1126/science.1123889 ↗
67. Friedman N, Jennings AT, Kim JY, Dahmen K, Greer JR. 2012;submitted for publication.
68. Willams · 1996
69. Ng · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 79610.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.019 ↗
70. Lee SW, Nix WD. Philos Mag 2012.
71. Hirth · 1982
72. Meyers · 1999
73. Ng · Philos Mag · 2008 · 88 · 67710.1080/14786430801953126 ↗
74. Nicola · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 93 · 592010.1063/1.1566471 ↗
75. Nicola · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 208910.1016/j.jmps.2006.04.005 ↗
76. Rao · Philos Mag A Phys Condens Matter Struct Def Mech Prop · 2000 · 80 · 2011
77. Koehler · Phys Rev B · 1970 · 2 · 54710.1103/PhysRevB.2.547 ↗