Enhanced formability of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass in a supercooled liquid state by vibrational loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Vibrational loading was introduced as an innovative method to improve the thermoplastic formability of Zr 35 Ti 30 Be 26.75 Cu 8.25 bulk metallic glass in a supercooled liquid state. The tensile strain, as a measure to characterize the formability, increased with increasing loading frequency, indicating a vibrational loading facilitated formability. The physical mechanism of this phenomenon was rationalized on the basis of both theoretical analysis and finite-element-method simulation. The theoretical analysis revealed that a more homogeneous distribution of flowing units with a smaller volume, together with a larger free volume concentration, existed in the specimen under relatively higher loading frequencies. The finite-element-method simulation combined with the free volume constitutive relation exhibited an increase in free volume concentration with increasing loading frequency, in agreement with theoretical analysis. Finally, compressive and hot-embossing tests under vibrational loading were carried out to further verify the applicability of this technique. The present results not only provide an effective method to facilitate the thermoplastic formability of bulk metallic glasses, especially in micro/nanoscale forming, but also offer a better understanding of the structural evolution of the metallic supercooled liquid under vibrational loading.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
2. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 224310.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.027 ↗
3. Kumar · Adv Mater · 2011 · 23 · 46110.1002/adma.201002148 ↗
4. Greer · Science · 1995 · 267 · 194710.1126/science.267.5206.1947 ↗
5. Schroers · Adv Mater · 2009 · 21 · 1
6. Wang · Adv Mater · 2009 · 21 · 452410.1002/adma.200901053 ↗
7. Chen · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2008 · 38 · 44510.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130226 ↗
8. Kumar · Nat Commun · 2013 · 4 · 153610.1038/ncomms2546 ↗
9. Schroers · J Microelectromech Syst · 2007 · 16 · 24010.1109/JMEMS.0007.892889 ↗
10. Inoue · Adv Mater · 2000 · 48 · 279
11. Saotome · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 154110.1016/S1359-6462(01)00837-5 ↗
12. Schroers · Adv Mater · 2010 · 22 · 156610.1002/adma.200902776 ↗
13. Sekol · Small · 2012 · 24 · 2081
14. Kawamura · Appl Phys Lett · 1995 · 67 · 200810.1063/1.114769 ↗
15. Nishiyama · Mater Trans Jim · 1999 · 40 · 6410.2320/matertrans1989.40.64 ↗
16. Bourne · J Mater Proc Tech · 2009 · 209 · 476510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.12.003 ↗
17. Saotome · J Mater Process Technol · 2001 · 113 · 6410.1016/S0924-0136(01)00605-7 ↗
18. Saotome · J Mater Process Technol · 2001 · 119 · 30710.1016/S0924-0136(01)00957-8 ↗
19. Sharma · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 03530210.1088/0957-4484/18/3/035302 ↗
20. Chu · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 03410110.1063/1.2431710 ↗
21. Bardt · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 33910.1557/jmr.2007.0035 ↗
22. Henann · J Micromech Microeng · 2009 · 19 · 11503010.1088/0960-1317/19/11/115030 ↗
23. Wiest · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 16010.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.09.021 ↗
24. Schroers · JOM · 2005 · 57 · 3510.1007/s11837-005-0093-2 ↗
25. Kumar · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 03190110.1063/1.2834712 ↗
26. Kumar · Nature · 2009 · 457 · 86810.1038/nature07718 ↗
27. Sarac · Adv Funct Mater · 2012 · 22 · 316110.1002/adfm.201200539 ↗
28. Schroers · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 34110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.033 ↗
29. Kumar · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 97 · 10190710.1063/1.3485298 ↗
30. Li · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 192110.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.013 ↗
31. Li · Appl Phys Lett · 2013 · 102 · 25160310.1063/1.4812480 ↗
32. Xia · Appl Phys Lett · 2012 · 101 · 08160110.1063/1.4747327 ↗
33. He · Intermetallics · 2012 · 21 · 5010.1016/j.intermet.2011.10.001 ↗
34. Kumar · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 10530110.1088/0957-4484/24/10/105301 ↗
35. Geiger · CIRP Ann – Manuf Technol · 2001 · 50 · 44510.1016/S0007-8506(07)62991-6 ↗
36. Schroers · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 449–451 · 89810.1016/j.msea.2006.02.398 ↗
37. Ding · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 110 · 04350810.1063/1.3615630 ↗
38. Saotome · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 304–306 · 71610.1016/S0921-5093(00)01593-8 ↗
39. Saotome · Intermetallics · 2002 · 10 · 124110.1016/S0966-9795(02)00135-8 ↗
40. Schroers · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 47110.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.008 ↗
41. Pitt · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 110 · 04351810.1063/1.3624666 ↗
42. Sarac · J Microelectromech Syst · 2011 · 20 · 2810.1109/JMEMS.2010.2090495 ↗
43. Hung · Int J Prec Eng Manuf · 2012 · 13 · 210310.1007/s12541-012-0278-x ↗
44. Yao · Mater Manuf Proc · 2013 · 28 · 58410.1080/10426914.2012.667890 ↗
45. Daud · Ultrasonics · 2006 · 44 · e51110.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.116 ↗
46. Ichitsubo · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 24550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.245501 ↗
47. Ichitsubo · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 42310.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.027 ↗
48. Ichitsubo · Mater Trans · 2004 · 45 · 118910.2320/matertrans.45.1189 ↗
49. Duan · Adv Mater · 2007 · 19 · 427210.1002/adma.200700969 ↗
50. Liu · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 910.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.03.009 ↗
51. Yu · Phys Rev Lett · 2012 · 109 · 09550810.1103/PhysRevLett.109.095508 ↗
52. Wang · J Phys Condens Matter · 2011 · 23 · 14220210.1088/0953-8984/23/14/142202 ↗
53. Liu · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 592810.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.025 ↗
54. Zhao · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 07192010.1063/1.2337876 ↗
55. Huo · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 432910.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.004 ↗
56. Fujita · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 374110.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.032 ↗
57. Liu · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 106 · 12550410.1103/PhysRevLett.106.125504 ↗
58. Wagner · Nat Mater · 2011 · 10 · 43910.1038/nmat3024 ↗
59. Dmowski · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 105 · 20550210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.205502 ↗
60. Yu · Mater Today · 2013 · 16 · 18310.1016/j.mattod.2013.05.002 ↗
61. Zhao · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 17420110.1103/PhysRevB.75.174201 ↗
62. Demetriou · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 375–377 · 27010.1016/j.msea.2003.10.316 ↗
63. Johnson · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 19550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.195501 ↗
64. Harmon · Phys Rev Lett · 2007 · 99 · 13550210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.135502 ↗
65. Mayers · 2009
66. Wang · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 110 · 05352110.1063/1.3632972 ↗
67. Li · Philos Mag · 2013 · 93 · 185910.1080/14786435.2012.762470 ↗
68. Heggen · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 03350610.1063/1.1827344 ↗
69. Spaepen · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
70. Jun · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 426710.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.020 ↗
71. Kim · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 381310.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.031 ↗