journal article·2009-10

Microstructure dependence of a Cu–38Zn alloy on processing conditions of constrained groove pressing

Kaiping Peng, Ying Zhang, Leon L. Shaw, K.-W. Qian

Acta Materialia· Volume 57· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Grain reduction and the rate of grain refinement as a function of the processing conditions of constrained groove pressing (CGP) for a Cu–38Zn alloy is investigated. It is found that during the early stage of CGP more effective grain refinement can be achieved using the pressing die with narrower groove widths. Similarly, during this stage the cross-orientation pressing procedure results in finer grains than the single-orientation pressing procedure even though both pressings have the same plastic strain. However, the grain sizes from different pressing conditions merge at large plastic strains. These phenomena have been interpreted based on the complexity of the deformation field and the change of the dislocation generation rate over multiple pressing cycles. The result of this study demonstrates that the rate of grain refinement is affected by the complexity of the deformation field.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Tsuji · Scr Mater · 1999 · 40 · 79510.1016/S1359-6462(99)00015-9 ↗
2. Saito · Scr Mater · 1998 · 39 · 122110.1016/S1359-6462(98)00302-9 ↗
3. Zhu · Mater Trans A · 2001 · 32 · 155910.1007/s11661-001-0245-0 ↗
4. Huang · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 149710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00069-6 ↗
5. Huang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 371 · 3510.1016/S0921-5093(03)00114-X ↗
6. Shin · Mater Sci Eng A · 2002 · 328 · 9810.1016/S0921-5093(01)01665-3 ↗
7. Krishnaiah · Scr Mater · 2005 · 52 · 122910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.001 ↗
8. Krishnaiah · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 410-411 · 33710.1016/j.msea.2005.08.101 ↗
9. Park · J Mater Proc Technol · 2005 · 169 · 29910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.12.015 ↗
10. Lee · J Mater Proc Technol · 2002 · 130-131 · 20810.1016/S0924-0136(02)00722-7 ↗
11. Peng · Scr Mater · 2007 · 56 · 98710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.043 ↗
12. DeHoff · Metals Forum · 1982 · 5 · 4
13. Ortiz · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 41310.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.003 ↗
14. Zhilyaev · Prog Mater Sci · 2008 · 53 · 89310.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.002 ↗
15. Zhilyaev · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 75310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00466-4 ↗
16. Carter · Phil Mag · 1977 · 35 · 18910.1080/14786437708235982 ↗
17. Valiev · Prog Mater Sci · 2000 · 45 · 10310.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
18. Huang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 161910.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.017 ↗
19. Hebesberger · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 39310.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.043 ↗
20. Jazaeri · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 323910.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.030 ↗
21. Bowen · Mater Sci Technol · 2000 · 16 · 124610.1179/026708300101507208 ↗
22. Balogh · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 80910.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.053 ↗
23. Meyers · 1984
24. Valiev · Prog Mater Sci · 2006 · 51 · 88110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
25. Yamashita · Mater Sci Eng · 2000 · A287 · 10010.1016/S0921-5093(00)00836-4 ↗
26. Chen · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 200510.1016/S1359-6454(02)00607-9 ↗
27. Apps · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 49910.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.042 ↗
28. Apps · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 281110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00086-7 ↗
29. Avitzur · 1968