The five-parameter grain boundary character and energy distributions of a fully austenitic high-manganese steel using three dimensional data
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The three-dimensional interfacial grain boundary network in a fully austenitic high-manganese steel was studied as a function of all five macroscopic crystallographic parameters (i.e. lattice misorientation and grain boundary plane normal) using electron backscattering diffraction mapping in conjunction with focused ion beam serial sectioning. The relative grain boundary area and energy distributions were strongly influenced by both the grain boundary plane orientation and the lattice misorientation. Grain boundaries terminated by (1 1 1) plane orientations revealed relatively higher populations and lower energies compared with other boundaries. The most frequently observed grain boundaries were {1 1 1} symmetric twist boundaries with the Σ3 misorientation, which also had the lowest energy. On average, the relative areas of different grain boundary types were inversely correlated to their energies. A comparison between the current result and previously reported observations (e.g. high-purity Ni) revealed that polycrystals with the same atomic structure (e.g. face-centered cubic) have very similar grain boundary character and energy distributions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Beladi · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 778710.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.031 ↗
2. Remy · Mater Sci Eng · 1976 · 26 · 12310.1016/0025-5416(76)90234-2 ↗
3. Mahajan · Acta Metall · 1973 · 21 · 135310.1016/0001-6160(73)90085-0 ↗
4. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
5. Karaman · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 134510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00383-3 ↗
6. Beladi · Acta Mater · 2010 · 5810.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.026 ↗
7. Kashyap · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 238310.1016/S1359-6454(96)00341-2 ↗
8. Saylor · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 367510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00182-4 ↗
9. Dillon · J Am Ceram Soc · 2009 · 92 · 158010.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03064.x ↗
10. Li · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 430410.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.004 ↗
11. Beladi · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 140410.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.017 ↗
12. Rohrer · Z Metallkd · 2004 · 95 · 19710.3139/146.017934 ↗
13. Read · Phys Rev · 1950 · 78 · 27510.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
14. Gjostein · Acta Metall · 1959 · 7 · 31910.1016/0001-6160(59)90198-1 ↗
15. Hasson · Scripta Metall · 1971 · 5 · 88910.1016/0036-9748(71)90064-0 ↗
16. Hasson · Surf Sci · 1972 · 31 · 11510.1016/0039-6028(72)90256-7 ↗
17. McLean · J Mater Sci · 1973 · 8 · 57110.1007/BF00550462 ↗
18. Chan · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 111310.1016/0001-6160(85)90205-6 ↗
19. Chan · Acta Metall · 1985 · 34 · 219110.1016/0001-6160(86)90164-1 ↗
20. Schmelzle · Scripta Metall Mater · 1991 · 25 · 198110.1016/0956-716X(91)90339-3 ↗
21. Wolf · Philos Mag A · 1992 · 66 · 99110.1080/01418619208248003 ↗
22. Miura · J Mater Sci Lett · 1994 · 13 · 4610.1007/BF02352916 ↗
23. Straumal · Interface Sci · 2001 · 9 · 28710.1023/A:1015174921561 ↗
24. Skidmore · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 87310.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.12.004 ↗
25. Amouyal · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 379510.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.043 ↗
26. Barmak · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 105910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.060 ↗
27. Amouyal · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 668110.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.023 ↗
28. Humphreys · 2004
29. Sato · ISIJ Int · 1989 · 29 · 86810.2355/isijinternational.29.868 ↗
30. Morawiec · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 352510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00126-9 ↗
31. Vercammen · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 200510.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.040 ↗
32. Gruber · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 35110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.004 ↗
33. Rohrer · 2009 · vol. 201 · 343
34. Gruber · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 1410.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.032 ↗
35. Dillon · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.062 ↗
36. Holm · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 525010.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.001 ↗
37. Brandon · Acta Metall · 1966 · 14 · 147910.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
38. Rohrer · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 448910.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.035 ↗
39. Randle · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 524 · 13410.1016/j.msea.2009.06.018 ↗
40. Beladi · Acta Mater · 2014 · 63 · 8610.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.010 ↗
41. Randle · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 18310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.044 ↗
42. Watanabe · Acta Metall · 1989 · 37 · 94110.1016/0001-6160(89)90021-7 ↗
43. Randle · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 418710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3 ↗
44. Allain · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 387–389 · 15810.1016/j.msea.2004.01.059 ↗
45. Saeed-Akbari · Metall Mater Trans A · 2009 · 40 · 307610.1007/s11661-009-0050-8 ↗
46. Shang · J Phy Condens Matter · 2012 · 24 · 1
47. Saylor · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 364910.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.018 ↗
48. Tschopp · 2008 · 4310.1016/S1572-4859(07)00002-2 ↗