Nanovoid deformation in aluminum under simple shear
Source abstract
Abstract
We analyze the mechanisms underlying the deformation of a nanovoid in an Al crystal subjected to cyclic shear deformation using numerical simulations. Boundary and cell-size effects have been minimized by means of the quasicontinuum method. The deformation of the void entails a noticeable reduction in volume. During the loading phase, our analysis reveals several stages of stress buildup separated by yield points. The main mechanisms underlying the deformation of the crystal are: glide of primary and secondary partial dislocation loops with mixed edge-screw character; intersection of primary and secondary loops to form jogs and junctions; cross-slip; and dislocation multiplication and annihilation. Cross-slip occurs by the Fleischer mechanism and not by the more commonly assumed Friedel–Escaig mechanism. During unloading, most of the dislocation population and void volume reduction is recovered by re-absorption of dislocation loops and annihilation mediated by cross slip. However, a residual dislocation density remains around the void at the end of the unloading process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Antoun · 2003
2. Loveridge-Smith · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 86 · 234910.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2349 ↗
3. Ortiz · J Appl Mech – Trans ASME · 1992 · 59 · 4810.1115/1.2899463 ↗
4. Belak · J Comput-Aided Mater Des · 1998 · 5 · 19310.1023/A:1008685029849 ↗
5. Strachan · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 06010310.1103/PhysRevB.63.060103 ↗
6. Rudd · Comput Mater Sci · 2001 · 24 · 14810.1016/S0927-0256(02)00181-7 ↗
7. Seppälä · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 13410110.1103/PhysRevB.69.134101 ↗
8. Marian · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 16550310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.165503 ↗
9. Tvergaard · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 15710.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
10. Bai · 1992
11. Tadmor · Philos Mag A · 1996 · 73 · 152910.1080/01418619608243000 ↗
12. Tadmor · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 452910.1021/la9508912 ↗
13. Ercolessi · Europhys Lett · 1994 · 26 · 58310.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 ↗
14. Fleischer · Acta Metall · 1959 · 7 · 13410.1016/0001-6160(59)90122-1 ↗
15. Friedel · 1957
16. Escaig · 1968 · 655
17. Knap · J Mech Phys Solids · 2001 · 49 · 189910.1016/S0022-5096(01)00034-5 ↗
18. Press · 2002
19. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
20. Hirth · J Appl Phys · 1960 · 32 · 70010.1063/1.1736074 ↗
21. Rasmussen · Philos Mag A · 2000 · 80 · 127310.1080/01418610008212115 ↗
22. Hull · 1984
23. Lu · Phys Rev Lett · 2002 · 89 · 10550110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.105501 ↗
24. Benoit · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 164 · 4210.1016/0921-5093(93)90642-R ↗
25. Fleck · Proc Roy Soc A · 1986 · 407 · 43510.1098/rspa.1986.0104 ↗