Formation mechanism of texture during dynamic recrystallization in γ-TiAl, nickel and copper examined by microstructure observation and grain boundary analysis based on local orientation measurements
Source abstract
Abstract
Texture formation in γ-TiAl, nickel and copper during dynamic recrystallization (DRX) in compression deformation is studied. The formation process is discussed in relation to the mechanism of new grain formation during DRX. It is found that the behavior of texture formation varies depending on Z (the value of the Zener-Hollomon parameter) and the kind of material. During deformation in low Z conditions, sharp fiber texture develops in γ-TiAl, suggesting that strain-induced grain boundary migration is predominant in the new grain formation. No sharp texture is seen in nickel and copper after the dynamic recrystallization in low Z conditions. However, microstructure observation suggests that new grains are also generated by strain-induced grain boundary migration in these two pure metals. It is found that the difference of texture formation between γ-TiAl and the other two pure metals is ascribed to the difference in the frequency of twinning during grain boundary migration; texture develops only when the frequency is low, which is the case of γ-TiAl.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Luton · Acta Metall · 1969 · 17 · 103310.1016/0001-6160(69)90049-2 ↗
2. Sah · Metal Sci · 1974 · 8 · 32510.1179/msc.1974.8.1.325 ↗
3. Roberts · Metal Sci · 1979 · 13 · 19510.1016/0036-9748(79)90292-8 ↗
4. Weiss · Metal Sci · 1984 · 18 · 7710.1179/030634584790420249 ↗
5. Sakai · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 18910.1016/0001-6160(84)90049-X ↗
6. Maki · J Iron Steel Inst Japan · 1984 · 70 · 207310.2355/tetsutohagane1955.70.15_2073 ↗
7. Fukutomi · Z Metallkd · 1990 · 81 · 272
8. Fukutomi · Mater Trans JIM · 1994 · 35 · 79410.2320/matertrans1989.35.794 ↗
9. Inoue · J Japan Inst Light Metals · 1994 · 44 · 64610.2464/jilm.44.646 ↗
10. Tsuji · 2000
11. Baczynski · Metall and Mater Trans A · 1998 · 29A · 44710.1007/s11661-998-0125-y ↗
12. Fukutomi · J Japan Inst Metals · 2001 · 65 · 7110.2320/jinstmet1952.65.2_71 ↗
13. Kroll · Z Metallkd · 1992 · 83 · 591
14. Hoffman · Trans AIME · 1956 · 206 · 483
15. Kuper · Phys Rev · 1954 · 96 · 122410.1103/PhysRev.96.1224 ↗
16. Dahms · J Appl Cryst · 1989 · 22 · 43910.1107/S0021889889005261 ↗
17. Hug · Phil Mag · 1988 · A57 · 49910.1080/01418618808204682 ↗
18. Simikin · Intermetallics · 2003 · 11 · 21510.1016/S0966-9795(02)00236-4 ↗
19. Barrett · Trans AIME · 1940 · 137 · 112
20. Hasegawa · Mater Trans · 2002 · 43 · 224310.2320/matertrans.43.2243 ↗
21. Hartig · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 188310.1016/0956-7151(92)90175-E ↗
22. Bartels · Mater Sci Eng A · 1997 · 239–240 · 1410.1016/S0921-5093(97)00556-X ↗
23. Hasegawa M. Doctor’s thesis, 2002, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan.
24. Gottstein · Acta Metall · 1983 · 31 · 17510.1016/0001-6160(83)90077-9 ↗
25. Gottstein · Metal Sci · 1979 · 13 · 22310.1179/msc.1979.13.3-4.223 ↗
26. Furubayashi · J Iron Steel Inst Japan · 1982 · 68 · 250710.2355/tetsutohagane1955.68.16_2507 ↗
27. Gottstein · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 111710.1016/0001-6160(84)90015-4 ↗
28. Ponge · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 6910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00233-4 ↗
29. Hasegawa · Mater Trans · 2002 · 43 · 118310.2320/matertrans.43.1183 ↗