Sample shape and temperature strongly influence the yield strength of metallic nanopillars
Source abstract
Abstract
For bulk face-centered cubic metals in conventional tests, the effects of sample shape on the yield stress are negligibly small, and the strength dependence on temperature is very weak. Using molecular dynamics simulations, here we demonstrate marked differences in yield stress for Cu pillars with different cross-sectional geometries, or tested at different temperatures, when the sample dimensions are on the nanometer scale. The origin of this change in yield behavior from conventional bulk Cu is explained by analyzing dislocation emission from the surfaces and corners as the mechanism to mediate plasticity. Based on a systematic characterization of the surface structure, atomic-level stresses and strains, a local strain criterion is proposed for yielding in such nanoscale objects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
2. Greer · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 182110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031 ↗
3. Gall · Nano Lett · 2004 · 4 · 243110.1021/nl048456s ↗
4. Shan · Nat Mater · 2007 · 7 · 11510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
5. Greer · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
6. Cao · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 21910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.03.010 ↗
7. Diao · Nano Lett · 2004 · 4 · 186310.1021/nl0489992 ↗
8. Diao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 64310.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.008 ↗
9. Liang · Nano Lett · 2005 · 5 · 203910.1021/nl0515910 ↗
10. Liang · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 11540910.1103/PhysRevB.73.115409 ↗
11. Park · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 25550410.1103/PhysRevLett.95.255504 ↗
12. Wong · Science · 1997 · 277 · 197110.1126/science.277.5334.1971 ↗
13. Sun · Science · 2002 · 298 · 217610.1126/science.1077229 ↗
14. Xia · Adv Mater · 2003 · 15 · 35310.1002/adma.200390087 ↗
15. Chen · Nano Lett · 2002 · 2 · 100310.1021/nl025674h ↗
16. Sun · Nano Lett · 2003 · 3 · 156910.1021/nl034765r ↗
17. Wu · Nature · 2004 · 430 · 6110.1038/nature02674 ↗
18. Park · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 186210.1016/j.jmps.2006.03.006 ↗
19. Cao · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 74 · 21410810.1103/PhysRevB.74.214108 ↗
20. Cao · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 15190910.1063/1.2721367 ↗
21. Cao · Phys Rev B · 2008 · 77 · 19542910.1103/PhysRevB.77.195429 ↗
22. Rabkin · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 208510.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.058 ↗
23. Zhu · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 03550210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.035502 ↗
24. Dieter · 1986
25. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 275010.1063/1.1799238 ↗
26. Wang · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 271510.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.013 ↗
27. Tian · Nano Lett · 2003 · 3 · 91910.1021/nl034217d ↗
28. Wang · J Phys Chem B · 2004 · 108 · 84110.1021/jp035068q ↗
29. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
30. Ogata · Science · 2002 · 298 · 80710.1126/science.1076652 ↗
31. Nosé · Mol Phys · 1984 · 52 · 25510.1080/00268978400101201 ↗
32. Hoover · Phys Rev A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
33. Cheung · J Appl Phys · 1991 · 70 · 568810.1063/1.350186 ↗
34. Ji · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 30570410.1088/0957-4484/18/30/305704 ↗
35. Zimmerman · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 16550710.1103/PhysRevLett.87.165507 ↗
36. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
37. Chadwick · 1976
38. Honeycutt · J Phys Chem · 1987 · 91 · 495010.1021/j100303a014 ↗
39. Chang · J Appl Phys · 1966 · 37 · 356710.1063/1.1708903 ↗
40. Wigley · 1971
41. Wang · Adv Mater · 2004 · 16 · 32810.1002/adma.200305679 ↗
42. Plimpton · J Comput Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗