journal article·2010-04

On intrinsic brittleness and ductility of intergranular fracture along symmetrical tilt grain boundaries in copper

Y. Cheng, Z.-H. Jin, Y.W. Zhang, H. Gao

Acta Materialia· Volume 58· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The intrinsic brittleness and ductility of intergranular fracture along a number of symmetrical [1 1 0] tilt grain boundaries (GBs) in Cu are investigated via combined atomistic and continuum studies of dislocation nucleation from an atomically sharp crack tip. In all cases investigated, the classical model of Rice predicts a directional anisotropy in that, along a given GB, brittle cleavage is favored for crack propagation in one direction while dislocation emission from the crack tip is preferred in the opposite direction. This prediction is validated by atomistic simulations of crack propagation along coherent GBs, including Σ 3 ( 1 1 ¯ 1 ) and Σ 11 ( 1 1 ¯ 3 ) . However, for incoherent GBs such as Σ 9 ( 2 2 ¯ 1 ) , Σ 9 ( 1 1 ¯ 4 ) and Σ 11 ( 3 3 ¯ 2 ) , such directional anisotropy in intrinsic ductility is not observed; instead, we show that dislocation emission is favored in both crack propagation directions. The reason for this discrepancy is shown to be dislocation emission at a distance ahead of the crack tip along an incoherent GB, which violates the assumption in Rice’s model that dislocation emission occurs directly at the crack tip.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Koch · Scr Mater · 2003 · 49 · 65710.1016/S1359-6462(03)00394-4 ↗
2. Wang · Nature · 2002 · 419 · 91210.1038/nature01133 ↗
3. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
4. Li · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 23010.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.020 ↗
5. Lu · Science · 2009 · 323 · 60710.1126/science.1167641 ↗
6. Lu · Science · 2009 · 324 · 34910.1126/science.1159610 ↗
7. Duscher · Nature Mater · 2004 · 3 · 62110.1038/nmat1191 ↗
8. Schweinfest · Nature · 2004 · 432 · 100810.1038/nature03198 ↗
9. Heinz · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 193310.1016/0956-7151(90)90305-Z ↗
10. Zhang · J Mater Res · 2005 · 20 · 20110.1557/JMR.2005.0019 ↗
11. Hasnaoui · Science · 2003 · 300 · 155010.1126/science.1084284 ↗
12. Frederiksen · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 501910.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.025 ↗
13. Cao · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76 · 02411310.1103/PhysRevB.76.024113 ↗
14. Shenderova · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 61 · 387710.1103/PhysRevB.61.3877 ↗
15. Zener · 1948 · 3
16. Stroh · Proc Roy Soc Lond A · 1954 · 223 · 40410.1098/rspa.1954.0124 ↗
17. Zhang · Prog Mater Sci · 2008 · 53 · 102510.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.001 ↗
18. Armstrong · Mater Sci Eng · 1966 · 1 · 25110.1016/0025-5416(66)90036-X ↗
19. Kelly · Philos Mag · 1967 · 15 · 56710.1080/14786436708220903 ↗
20. Rice · Philos Mag · 1974 · 29 · 7310.1080/14786437408213555 ↗
21. Mason · Philos Mag · 1979 · 39 · 45510.1080/01418617908239284 ↗
22. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
23. Cleri · Interface Sci · 1999 · 7 · 4510.1023/A:1008773913030 ↗
24. Yamakov · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 189910.1016/j.jmps.2006.03.004 ↗
25. Griffith · Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond A · 1921 · 221 · 16310.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
26. Thomson · J Appl Phys · 1971 · 42 · 315410.1063/1.1660699 ↗
27. Gumbsch · J Mater Res · 1995 · 10 · 289710.1557/JMR.1995.2897 ↗
28. Gumbsch · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 1510.1557/mrs2000.68 ↗
29. Wang · Acta Metall Mater · 1991 · 39 · 77910.1016/0956-7151(91)90278-9 ↗
30. Wang · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 383710.1016/0956-7151(95)90167-1 ↗
31. Farkas · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 3510.1557/mrs2000.71 ↗
32. Luque · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2007 · 30 · 100810.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01170.x ↗
33. http://www.itap.physik.uni-stuttgart.de/~imd/.
34. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
35. Bitzek · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 97 · 17020110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170201 ↗
36. Li · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · 11 · 17310.1088/0965-0393/11/2/305 ↗
37. Born · 1954
38. Schiøtz · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 1197110.1103/PhysRevB.60.11971 ↗
39. Buehler · Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng · 2004 · 193 · 525710.1016/j.cma.2003.12.066 ↗
40. Zimmerman · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · 12 · S31910.1088/0965-0393/12/4/S03 ↗
41. Nadgornyi · 1988 · vol. 31
42. Zhou · Phys Rev Lett · 1994 · 72 · 85210.1103/PhysRevLett.72.852 ↗
43. Zhou · Phys Rev Lett · 1994 · 73 · 105010.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1050 ↗
44. Sieradzki · Phys Rev Lett · 1994 · 73 · 104910.1103/PhysRevLett.73.1049 ↗
45. Knap · Phys Rev Lett · 1999 · 82 · 170010.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1700 ↗
46. Sun · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 170 · 6710.1016/0921-5093(93)90370-T ↗
47. Gumbsch · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1995 · 3 · 59710.1088/0965-0393/3/5/002 ↗
48. Cleri · Phys Rev Lett · 1997 · 79 · 130910.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1309 ↗
49. Schoeck · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 356 · 9310.1016/S0921-5093(03)00109-6 ↗
50. Poulat · Interface Sci · 2000 · 8 · 510.1023/A:1008729517242 ↗
51. Rittner · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 54 · 699910.1103/PhysRevB.54.6999 ↗
52. Sansoz · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 193110.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.007 ↗
53. Suzuki · Interface Sci · 2003 · 11 · 42510.1023/A:1026195911339 ↗
54. Sansoz · Scr Mater · 2004 · 50 · 128310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.031 ↗
55. Tschopp · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 395910.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.012 ↗
56. Sutton · 1995
57. Farkas · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 38710.1080/147864304123313157070 ↗
58. Guo · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 40110.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.022 ↗
59. Gross · 2006
60. Bitzek · 2007 · 127
61. Zhu · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 02550310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.025503 ↗