Quantitative phase-field modeling for two-phase solidification process involving diffusion in the solid
Source abstract
Abstract
A quantitative phase-field model for two-phase solidification processes is developed based on the antitrapping current approach with the free energy functional formulated to suppress the formation of an extra phase at the interface. This model appropriately recovers the free boundary problem for the motion of interface in the thin-interface limit and, importantly, it is applicable to the solidification process in binary alloy systems with arbitrary values of the solid diffusivities and interfacial energies. The performance of the present model is investigated for the peritectic reaction process in carbon steel. The present model exhibits excellent convergence behavior with respect to the interface thickness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Karma · 2001
2. Chen · Annu Rev Mater Sci · 2002 · 32 · 11310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
3. Steinbach · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 07300110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
4. Steinbach · Physica D · 1996 · 94 · 13510.1016/0167-2789(95)00298-7 ↗
5. Steinbach · Physica D · 1999 · 134 · 38510.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-3 ↗
6. Kim · J Cryst Growth · 2004 · 261 · 13510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.09.017 ↗
7. Boettger · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 269710.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.008 ↗
8. Qin · J Cryst Growth · 2005 · 279 · 16310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.02.005 ↗
9. Eiken · Phys Rev E · 2006 · 73 · 066612210.1103/PhysRevE.73.066122 ↗
10. Almgren · SIAM J Appl Math · 1999 · 59 · 208610.1137/S0036139997330027 ↗
11. Karma · Phys Rev E · 1998 · 57 · 432310.1103/PhysRevE.57.4323 ↗
12. Karma · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 11570110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115701 ↗
13. Echebarria · Phys Rev E · 2004 · 70 · 06160410.1103/PhysRevE.70.061604 ↗
14. Ramirez · Phys Rev E · 2004 · 69 · 05160710.1103/PhysRevE.69.051607 ↗
15. Greenwood · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 69 · 051607
16. Lan · Phys Rev E · 2004 · 69 · 03160110.1103/PhysRevE.69.031601 ↗
17. Ramirez · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 172110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.021 ↗
18. Badillo · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 201510.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.025 ↗
19. Kim · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 439110.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.004 ↗
20. Folch · Phys Rev E · 2005 · 72 · 01160210.1103/PhysRevE.72.011602 ↗
21. Ohno · Phys Rev E · 2009 · 79 · 03160310.1103/PhysRevE.79.031603 ↗
22. Gracke · SIAM J Appl Math · 1999 · 60 · 29510.1137/S0036139998334895 ↗
23. Kim · Phys Rev E · 1999 · 60 · 718610.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
24. Kurz · 1989
25. Sun · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 02010210.1103/PhysRevB.69.020102 ↗
26. Yin · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 152310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00022-1 ↗
27. Matsumiya · Trans ISIJ · 1984 · 24 · 87310.2355/isijinternational1966.24.873 ↗
28. Gustafson · Scand J Metall · 1985 · 14 · 259
29. Boussinot · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 175010.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.017 ↗
30. Ohno M, Matsuura K. submitted for publication.