Unusual size-dependent strengthening mechanisms in helium ion-irradiated immiscible coherent Cu/Co nanolayers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Prior studies on He ion irradiation-induced damage in several immiscible metallic nanolayer systems with incoherent interfaces show a prominent size effect on mitigation of radiation damage frequently. In general, the magnitude of radiation hardening and defect cluster density are both lower in smaller individual layer thickness ( h ) than in larger h , as interfaces can effectively reduce the density of radiation-induced defect clusters. This research shows, however, an opposite size-dependent strengthening behavior in He ion-irradiated immiscible coherent Cu/Co multilayers, i.e. films with smaller h have greater radiation hardening. Such unusual size-dependent strengthening could be explained via a transition of strengthening mechanisms from partial dislocation (before radiation) to full dislocation transmission (after radiation) across layer interfaces as a result of the formation of He bubbles at the layer interfaces. Furthermore, it is shown that, similarly to incoherent immiscible systems, a coherent interface in the immiscible system can also effectively reduce the population of radiation-induced defect clusters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Was · 2007
2. Reed · Radiat. Effects · 1977 · 31 · 12910.1080/00337577708233269 ↗
3. Thomas · Radiat. Effects · 1983 · 78 · 3710.1080/00337578308207358 ↗
4. Lucas · Physica B+C · 1984 · 127 · 22510.1016/S0378-4363(84)80035-2 ↗
5. Han · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 634110.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.009 ↗
6. Yu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 425 · 14010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.052 ↗
7. Zhang · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 7510.1007/s11837-010-0185-5 ↗
8. Demkowicz · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 16 · 10110.1016/j.cossms.2011.10.003 ↗
9. Misra · JOM · 2007 · 59 · 6210.1007/s11837-007-0120-6 ↗
10. Zhernenkov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 24191310.1063/1.3600642 ↗
11. Kashinath · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 08610110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.086101 ↗
12. Shao · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 244810.1038/srep02448 ↗
13. Di · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 85 · 05210110.1103/PhysRevB.84.052101 ↗
14. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 45510.1016/S0022-3115(02)01082-6 ↗
15. Murty · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 383 · 18910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.044 ↗
16. Odette · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
17. Schäublin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 351 · 24710.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.005 ↗
18. Ukai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 74910.1016/S0022-3115(02)01043-7 ↗
19. Sun · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2013 · 44 · 196610.1007/s11661-013-1635-9 ↗
20. Zhang · J. Eng. Mater. Technol. · 2012 · 134 · 04101010.1115/1.4006979 ↗
21. Singh · Philos. Mag. · 1974 · 29 · 2510.1080/14786437408213551 ↗
22. Singh · Philos. Mag. · 1974 · 29 · 84710.1080/14786437408222075 ↗
23. Bai · Science · 2010 · 327 · 163110.1126/science.1183723 ↗
24. Chen · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 145010.1038/srep01450 ↗
25. Yu · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 137710.1038/ncomms2382 ↗
26. Yu · Scr. Mater. · 2013 · 69 · 38510.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.024 ↗
27. Bringa · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 12 · 335110.1021/nl201383u ↗
28. Fu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 19160710.1063/1.4764528 ↗
29. Sun · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 373710.1038/srep03737 ↗
30. Fu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 385 · 62910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.308 ↗
31. Fu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 407 · 17810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.011 ↗
32. Fu · Philos. Mag. · 2013 · 93 · 88310.1080/14786435.2012.735773 ↗
33. Li · Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2010 · 91 · 1810.1080/09500839.2010.522210 ↗
34. Gao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 413 · 1110.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.030 ↗
35. Li · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 12352210.1063/1.3138804 ↗
36. Wei · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 633110.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.043 ↗
37. Wei · Philos. Mag. · 2010 · 91 · 55310.1080/14786435.2010.526647 ↗
38. Heinisch · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 92410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.142 ↗
39. Yu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 440 · 31010.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.069 ↗
40. Yu · Philos. Mag. · 2013 · 93 · 354710.1080/14786435.2013.815378 ↗
41. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 23310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.007 ↗
42. Setyawan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 445 · 26110.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.012 ↗
43. Li · Int. J. Plast. · 2012 · 32 · 110.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.007 ↗
44. Liu · Int. J. Plast. · 2013 · 49 · 15210.1016/j.ijplas.2013.03.005 ↗
45. Liu · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 192410.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.057 ↗
46. Oliver · J. Mater. Res. · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
47. Egerton · 2011
48. Williams · 2009
49. J.F. Ziegler, J.P. Biersack, Calculation using the Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter (SRIM) Code. . (2008).
50. Stoller · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B · 2013 · 310 · 7510.1016/j.nimb.2013.05.008 ↗
51. Wonnell · J. Appl. Phys. · 1992 · 72 · 519510.1063/1.352001 ↗
52. Bufford · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 22311210.1063/1.4768000 ↗
53. Bufford · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2013 · 1 · 5110.1080/21663831.2012.761654 ↗
54. Baibich · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 61 · 247210.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2472 ↗
55. Brandt · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1965 · 14 · 4210.1103/PhysRevLett.14.42 ↗
56. Datz · Nucl. Instrum. Methods · 1965 · 38 · 22110.1016/0029-554X(65)90142-4 ↗
57. Tabor · 2000
58. Mata · J. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 17 · 96410.1557/JMR.2002.0144 ↗
59. Hirth · 1982
60. Duesbery · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1998 · 6 · 3510.1088/0965-0393/6/1/005 ↗
61. Ullmaier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 251 · 26210.1016/S0022-3115(97)00226-2 ↗
62. Kroupa · Discuss. Faraday Soc. · 1964 · 38 · 4910.1039/df9643800049 ↗
63. Anderson · MRS Bull. · 1999 · 24 · 2710.1557/S0883769400051514 ↗