Ductile tensile failure in metals through initiation and growth of nanosized voids
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We here reveal the initiation of ductile failure in metals at the nanometer scale by molecular dynamics simulations coupled with a novel analytical model. This proceeds by the emission of a special type of dislocation shear loop, which can expand as a partial or perfect dislocation, evolve into a prismatic loop through reaction, or develop into twins. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations predict a strong dependence of the stress required for the initiation of plastic flow at the surface of the void for both Cu (a model fcc metal) and Ta (a model bcc metal). The decrease in stress with increasing void size is also analyzed in terms of a new analytical approach based on the energetics of dislocation loop emission. For both fcc (copper) and bcc (tantalum) metals initiation of plastic flow in MD simulations takes place at voids as small as a tri-vacancy (radius R ≈ 0.1 nm). Extensive calculations for tantalum combined with the analytical model, which tracks the simulations, enable extrapolation to R ≈ 300 nm, in the realm of second phase particles and inclusions. Thus we conclude that this is a general mechanism of tensile failure in pure monocrystalline metals where other initiation sites are absent.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Ritchie · J Mech Phys Solids · 1973 · 21 · 39510.1016/0022-5096(73)90008-2 ↗
2. Rice · Philos Mag · 1974 · 29 · 7310.1080/14786437408213555 ↗
3. Weertman · Philos Mag · 1981 · 43 · 110310.1080/01418618108236146 ↗
4. Christy · 1986 · 835
5. Kanel · 1992 · 775
6. Meyers MA. In: Meyers MA, Armstrong RW, Kirchner HOK, editors. Mechanics and materials: fundamentals and linkages. New York: Wiley; 1999. p. 489–594.
7. Edelson · Trans ASM · 1962 · 55 · 230
8. Bringa · Science · 2005 · 309 · 183810.1126/science.1116723 ↗
9. Van Swygenhoven · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 66 · 2410110.1103/PhysRevB.66.024101 ↗
10. Van Swygenhoven · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 197510.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.026 ↗
11. Van Swygenhoven · Appl Phys Lett · 1997 · 71 · 165210.1063/1.119785 ↗
12. Meyers · Prog Mater Sci · 2006 · 51 · 42710.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
13. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 574310.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032 ↗
14. Yamakov · Nat Mater · 2004 · 3 · 4310.1038/nmat1035 ↗
15. Traiviratana · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 387410.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.047 ↗
16. Meyers · J Mater · 2009 · 61 · 35
17. Marian · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 16550310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.165503 ↗
18. Marian · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 289310.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.046 ↗
19. Seppälä · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 71 · 06411210.1103/PhysRevB.71.064112 ↗
20. Bulatov · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 14410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.001 ↗
21. Lubarda · Acta Mater · 2004 · 53 · 139710.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.022 ↗
22. Bringa · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 14810.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.02.038 ↗
23. Tang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 135410.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.001 ↗
24. Bringa · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 445810.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.043 ↗
25. Plimpton · J Comp Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
26. Dai · J Phys Condens Matter · 2006 · 18 · 452710.1088/0953-8984/18/19/008 ↗
27. Tang · AIP Conf Proc · 2012 · 1426 · 125510.1063/1.3686508 ↗
28. Tsuzuki · Comput Phys Comm · 2007 · 177 · 51810.1016/j.cpc.2007.05.018 ↗
29. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
30. Turley · J Phys D Appl Phys · 1971 · 4 · 26410.1088/0022-3727/4/2/312 ↗
31. Moriarty · J Phys Condens Matter · 2002 · 14 · 282510.1088/0953-8984/14/11/305 ↗
32. Finnis · Philos Mag A · 1984 · 50 · 4510.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
33. Ackland · Philos Mag A · 1987 · 56 · 1510.1080/01418618708204464 ↗
34. Rudd · Philos Mag · 2009 · 89 · 313310.1080/14786430903222529 ↗
35. Xu · Comp Mater Sci · 2011 · 50 · 241110.1016/j.commatsci.2011.03.019 ↗
36. Weertman · 1996
37. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
38. Haviland · J Appl Phys · 1971 · 42 · 23810.1063/1.1659574 ↗
39. Schoeck · Philos Mag A · 1994 · 69 · 108510.1080/01418619408242240 ↗
40. Anderson · J Mech Phys Solids · 1987 · 35 · 74310.1016/0022-5096(87)90053-6 ↗
41. Wolfer · Philos Mag A · 1988 · 57 · 92310.1080/01418618808204526 ↗
42. Ahn · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 101 · 06351410.1063/1.2710346 ↗
43. Ganeyev · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 45310.1016/0001-6160(88)90020-X ↗
44. Willis · Proc R Soc Lond A · 1972 · 329 · 12110.1098/rspa.1972.0104 ↗
45. Mishin · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 501310.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.034 ↗
46. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
47. Ziegenhain · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 15545610.1103/PhysRevB.81.155456 ↗
48. Marian · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 238910.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.050 ↗
49. Erhart · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 72 · 5210410.1103/PhysRevB.72.052104 ↗
50. Davila · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 86 · 16190210.1063/1.1906307 ↗
51. Luo · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 107 · 5610210.1063/1.3326941 ↗
52. Li · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 67 · 12510110.1103/PhysRevB.67.125101 ↗
53. Burton · Phys Rev B · 1972 · 5 · 294810.1103/PhysRevB.5.2948 ↗
54. Zhang · Cent Eur J Phys · 2006 · 4 · 48110.2478/s11534-006-0028-8 ↗
55. Mott · Philos Mag · 1952 · 43 · 115110.1080/14786441108521024 ↗