journal article·2003-05

The electrical potential difference across cracks in PZT measured by Kelvin Probe Microscopy and the implications for fracture

G.A. Schneider, F. Felten, R.M. McMeeking

Acta Materialia· Volume 51· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

An indentation crack in a poled PZT ceramic subjected to an electric field is investigated using AFM and KFM to determine the crack opening displacement and the electrical potential difference across the crack. The experimental results are used to calculate the crack tip stress and dielectric displacement intensity factors and the crack tip energy release rate. From the applied electric field and the measured field interior to the crack, the dielectric constant of the crack interior is determined to be 40. The consequences of this permittivity on the crack tip energy release rate are illustrated for a Griffith crack. The theoretically predicted effect of an applied electric field in retarding crack growth decreases significantly with increasing permittivity. In practical situations in terms of crack length, applied load and electric field level, the retardation of crack growth is negligible when the dielectric constant of the crack interior is higher than 20.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Setter · 1993
2. Haertling · Am J Cer Soc · 1999 · 82 · 79710.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01840.x ↗
3. Hao · Eng Frac Mech · 1994 · 47 · 79310.1016/0013-7944(94)90059-0 ↗
4. Suo · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 4 · 73910.1016/0022-5096(92)90002-J ↗
5. Suo · J Mech Phys Solids · 1993 · 41 · 115510.1016/0022-5096(93)90088-W ↗
6. Pak · J Appl Mech · 1990 · 57 · 64710.1115/1.2897071 ↗
7. Schneider · J Europ Cer Soc · 1999 · 19 · 129910.1016/S0955-2219(98)00424-5 ↗
8. Heyer V. PhD Thesis, Fortschr.-Ber. VDI, Reihe 2000;18(254).
9. Park · J Am Cer Soc · 1995 · 78 · 147510.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08840.x ↗
10. McMeeking · Int J Frac · 2001 · 108 · 2510.1023/A:1007652001977 ↗
11. Kelvin · Philos Mag · 1898 · 46 · 80
12. Weaver · J Vac Sci Technol · 1991 · B9 · 155910.1116/1.585423 ↗
13. Jacobs · Rev Sci Instrum · 1999 · 30 · 175610.1063/1.1149664 ↗
14. Raddatz · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 638110.1016/S1359-6454(98)00317-6 ↗
15. Meschke · J Am Cer Soc · 2000 · 83 · 35310.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01197.x ↗
16. Jacobs · J App Phys · 1998 · 84 · 116810.1063/1.368181 ↗
17. Seidel · J Am Cerm Soc · 1997 · 80 · 43310.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02848.x ↗
18. Jaffe · 1971
19. 2000
20. Kemmer G. PhD Thesis, Fortschr.-Ber. VDI, Reihe 2000;18(261).
21. Zhang · Int J Solids Structures · 1998 · 35 · 212110.1016/S0020-7683(97)00168-6 ↗
22. Smith · J Math Phys · 1966 · XLV · 4510.1002/sapm196645145 ↗
23. McMeeking · J Appl Math Phys (ZAMP) · 1989 · 40 · 61510.1007/BF00945867 ↗
24. Griffith · Phil Trans Roy Soc · 1921 · A221 · 16310.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗