journal article·2014-08

Phase-field modeling of martensitic microstructure in NiTi shape memory alloys

Yuan Zhong, Ting Zhu

Acta Materialia· Volume 75
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A phase-field model is developed to study the cubic to monoclinic martensitic phase transformation in nickel–titanium (NiTi) shape memory alloys. Three-dimensional phase-field simulations show the nucleation and growth of monoclinic B19′ multivariants that form a polytwinned martensitic microstructure. Parametric studies demonstrate that mechanical constraints and crystallographic orientation govern the patterning of martensitic twin variants in the formation of strain-accommodating microstructures. Pairing of twin variants is studied by comparing the phase-field simulation results with the crystallographic solutions of compatible twins. The phase-field method developed in this work is generally applicable to simulate the dynamic microstructure evolution of metals and alloys that produce low-symmetry phases through martensitic transformation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
2. Otsuka · MRS Bull · 2002 · 27 · 9110.1557/mrs2002.43 ↗
3. 1998
4. Zhu · Prog Mater Sci · 2010 · 55 · 71010.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.001 ↗
5. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
6. Microstructure of martensite
7. Hane · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 260310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00143-3 ↗
8. Knowles · Acta Metall · 1981 · 29 · 10110.1016/0001-6160(81)90091-2 ↗
9. Hatcher · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 02020210.1103/PhysRevB.79.020202 ↗
10. Hatcher · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 14420310.1103/PhysRevB.80.144203 ↗
11. Huang · Nat Mater · 2003 · 2 · 30710.1038/nmat884 ↗
12. Wagner · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 623210.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.043 ↗
13. Waitz · Europhys Lett · 2005 · 71 · 9810.1209/epl/i2005-10061-y ↗
14. Mutter · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 22420110.1103/PhysRevB.82.224201 ↗
15. Mutter · Eur Phys J B · 2011 · 84 · 10910.1140/epjb/e2011-20661-4 ↗
16. Zhong · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 110 · 03353210.1063/1.3621429 ↗
17. Zhong · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 630110.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.004 ↗
18. Zhong · Scr Mater · 2012 · 67 · 88310.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.08.014 ↗
19. Artemev · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 116510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00021-0 ↗
20. Chen · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 32 · 11310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
21. Chen · Comput Phys Commun · 1998 · 108 · 14710.1016/S0010-4655(97)00115-X ↗
22. Wang · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 75910.1016/S1359-6454(96)00180-2 ↗
23. Wang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 121210.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.041 ↗
24. Li · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 264810.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.001 ↗
25. Shu · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 396910.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.018 ↗
26. Yang · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 96:081916
27. Heo · Philos Mag Lett · 2011 · 91 · 11010.1080/09500839.2010.537284 ↗
28. Anand · J Mech Phys Solids · 2003 · 51 · 101510.1016/S0022-5096(03)00017-6 ↗
29. Balluffi · 2005