Analysis of the anisotropy of point defect diffusion in hcp Zr
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A combination of density functional theory (DFT), kinetic Monte Carlo and mean-field rate theory is applied to analyze point defect migration and its effect on the observed growth of hexagonal close-packed (hcp) Zr under 1 MeV electron irradiation. DFT is used to study stability of various configurations of vacancies and self-interstitial atoms (SIAs) and migration barriers. The data are used in kinetic Monte Carlo modeling of defect diffusion at different temperatures. It is found that both defects exhibit anisotropic diffusion, predominantly parallel to the basal planes. The ratio of diffusion coefficients parallel and perpendicular to the basal planes is found to be higher for vacancies as compared to SIAs at temperatures below ∼600 K. This raises doubts that the observed radiation growth in Zr irradiated with 1 MeV electrons, namely positive strains in prismatic and negative strains in basal directions, and void alignment along basal planes, can be accounted for by the anisotropy of point defect diffusion, which predicts opposite strain signs. It is speculated that formation of small SIA clusters with higher diffusion anisotropy may be responsible for the experimental observations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Golubov SI, Barashev AV, Stoller RE. ORNL Report ORNL/TM-2011/473. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2011.
2. Golubov SI, Barashev AV, Stoller RE, Singh BN. Breakthrough in understanding radiation growth of zirconium. In: Comstock RJ, editor. Zirconium in the nuclear industry, 17th international symposium, ASTM STP 1543. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; in press.
3. Wooding · J Nucl Mater · 1998 · 254 · 19110.1016/S0022-3115(97)00365-6 ↗
4. Voskoboinikov · J ASTM Int · 2005 · 2
5. Voskoboinikov · Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B · 2006 · 242 · 6810.1016/j.nimb.2005.08.166 ↗
6. de Diego · Metall Mater Trans · 2002 · 33A · 78310.1007/s11661-002-0145-y ↗
7. Woo · J Nucl Mater · 1983 · 119 · 21910.1016/0022-3115(83)90198-8 ↗
8. Woo · J Nucl Mater · 1988 · 159 · 23710.1016/0022-3115(88)90096-7 ↗
9. Osetsky · Metall Mater Trans · 2002 · 33A · 77710.1007/s11661-002-0144-z ↗
10. Hood · Defects Diffus Data · 1993 · 95–98 · 75510.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.95-98.755 ↗
11. Hood · Def Diff Forum · 1997 · 143–147 · 4910.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.143-147.49 ↗
12. de Carlan · ASTM STP · 1996 · 1295 · 638
13. Foreman AJE. Report No. AERE-R-7135. UKAE Authority, Harwell, 1972.
14. Barashev · Phil Mag · 2010 · 90 · 178710.1080/14786430903482735 ↗
15. Willaime · J Nucl Mater · 2003 · 323 · 20510.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.005 ↗
16. Domain · Phil Mag · 2005 · 85 · 56910.1080/14786430412331334625 ↗
17. Verite · Solid State Phenom · 2007 · 129 · 7510.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.129.75 ↗
18. Samolyuk GD, Golubov SI, Osetsky YN, Stoller RE. ORNL/TM-2011/516. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2012.
19. Peng · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 429 · 23310.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.06.010 ↗
20. Samolyuk · Philos Mag Lett · 2013 · 93 · 9310.1080/09500839.2012.745653 ↗
21. Peng · J Nucl Mater · 2013 · 437 · 29310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.02.013 ↗
22. Vérité · Phys Rev B · 2013 · 87 · 13410810.1103/PhysRevB.87.134108 ↗
23. Varvenne · Phys Rev B · 2013 · 88 · 13410210.1103/PhysRevB.88.134102 ↗
24. Giannozzi · J Phys: Condens Matter · 2009 · 21 · 395502
25. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
26. Vanderbilt · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 41 · 789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
27. We used the pseudopotential Zr.pbe-nsp-van.UPF from: .
28. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
29. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
30. Jonsson · 1998 · 385
31. Henkelman · J Chem Phys · 2000 · 113 · 990110.1063/1.1329672 ↗
32. Henkelman · J Chem Phys · 2000 · 113 · 997810.1063/1.1323224 ↗
33. Domain · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 351310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00173-8 ↗
34. Fast · Phys Rev B · 1995 · 51 · 1743110.1103/PhysRevB.51.17431 ↗
35. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1981 · 1981 · 504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
36. Young · Proc Phys Soc · 1966 · 89 · 73510.1088/0370-1328/89/3/329 ↗
37. Fisher · Phys Rev A · 1964 · 135 · 48210.1103/PhysRev.135.A482 ↗
38. Griffiths · J Nucl Mater · 1995 · 225 · 24510.1016/0022-3115(94)00687-3 ↗