Cu–Hf–Ti–Ag–Ta bulk metallic glass composites and their properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Multi-component (Cu0.50Hf0.35Ti0.10Ag0.05)100 − xTax (x = 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12) bulk metallic glass (BMG) composites containing in situ formed dendrites were prepared successfully. With increasing Ta content, both compressive fracture strength (σf) and elastic-plastic strain (ef) increase from 2180 MPa and 2.1% for x = 0, to 2770 MPa and 19.2% for x = 8, respectively, but yield strength and elastic modulus decrease. The precipitation of a high volume fraction of the dendrites (Vdendrite) causes the compositional variation of the dendrites and its counterpart glass matrix. Composition analysis shows that both Hf and Ti elements exhibit an opposite behavior of dissolving into the dendrites during the cooling. About 7–11 at.% component elements (Ti, Cu and Ag) were detected in Ta-rich dendrites, but no Hf element was found. With increasing Vdendrite, the content of component elements dissolving into Ta-rich dendrites decreases from 11.35 at.% for Vdendrite = 4.3% and 7.97 at.% for Vdendrite = 26.5%. Indentation testing was also performed to evaluate the properties of the composites. With increasing Vdendrite, the hardness of the dendrites decreases from 6.0 GPa for x = 3 to 5.21 GPa for x = 12, and its elastic modulus increases from 151.2 GPa for x = 3 to 156.9 GPa for x = 12. The hardness and elastic modulus of the glassy matrix also decrease, respectively, from 9.66 and 148.7 GPa for x = 0 to 9.36 and 137.4 GPa for x = 12 with increasing precipitation of the dendrites. The variation of the properties is due to the compositional change originating from the opposite behavior of Hf and Ti elements to dissolve into the dendrites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Inoue · Nat Mater · 2003 · 2 · 66110.1038/nmat982 ↗
2. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 163110.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.008 ↗
3. Hays · Phys Rev Lett · 2000 · 84 · 290110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2901 ↗
4. Conner · J Mater Res · 1999 · 14 · 329210.1557/JMR.1999.0445 ↗
5. Dandliker · J Mater Res · 1998 · 13 · 289610.1557/JMR.1998.0396 ↗
6. Yim · Appl Phys Lett · 1997 · 71 · 380810.1063/1.120512 ↗
7. Kim · Appl Phys Lett · 2001 · 79 · 145610.1063/1.1390317 ↗
8. Eckert · Mater Trans JIM · 2003 · 44 · 199910.2320/matertrans.44.1999 ↗
9. Das · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 82 · 469010.1063/1.1587254 ↗
10. He · Nat Mater · 2003 · 2 · 3310.1038/nmat792 ↗
11. Bian · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 81 · 473910.1063/1.1530371 ↗
12. Bian · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 82 · 279010.1063/1.1570938 ↗
13. Bian · Adv Mater · 2003 · 15 · 61610.1002/adma.200304565 ↗
14. Inoue · 1998
15. Johnson · MRS Bull · 1999 · 24 · 4210.1557/S0883769400053252 ↗
16. Kim · Mater Trans JIM · 2003 · 44 · 222410.2320/matertrans.44.2224 ↗
17. Lee · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 278110.1063/1.1697631 ↗
18. Bian · Mater Trans JIM · 2004 · 45 · 234610.2320/matertrans.45.2346 ↗
19. Oliver · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
20. Oliver · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
21. Schuh · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 4610.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.46 ↗
22. Schuh · J Mater Res · 2002 · 17 · 165110.1557/JMR.2002.0243 ↗
23. Gloriant · Nanostruct Mater · 1998 · 10 · 38910.1016/S0965-9773(98)00079-8 ↗
24. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 264510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00181-1 ↗
25. Inoue · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 235110.1063/1.1613813 ↗
26. Inoue · Mater Trans JIM · 2004 · 45 · 58410.2320/matertrans.45.584 ↗
27. Metals databook, edited by Japan Institute of Metals (Maruzen, Tokyo, 1983), p. 8
28. Boer · 1988
29. Takeuchi · Mater Trans JIM · 2000 · 41 · 137210.2320/matertrans1989.41.1372 ↗
30. Massalski · 1990