journal article·2012-10

Reversal of the negative natural aging effect in Al–Mg–Si alloys

F.A. Martinsen, F.J.H. Ehlers, M. Torsæter, R. Holmestad

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The effect of solute clustering on subsequent precipitation has been investigated for three different Al–Mg–Si alloys with similar Mg/Si ratios but different Mg + Si contents. Hardness measurements were carried out (i) during various natural aging (NA) times at room temperature, and (ii) after a fixed artificial aging (AA) heat treatment preceded by various NA times. Comparison between the two hardness plots stressed an intimate connection between solute clusters and precipitates: for the NA times investigated (between a few seconds and several months), transient phenomena with short (less than 10 h) lifetimes were observed, both occurring at earlier times and with higher relative importance for increasing solute concentration. Upon NA + AA, these transient phenomena were found to be responsible for the well-known “negative NA effect”, as evidenced by a close correlation between the respective lifetimes. In particular, the negative NA effect itself was found to be transient, and was reversed upon long storage times by the dominance of a process beneficial to precipitation. Transmission electron microscopy studies of selected alloy conditions ensured that the recorded hardness variations reflected variations in the alloy microstructure. Attempts were made to couple the transient clustering phenomena with solute strain field interactions. Preliminary calculations following this line of thought suggested a competitive nature of both Mg–Mg and Mg–Si interactions, in contrast with the usual view of Mg–Mg repulsion. An alloy hardness optimization procedure as a function of storage time, temperature and alloy composition has been suggested.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Jacobs · Philos Mag · 1972 · 26 · 110.1080/14786437208221015 ↗
2. Edwards · Mater Sci Forum · 1996 · 217–222 · 71310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.217-222.713 ↗
3. Ravi · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 421310.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.037 ↗
4. Holmestad R, Marioara CD, Ehlers FJH, Torsæter M, Bjørge R, Røyset J, et al. Precipitation in 6xxx aluminum alloys. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on aluminium alloys, Yokohama, Japan, vol.1; September 5–9, 2010. p. 30.
5. Aaronson · 2010
6. Marquis · Mater Sci Eng R · 2010 · 69 · 3710.1016/j.mser.2010.05.001 ↗
7. Murayama · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 153710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00033-6 ↗
8. Banhart · Adv Eng Mater · 2010 · 12 · 55910.1002/adem.201000041 ↗
9. De Geuser · Philos Mag Lett · 2006 · 86 · 22710.1080/09500830600643270 ↗
10. Banhart J, Chang CST, Liang Z, Wanderka N, Lay MDH, Hill AJ. The kinetics of natural ageing in 6000 alloys – a multi-method approach. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on aluminium alloys, vol. 1, Yokohama, Japan; September 5–9, 2010. p. 381.
11. Murali · JOM · 1997 · 49 · 2910.1007/BF02915475 ↗
12. Abid · J Alloys Compd · 2010 · 490 · 16610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.096 ↗
13. Torsæter · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 108 · 07352710.1063/1.3481090 ↗
14. Banhart · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 01410110.1103/PhysRevB.83.014101 ↗
15. Murayama · Mater Sci Eng A · 1998 · 250 · 12710.1016/S0921-5093(98)00548-6 ↗
16. Torsæter M. Quantitative studies of clustering and precipitation in Al–Mg–Si(–Cu) alloys. PhD thesis, NTNU; 2011. ISBN: 978-82-471-2980-7:113.
17. Serizawa · Metall Mater Trans · 2008 · 93 · 234
18. Røyset · Mater Sci Forum · 2006 · 519 · 23910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.239 ↗
19. Marioara · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 78910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00470-6 ↗
20. Chang · Ultramicroscopy · 2009 · 109 · 58510.1016/j.ultramic.2008.12.002 ↗
21. Kovacs · Acta Metall · 1972 · 30 · 97510.1016/0001-6160(72)90092-2 ↗
22. Dutta · J Mater Sci Lett · 1991 · 10 · 32310.1007/BF00719697 ↗
23. Edwards · Appl Surf Sci · 1994 · 76/77 · 21910.1016/0169-4332(94)90346-8 ↗
24. Hirosawa · Mater Sci Forum · 2007 · 561–565 · 28310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.283 ↗
25. Li · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 341510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00160-5 ↗
26. Marioara · Metall Mater Trans A · 2005 · 36 · 691
27. Andersen · Metall Mater Trans A · 1995 · 26 · 193110.1007/BF02670664 ↗
28. Hasting · J Appl Phys · 2009 · 106 · 12352710.1063/1.3269714 ↗
29. Chang · Metall Mater Trans A · 2011 · 42A · 196010.1007/s11661-010-0596-5 ↗
30. Wolverton · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 586710.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.039 ↗
31. Hohenberg · Phys Rev · 1964 · 136 · B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
32. Kohn · Phys Rev · 1965 · 140 · A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
33. Vanderbilt · Phys Rev B · 1985 · 32 · 841210.1103/PhysRevB.32.8412 ↗
34. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 47 · R55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
35. Kresse · Comput Mater Sci · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
36. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗