In situ observations of crack arrest and bridging by nanoscale twins in copper thin films
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In situ tensile experiments in a transmission electron microscope revealed that micro-cracks in ultrafine grained, free-standing, thin copper foils containing nanoscale twins initiated in matrix domains separated by the twins and then arrested at twin boundaries as twin boundary sliding proceeded. The adjacent microcracks eventually coalesced through shear failure of the bridging twins. To investigate the atomic mechanism of this rarely seen nanoscale crack bridging behavior, molecular dynamics simulations were performed to show that during crack propagation twin boundaries are impinged upon by numerous dislocations from the plastically deforming matrix. These dislocations react at the interface and evolve into substantially impenetrable dislocation walls that strongly confine crack nucleation and resist crack propagation, leading to the experimentally observed crack bridging behavior. The present results raise an approach to significantly toughening polycrystalline thin films by incorporating nanoscale twin structures into individual grains that serve as crack bridging ligaments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
2. Ma · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 493210.1063/1.1814431 ↗
3. Frøseth · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 586310.1063/1.1835531 ↗
4. Zhu · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2007 · 104 · 303110.1073/pnas.0611097104 ↗
5. Lu · Science · 2009 · 323 · 60710.1126/science.1167641 ↗
6. Anderoglu · J Appl Phys · 2009 · 106 · 02431310.1063/1.3176483 ↗
7. Li · Nature · 2010 · 464 · 87710.1038/nature08929 ↗
8. Qu · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 33570410.1088/0957-4484/21/33/335704 ↗
9. Stukowski · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 22410310.1103/PhysRevB.82.224103 ↗
10. Qin · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 53910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.012 ↗
11. Qin · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 621510.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.048 ↗
12. Singh · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 243710.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.043 ↗
13. Zhou · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · 18 · 06500310.1088/0965-0393/18/6/065003 ↗
14. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
15. Anderoglu · Int J Plasticity · 2010 · 26 · 87510.1016/j.ijplas.2009.11.003 ↗
16. Li · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 598910.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.007 ↗
17. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
18. Nose · J Chem Phys · 1984 · 81 · 51110.1063/1.447334 ↗
19. Tuckerman · J Chem Phys · 1992 · 97 · 199010.1063/1.463137 ↗
20. Li · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2009 · 106 · 1610810.1073/pnas.0901765106 ↗
21. Van Swygenhoven · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 62 · 83110.1103/PhysRevB.62.831 ↗
22. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 04190610.1063/1.2965637 ↗
23. Dao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 542110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.062 ↗
24. Budiansky · J Mech Phys Solids · 1998 · 36 · 16710.1016/S0022-5096(98)90003-5 ↗
25. Nalla · Nature Mater · 2003 · 2 · 16410.1038/nmat832 ↗
26. Cox · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 34110.1016/0956-7151(94)90492-8 ↗
27. Bannister · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 153110.1016/0956-7151(92)90096-W ↗
28. Shan · JOM · 2008 · 60 · 7110.1007/s11837-008-0122-z ↗
29. Keller · Mater Sci Eng A · 1996 · 214 · 4210.1016/0921-5093(96)10253-7 ↗
30. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 574310.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032 ↗
31. Ovid’ko · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 120110.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.004 ↗