Phase separation and formation of omega phase in the beta matrix of a Ti–V–Cu alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The formation of the ω phase in the presence of simultaneous development of compositional modulations (or phase separation) within the body-centered cubic β matrix phase of a Ti–10V–6Cu (wt.%) alloy during continuous cooling has been investigated using a combination of transmission electron microscopy and atom probe tomography. While a water quench from the high-temperature β phase field allows apparently athermal formation of ω domains without any significant partitioning of solute or modulation in matrix composition, subsequent annealing at 500 °C for just 60 s leads to unusually rapid growth of the ω domains concurrent with, but apparently independent of, a slower development of finer-scale modulations in solute composition occurring apparently uniformly across both ω and β phases. In contrast, on slower air cooling from the solution treatment temperature, there are pronounced compositional fluctuations within the β phase, presumably as a product of spinodal decomposition, that are detectable prior to the formation of ω phase. The ω phase subsequently forms preferentially in solute-depleted regions of the matrix β, with a composition reflecting the local matrix composition and a solute content significantly lower than the average matrix composition. As a result, it has a cuboidal morphology, distinguishably different from the elliposoidal form that is observed in samples water-quenched and annealed at 500 °C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Banerjee · 2004
2. Frost · Trans Am Soc Met · 1954 · 46 · 231
3. Boyer · 1994
4. De Fontaine · Acta Metall · 1971 · 19 · 115310.1016/0001-6160(71)90047-2 ↗
5. Williams · Met Trans · 1973 · 4 · 270110.1007/BF02644570 ↗
6. Hickman · J Mater Sci · 1969 · 4 · 55410.1007/BF00550217 ↗
7. Silcock · Acta Metall Mater · 1958 · 6 · 48110.1016/0001-6160(58)90111-1 ↗
8. Duerig TW, Terlinde GT, Williams JC. Titanium ’80: science and technology 1980;1299.
9. Hickman · Trans TMS – AIME · 1969 · 245 · 1329
10. Pennock GM, Flower HM, West DRF. Titanium ’80: science and technology 1980:1343.
11. Langmayr · Phys Rev · 1994 · 49B · 1175910.1103/PhysRevB.49.11759 ↗
12. Moffat · Met Trans A · 1988 · 19A · 168710.1007/BF02645136 ↗
13. Menon · J Mater Sci · 1983 · 18 · 37510.1007/BF00560625 ↗
14. Williams · Trans TMS – AIME · 1969 · 245 · 2352
15. Duerig · Metall Trans · 1980 · 11A · 198710.1007/BF02655118 ↗
16. Devaraj · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 70110.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.006 ↗
17. Miller · Microsc Microanal · 2007 · 13 · 42810.1017/S1431927607070845 ↗
18. Hellman · Microsc Microanal · 2000 · 6 · 43710.1007/S100050010051 ↗
19. Sass · J. Less-Common Met · 1972 · 28 · 15710.1016/0022-5088(72)90177-4 ↗
20. McCabe · Philos Mag · 1971 · 23 · 95710.1080/14786437108216998 ↗
21. Turchanin · Powder Met Metal Ceram · 2006 · 45 · 27210.1007/s11106-006-0075-0 ↗
22. Collings EW. In: Timmerhaus KD, Clark AF, editors. Applied superconductivity, metallurgy and physics of titanium alloys; Volume 1: Fundamentals. New York: Springer; 1986. p. 57.10.1007/978-1-4613-2095-1 ↗
23. Banerjee · Int J Mater Res · 2006 · 97 · 96310.3139/146.101327 ↗
24. Vassel · 1993 · 173
25. Williams · Metall Trans · 1971 · 2 · 47710.1007/BF02663337 ↗
26. Mehrer H. In: Landolt-Börnstein, editor. Diffusion in solid metals and alloys, vol. 26. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990. p. 102.10.1007/b37801 ↗
27. Neumann G, Tuijn C. Self-diffusion and impurity diffusion in pure metals, vol. 14. London: Pergamon Press; 2009. p. 154.10.1016/S1470-1804(08)00007-2 ↗