journal article·2006-02

Stress-life fatigue behavior of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass

B.C. Menzel, R.H. Dauskardt

Acta Materialia· Volume 54· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fatigue damage was characterized for a Zr-based bulk metallic glass to elucidate damage initiation and growth mechanisms. Damage was observed to initiate as shear bands or mixed-mode cracks propagating at ∼49° to the maximum applied stress axis after only a few stress cycles. The apparent lack of a damage initiation stage may account for the low endurance limit reported. The damage was often observed to initiate from pre-existing defects. At a characteristic length, the initial shear bands or mixed-mode cracks abruptly changed growth direction and propagated orthogonal to the maximum stress axis. The resulting “small” fatigue crack-growth rates were carefully characterized and shown to be consistent with “long” crack-growth rate behavior. Fatigue life was estimated from the observed initial defect sizes and small crack-growth rate behavior and life predictions were found to be consistent with measured stress life data.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Wood Treatment and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Gilbert · Metall Mater Trans A · 1999 · 30 · 173910.1007/s11661-999-0173-y ↗
2. Flores · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 118110.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.08.020 ↗
3. Peter · Intermetallics · 2002 · 10 · 112510.1016/S0966-9795(02)00152-8 ↗
4. Brown WF, Aerospace structural metals handbook, vol. 1224; 1989. p. 1.
5. Suresh · 1998
6. Shigley · 1989
7. Hertzberg · 1996
8. Johnson · 1995 · 25
9. Peker · Appl Phys Lett · 1993 · 63 · 234210.1063/1.110520 ↗
10. Bruck · Scripta Metall Mater · 1994 · 30 · 42910.1016/0956-716X(94)90598-3 ↗
11. Conner · Scripta Metall Mater · 1997 · 37 · 137310.1016/S1359-6462(97)00250-9 ↗
12. Gilbert · Appl Phys Lett · 1997 · 71 · 47610.1063/1.119610 ↗
13. Suh · J Mater Res · 2002 · 17 · 125410.1557/JMR.2002.0188 ↗
14. Flores · J Mater Res · 1999 · 14 · 63810.1557/JMR.1999.0642 ↗
15. Flores · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 41 · 93710.1016/S1359-6462(99)00243-2 ↗
16. He · Eng Fracture Mech · 2000 · 65 · 110.1016/S0013-7944(99)00129-0 ↗
17. Newman JC, Raju IS, NASA Technical Memorandum, 85793, 1984. p. 1.
18. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 116710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-9 ↗
19. Lowhaphandu · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 41 · 1910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00128-1 ↗
20. Lewandowski · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 342710.1080/01418610208240453 ↗
21. Liu · Metall Mater Trans A · 1998 · 29 · 181110.1007/s11661-998-0004-6 ↗
22. Wright · Mater Trans · 2001 · 42 · 64210.2320/matertrans.42.642 ↗
23. Gerdes · 1984
24. Cameron KK, Dauskardt RH. Scripta Mater 2005, in press.
25. He · Trans ASME J Appl Mech · 1989 · 56 · 27010.1115/1.3176078 ↗
26. Hutchinson · Adv Appl Mech · 1991 · 29 · 6310.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
27. Suresh · Int Metals Rev · 1984 · 29 · 445
28. Usami · Fatigue Eng Mater Struct · 1979 · 1 · 47110.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb01334.x ↗
29. Kitagawa H, Takahashi S. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on mechanical behavior of materials; 1976. p. 627.
30. Tanaka · Int J Fracture · 1981 · 17 · 51910.1007/BF00033345 ↗