journal article·2006-02

Effect of processing route on microstructure and texture development in equal channel angular extrusion of interstitial-free steel

Saiyi Li, Azdiar A. Gazder, Irene J. Beyerlein, Elena V. Pereloma, Christopher H.J. Davies

Acta Materialia· Volume 54· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Microstructure and texture evolution in equal channel angular extrusion (ECAE) of interstitial-free (IF) steel is investigated for up to 4 passes via routes A, BA ,B C and C. Observations by transmission electron microscopy reveal that the efficacy of grain refinement depends on both processing route and pass number. The preferred route is found to be route C after 2 passes but route BC after 4 passes. Quantitative analysis of the experimental textures shows the development of {1 1 0}AE uvw aeh and { hkl }AE 111 aeh partial fiber textures in all routes, but the orientation distribution along these fibers is more uniform in routes A and C than BA and BC. The experimental textures are well predicted using a visco-plastic self-consistent model based on the simple shear assumption of ECAE deformation. Finite element (FE) analysis and further texture simulations using the FE-predicted deformation history suggest that imperfect strain reversal is a main factor for the prevalence of shear-type textures and elongated lamellar substructure observed after the even-numbered passes of route C. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Segal · Mater Sci Eng A · 1995 · 197 · 15710.1016/0921-5093(95)09705-8 ↗
2. Furukawa · Mater Sci Eng A · 1998 · 257 · 32810.1016/S0921-5093(98)00750-3 ↗
3. Hughes · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 387110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00027-X ↗
4. Gazder · 2004 · 321
5. Fukuda · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 135910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00441-4 ↗
6. Aoki · 2001 · 266
7. Park · Mater Sci Eng A · 2000 · 293 · 16510.1016/S0921-5093(00)01220-X ↗
8. Shin · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 128510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00010-6 ↗
9. Han · Metall Mater Trans A · 2004 · 35 · 134310.1007/s11661-004-0309-z ↗
10. Sus-Ryszkowska · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 369 · 15110.1016/j.msea.2003.10.318 ↗
11. Gazder · Mater Sci Forum · 2003 · 426–432 · 269310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.2693 ↗
12. Kim · Adv Eng Mater · 2005 · 7 · 4310.1002/adem.200400146 ↗
13. Gibbs · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 39 · 169910.1016/S1359-6462(98)00384-4 ↗
14. Agnew · 1999 · 575
15. Baik · Mater Sci Forum · 2002 · 408–412 · 69710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.408-412.697 ↗
16. Li · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2005 · 13 · 50910.1088/0965-0393/13/4/003 ↗
17. Li · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 485910.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.042 ↗
18. Bunge · 1982
19. Van Houtte · 2000
20. Li · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 394 · 6610.1016/j.msea.2004.11.032 ↗
21. Li · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 211110.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.023 ↗
22. Tomé · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33 · 263510.1007/s11661-002-0385-x ↗
23. Taylor · J Inst Metals · 1938 · 62 · 307
24. Beyerlein · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 345 · 12210.1016/S0921-5093(02)00457-4 ↗
25. Iwahashi · Scripta Mater · 1996 · 35 · 14310.1016/1359-6462(96)00107-8 ↗
26. Beyerlein · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 135910.1080/09500830500040940 ↗
27. ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual (Version 6.3), Pawtucket (RI): Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen; 2002.