journal article·2009-09

Deformation characteristics and stress–strain response of nanotwinned copper via molecular dynamics simulation

Ishraq Shabib, Ronald E. Miller

Acta Materialia· Volume 57· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

In this research parallel molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been performed to study the deformation behavior of nanocrystalline copper samples with embedded nanotwins under approximately uniaxial tensile load. Simulation results reveal that twin boundaries (TBs) act as obstacles to dislocation movements that lead to the strengthening of nanotwinned structures. However, easy glide of dislocations parallel to the TBs contribute primarily to the plastic strain or ductility of these materials. At higher deformation stages, the strengthening effects reach a maximum when abundant dislocations begin crossing the TBs. Due to this highly anisotropic plastic response of the grains, a random polycrystalline sample will show combined properties of ductility and strength. The strengths of the nanotwinned models are found to exhibit an inverse relationship with the twin width and temperature. We also investigate the relation between the deformation behavior in different grains, their orientation with respect to the loading direction, and ultimately the observed response of nanotwinned structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Shan · Science · 2004 · 305 · 65410.1126/science.1098741 ↗
2. Liao · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 63210.1063/1.1594836 ↗
3. Schiotz · Mater Res Soc Sympos Proc · 1999 · 538 · 29910.1557/PROC-538-299 ↗
4. Schiotz · Nature · 1998 · 391 · 56110.1038/35328 ↗
5. Wolf · Zeitschrift fur Metall · 2003 · 94 · 109110.3139/146.031091 ↗
6. Van Swygenhoven · Science · 2002 · 296 · 6610.1126/science.1071040 ↗
7. Van Swygenhoven · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 309 · 44010.1016/S0921-5093(00)01794-9 ↗
8. Van Swygenhoven · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 197510.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.026 ↗
9. Van Swygenhoven · Mater Res Soc Sympos Proc · 2001 · 634 · B5.5.110.1557/PROC-634-B5.5.1 ↗
10. Lu · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 216910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.031 ↗
11. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
12. Asaro · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 336910.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047 ↗
13. Dao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 542110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.062 ↗
14. Konopka · J Mater Process Technol · 2000 · 99 · 25510.1016/S0924-0136(99)00434-3 ↗
15. Yamakov · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 413510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00232-5 ↗
16. Froseth · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 225910.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.017 ↗
17. Jin · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 116310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.072 ↗
18. Cao · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 102 · 083511-1
19. Zhu · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2007 · 104 · 303110.1073/pnas.0611097104 ↗
20. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
21. Li · Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · 11 · 17310.1088/0965-0393/11/2/305 ↗
22. Wolf · Phil Mag A · 1992 · 66 · 99110.1080/01418619208248003 ↗
23. Schmidt · Phil Mag A · 1998 · 77 · 116110.1080/01418619808214246 ↗
24. Takata · Mater Sci Forum · 2004 · 467–470 · 80710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.467-470.807 ↗
25. Chandra · J Mater Sci · 1999 · 34 · 65510.1023/A:1004531706998 ↗
26. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
27. Zimmerman · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 165507/110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.165507 ↗
28. Plimpton · J Comput Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
29. Van Swygenhoven · Nat Mater · 2004 · 3 · 39910.1038/nmat1136 ↗
30. Shen · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 98910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.033 ↗
31. Ma · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 493210.1063/1.1814431 ↗
32. Shabib I, Miller RE. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 2009; 17, in press.10.1088/0965-0393/17/5/055009 ↗