Investigation of thermoelectric magnetic convection and its effect on solidification structure during directional solidification under a low axial magnetic field
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Thermoelectric magnetic convection (TEMC) at the scale of both the sample (L = 3 mm) and the cell/dendrite (L = 100 μm) was numerically and experimentally examined during the directional solidification of Al–Cu alloy under an axial magnetic field ( B ⩽ 1 T ). Numerical results show that TEMC on the sample scale increases to a maximum when B is of the order of 0.1 T, and then decreases as B increases further. However, at the cellular/dendritic scale, TEMC continues to increase with increasing magnetic field intensity up to a field of 1 T. Experimental results show that application of the magnetic field caused changes in the macroscopic interface shape and the cellular/dendritic morphology (i.e. formation of a protruding interface, decrease in the cellular spacing, and a cellular–dendritic transition). Changes in the macroscopic interface shape and the cellular/dendritic morphology under the magnetic field are in good agreement with the computed velocities of TEMC at the scales of the macroscopic interface and cell/dendrite, respectively. This means that changes in the interface shape and the cellular morphology under a lower magnetic field should be attributed respectively to TEMC on the sample scale and the cell/dendrite scale. Further, by investigating the effect of TEMC on the cellular morphology, it has been proved experimentally that the convection will reduce the cellular spacing and cause a cellular–dendritic transition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Duopouy · J Crystal Growth · 1997 · 181 · 14510.1016/S0022-0248(97)00191-7 ↗
2. Duopouy · J Crystal Growth · 1998 · 183 · 1861
3. Bose · Int J Heat Mass Trans · 2008 · 51 · 546510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.02.051 ↗
4. Ganguly · Eur Phys J: Appl Phys · 2007 · 40 · 221
5. Chowdhury · Int J Heat Mass Trans · 2007 · 50 · 269210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.11.038 ↗
6. Chakraborty · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 02450410.1103/PhysRevLett.95.024504 ↗
7. Chowdhury · J Phys D · 2005 · 38 · 286910.1088/0022-3727/38/16/020 ↗
8. Lehmann · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 406710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00064-0 ↗
9. Carruthers · 1997 · vol. 3 · 1
10. Matheson · J Crystal Growth · 1987 · 85 · 55710.1016/0022-0248(87)90492-1 ↗
11. Robertson · J Crystal Growth · 1986 · 76 · 10010.1016/0022-0248(86)90015-1 ↗
12. Boettinger · Metall Meter Trans A · 1981 · 12A · 32110.1007/BF02655205 ↗
13. Tewari · Metall Mater Trans A · 1994 · 25A · 153510.1007/BF02665485 ↗
14. Alboussiere · Rendu de l’Acad Sci · 1991 · 313 · 749
15. Laskar O. Thesis, INPG, France, 1994.
16. Yesilyurt · J Crystal Growth · 1999 · 207 · 27810.1016/S0022-0248(99)00377-2 ↗
17. Khine · J Crystal Growth · 1998 · 183 · 15010.1016/S0022-0248(97)00394-1 ↗
18. Li · Acta Mater · 2007 · 11 · 533310.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.036 ↗
19. Li · Acta Mater · 2006 · 20 · 534910.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.051 ↗
20. Shercliff · J Fluid Mech · 1979 · 91 · 23510.1017/S0022112079000136 ↗
21. Moreau · 1990
22. Kishida · ISIJ Int · 1990 · 30 · 3410.2355/isijinternational.30.34 ↗
23. Dolda · J Crystal Growth · 2006 · 291 · 110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.02.055 ↗
24. Glickman · 1982 · 557
25. Lehmann · J. Crystal Growth · 1998 · 183 · 69010.1016/S0022-0248(97)00468-5 ↗
26. Dupouy · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 179110.1016/0956-7151(92)90122-U ↗
27. Cantor · J Crystal Growth · 1977 · 41 · 10910.1016/0022-0248(77)90104-X ↗
28. Billia · 1993 · vol. 1