Type of lattice strain alteration, the reducing agent of activation energy of titania loading on the silica matrix than that of pure titania
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanosized titania and silica-supported titania (SST) were prepared by the sol–gel method using titanium tetrachloride as a titania precursor. An opposite behavior was observed in the lattice strain of titania and SST before and after transition onset point (TOP). The effect of the changes of the lattice strain on the size of nanocrystallites, the TOP, and activation energy of phase transformation from anatase to rutile is investigated. It is shown that under identical synthesis conditions, the average size of nanocrystallites in SST was less than that of pure titania. Moreover, TOP of titania was lower in pure titania sample than that of SST due to the tensile strain of pure titania vs. the compressive strain of SST at low calcination temperature. However, the activation energy of pure titania due to the compressive strain and the exponential leap of the tensile strain of SST, after TOP, was higher than that of SST.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Sato T · J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2001 · 39 · 429
2. 10.1023/A:101338271198310.1023/A:1013382711983 ↗
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.556-557.62110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.556-557.621 ↗
4. 10.1021/ac062414210.1021/ac0624142 ↗
5. Tristantini D · Int. J. Eng. Technol. · 2011 · 11 · 80
6. Kaneko M · 2002
7. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.11.04110.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.11.041 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.07710.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.077 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0167-577X(97)00219-X10.1016/S0167-577X(97)00219-X ↗
10. 10.1021/cr050053510.1021/cr0500535 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.00110.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.07.05910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.07.059 ↗
13. 10.1039/b819623k10.1039/b819623k ↗
14. 10.1021/jp061817310.1021/jp0618173 ↗
15. Polunia IA · Compos. Interfaces. · 1998 · 6 · 5710.1163/156855499X00297 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00247-710.1016/S0927-0248(02)00247-7 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10971-006-8267-010.1007/s10971-006-8267-0 ↗
18. 10.1080/10426507.2012.66967610.1080/10426507.2012.669676 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.180752010.1063/1.1807520 ↗
20. Milani Moghaddam H, Nasirian Sh. Dependence of activation energy and lattice strain on TiO2nanoparticles. Nanosci. Methods. 2012;1:201–212.10.1080/17458080.2011.620023 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.05210.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.052 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.07.02010.1016/j.physb.2010.07.020 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.12.03110.1016/j.micromeso.2009.12.031 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp065933h10.1021/jp065933h ↗
25. 10.1016/S0167-577X(98)00152-910.1016/S0167-577X(98)00152-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2005.02.00910.1016/j.ceramint.2005.02.009 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0272-8842(03)00019-110.1016/S0272-8842(03)00019-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.10.00910.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.10.009 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.08.00410.1016/j.powtec.2009.08.004 ↗
30. Okada K · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2001 · 85 · 159110.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00882.x ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.07.06510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.07.065 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.184437310.1063/1.1844373 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.11610.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.116 ↗
34. 10.1016/0021-9517(91)90126-O10.1016/0021-9517(91)90126-O ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.02.02010.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.02.020 ↗
36. 10.1163/156855412X62622510.1163/156855412X626225 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.02210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.022 ↗
38. 10.1021/ac60125a00610.1021/ac60125a006 ↗