Critical evaluation of the indentation data analyses methods for the extraction of isotropic uniaxial mechanical properties using finite element models
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Two different definitions of indentation strain and two different definitions of contact radius are being used in the current literature, leading to inconsistent estimates of mechanical properties (especially plastic properties). In this paper, we critically evaluate the validity of the different definitions of both the indentation strain and the contact radius by applying the protocols on datasets generated from a finite element simulation of spherical indentation. The finite element models allow assignment of a wide range of elastic–plastic properties to the sample while circumventing many of the uncertainties faced in experimental investigations, and thereby offer unique opportunities for critical validation of the different data analysis procedures. In particular, we are able to establish important connections between the indentation stress–strain curves and the conventional uniaxial stress–strain curves.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Tabor · 1951
2. Fischer-Cripps · Vacuum · 2000 · 58 · 56910.1016/S0042-207X(00)00377-8 ↗
3. Fischer-Cripps · 2004
4. Basu · J Mater Res · 2006 · 21 · 262810.1557/jmr.2006.0324 ↗
5. Field · J Mater Res · 1993 · 8 · 29710.1557/JMR.1993.0297 ↗
6. Field · J Mater Res · 1995 · 10 · 10110.1557/JMR.1995.0101 ↗
7. Swain · Mater Sci Eng A: Struct Mater: Prop, Microstruct Process · 1998 · 253 · 16010.1016/S0921-5093(98)00725-4 ↗
8. Murugaiah · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 113910.1557/JMR.2004.0148 ↗
9. He · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 438810.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.045 ↗
10. Taljat · Int J Solids Struct · 1998 · 35 · 441110.1016/S0020-7683(97)00249-7 ↗
11. Beghini · Int J Solids Struct · 2006 · 43 · 244110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.068 ↗
12. Michler J, Stauss S, Schwaller P, Bucaille J-L, Felder E. Determining the stress–strain behavior at micro- and nanometer scales by coupling nanoindentation to numerical simulation. EMPA (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research), Publication; 2002 (SPECRAPRT). p. 6–7.
13. Stauss · 2003
14. Pelletier · Tribol Int · 2006 · 39 · 59310.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.019 ↗
15. Hertz · 1896
16. Johnson · 1985
17. Sneddon · Int J Eng Sci · 1965 · 3 · 4710.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
18. Herbert · 2001
19. Oliver · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
20. Fischer-Cripps · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 51910.1016/1359-6454(95)00204-9 ↗
21. Kalidindi · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 352310.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.036 ↗
22. Pathak · Carbon · 2009 · 47 · 196910.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.042 ↗
23. Pathak · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2008 · 28 · 221310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.009 ↗
24. Pathak · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 302010.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.008 ↗
25. Pathak · J Mater Res · 2009 · 24 · 114210.1557/jmr.2009.0137 ↗
26. ABAQUS, Simulia. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes; 2009.