journal article·2002-02

Triple junction drag and grain growth in 2D polycrystals

G. Gottstein, L.S. Shvindlerman

Acta Materialia· Volume 50· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The process of grain growth in 2D systems is analyzed with respect to the controlling kinetics: from solely boundary kinetics, when grain growth in a polycrystal is determined by the Von Neumann–Mullins relation, to exclusively triple junction kinetics, when grain growth is governed by the mobility of triple junctions. It is shown that in the “intermediate” case, when the driving force for grain boundary motion and the characteristic mobility are grain boundary curvature and grain boundary mobility, respectively, a limited mobility of triple junctions essentially influences grain boundary motion. The Von Neumann–Mullins relation does not hold anymore, and this is the more pronounced the smaller the triple junction mobility. In the case where grain growth is determined by the mobility of grain boundary triple junctions (triple junction kinetics) all grains are transformed into polygons in the course of grain growth. Grain growth would cease if all grains assumed the shape of regular polygons, not only hexagons like in the Von Neumann–Mullins case. The only exceptions are triangles: they collapse without transforming into a polygon. The respective relation for the rate of a change of grain area under triple junction kinetics is obtained and discussed with regard to microstructure evolution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Von Neumann J. In: Metal interfaces. American Society for Testing Materials, Cleveland, 1952:108.
2. Mullins · J Appl Phys · 1956 · 27 · 90010.1063/1.1722511 ↗
3. Lücke · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 53310.1016/0956-7151(92)90402-Z ↗
4. Anderson · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 78310.1016/0001-6160(84)90151-2 ↗
5. Fradkov · Scripta Metall · 1985 · 19 · 128510.1016/0036-9748(85)90052-3 ↗
6. Galina · Phys Met Metall · 1987 · 63 · 165
7. Shvindlerman · 1997 · 255
8. Czubayko · Acta mater · 1988 · 46 · 586310.1016/S1359-6454(98)00241-9 ↗
9. Gottstein G, Shvindlerman LS. Scripta Mater 1998;38:1541, 1998;39:1489.10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00074-8 ↗
10. Gottstein · Interface Science · 1998 · 6 · 710.1023/A:1008641617937 ↗
11. Gottstein · Acta mater · 2000 · 48 · 39710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00373-0 ↗
12. Fradkov · 1988
13. Gottstein · Acta mater · 1993 · 41 · 326710.1016/0956-7151(93)90056-X ↗
14. Fradkov · Scripta mater · 1985 · 19 · 129110.1016/0036-9748(85)90053-5 ↗