Atomistic simulation of the deformation of gold nanopillars
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We perform a series of molecular dynamics simulations of the uniaxial compression of cylindrical gold nanopillars. Yield occurs via Shockley partial dislocation nucleation at the surface. Dislocation nucleation is preceded, in some cases (depending on the interatomic potential), by an elastic instability of the nanopillars, either Euler buckling or shears folding. For some potentials, this buckling is related to compressive stress-driven face-centered cubic-hexagonal close-packed phase transitions in the bulk. In cases in which dislocation nucleation is not preceded by an elastic instability (this depends on the choice of the interatomic potential and loading direction), the yield stress is found to be either a parabolic (i.e. described by the relationship A - B T with A, B = const) or linear function of temperature, T. We suggest that Shockley partial dislocation nucleation at the surface of the nanopillar occurs at a critical strain, where the local strain has contributions from the homogeneous elastic strain and an atomic-level thermal strain (associated with the thermal vibrations). This model explains the observed temperature dependence of the yield stress of the compressed nanopillars.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Yu · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 299110.1063/1.1644634 ↗
2. Choi · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 94 · 605010.1063/1.1615702 ↗
3. Mook · Z Metallkd · 2004 · 95 · 41610.3139/146.017975 ↗
4. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
5. Greer · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 182110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031 ↗
6. Greer · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
7. Corcoran · Phys Rev B · 1997 · 55 · R1605710.1103/PhysRevB.55.R16057 ↗
8. Tadmor · J Mater Res · 1999 · 14 · 223310.1557/JMR.1999.0300 ↗
9. Van Swygenhoven · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 197510.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.026 ↗
10. Horstemeyer · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 436310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00149-5 ↗
11. Diao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 64310.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.008 ↗
12. Cha · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 398310.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.014 ↗
13. Frenkel · 2002
14. Cheung · J Appl Phys · 1991 · 70 · 568810.1063/1.350186 ↗
15. Steinhard · Phys Rev B · 1983 · 28 · 78410.1103/PhysRevB.28.784 ↗
16. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
17. Cai · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 839810.1103/PhysRevB.54.8398 ↗
18. Grochola · J Chem Phys · 2005 · 123 · 20471910.1063/1.2124667 ↗
19. Rice · J Mech Phys Sol · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
20. Rabkin E, Srolovitz DJ. Nanoletters, 2006, in press.
21. Diao · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 07541310.1103/PhysRevB.70.075413 ↗
22. Love · 1944
23. Dunand · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 106310.1016/1359-6454(95)00224-3 ↗
24. Diao · Nanoletters · 2004 · 4 · 186310.1021/nl0489992 ↗
25. Lindemann · Phys Z · 1910 · 11 · 609
26. Häkkinen · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 172510.1103/PhysRevB.46.1725 ↗
27. Al-Rawi · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 66 · 16543910.1103/PhysRevB.66.165439 ↗