journal article·2011-01

Sliding Wear Studies on Aluminium–Copper Composites

S. Madhusudan, M. M. M. Sarcar, N. R. M. R. Bhargava

Composite Interfaces· Volume 18· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Metal–metal composites are prepared by dispersing copper particulates in an aluminium matrix using stir-cast technique. Behaviour of the same is compared with the alloy having similar composition. Wear behaviour of the alloy in the cast condition is superior to the homogenized condition, though cast structure exhibit low hardness compared to the other. This is attributed to the easy crack propagation along the CuAl2 precipitates in the homogenized condition, compared to the grain boundary in the as-cast structure. Wear properties of the resultant composite are superior to the alloy. Effect of particulate composition is studied by varying the copper concentration between 5 and 15 wt%. Composites with high copper content exhibit better wear resistance than the dilute ones, which is attributed to the increased hardness due to large population of intermetallics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sir CR Reddy College of Engineering, Eluru — 534 007, India;, Email: madhusudan_sunanda@rediffmail.com

b Department of Mechanical Engineering, AU College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam — 530 003, India

c Department of Metallurgical Engineering, AU College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam — 530 003, India

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Surappa , M. K. 2003.Aluminium Matrix Composites: Challenges and OpportunitiesVol. 28, 319–334. Sadhana, India Parts 1 and 210.1007/BF02717141 ↗
2. Wlodarczyk-Fligier A. · J. Achievements Mater. Manufact. Engng · 2007 · 21 · 55
3. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2003.10.03010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2003.10.030 ↗
4. Miracle D. B. · 2000
5. Baetz J. G. · Aerospace America · 1998 · 14
6. Tenny , D. R. Sykes , G. F. and Bowles , D. E. 1985.Proc. 3rd Eur. Sympos. Space Craft Mater. Space Environ, ESA SP-232 9–21. The Netherlands Composite materials for space structures
7. Wlodarczyk-Fligier A. · J. Achievements Mater. Manufact. Engng · 2008 · 27 · 99
8. 10.1016/S0261-3069(00)00077-710.1016/S0261-3069(00)00077-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00639-710.1016/S0924-0136(00)00639-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00316-110.1016/S0043-1648(00)00316-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00067-910.1016/S0924-0136(99)00067-9 ↗
12. 10.1023/A:101792181350310.1023/A:1017921813503 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00216-810.1016/S0043-1648(02)00216-8 ↗
14. Mohan S. · Wear · 2002 · 93 · 1245
15. 10.1016/0043-1648(95)90172-810.1016/0043-1648(95)90172-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/0043-1648(94)90261-510.1016/0043-1648(94)90261-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00408-810.1016/S0921-5093(03)00408-8 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0265189410.1007/BF02651894 ↗
19. Singh M. · 2003
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.04.02510.1016/j.jallcom.2008.04.025 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11661-998-0324-610.1007/s11661-998-0324-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/0956-716X(90)90353-I10.1016/0956-716X(90)90353-I ↗