journal article·2002-01

Pressure infiltration of liquid aluminium into packed SiC particulate with a bimodal size distribution

J.M Molina, R.A Saravanan, R Arpón, C Garcı́a-Cordovilla, E Louis, J Narciso

Acta Materialia· Volume 50· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract High volume fraction composites were produced by infiltrating liquid aluminium into preforms made by mixing and packing SiC particles with average diameters of 170 and 16 μm. The maximum particle volume fraction (0.74) was attained for a mixture having 67% of coarse particles. The variation of the preform compactness with the percentage of coarse particles can be reasonably well understood in terms of a simple model. The experimental results indicate that the threshold pressure is mainly determined by the local compactness of fine particles, a result which is shown to be compatible with the model used to calculate the particle volume fraction. The permeability of the compacts was also evaluated by means of pressureless infiltration with an organic liquid (polyethylene glycol) and the results were compared with those obtained with aluminium. The two data sets qualitatively agree for low percentages of coarse particles. However, while the permeability obtained with the organic liquid shows a minimum for preforms having the maximum compactness (roughly half the value obtained for fine particles), in the case of aluminium, the permeability for that preform (and others having a compactness around the maximum) was significantly higher. This was ascribed to the pushing of particles during pressurised infiltration of aluminium, triggered by particle segregation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Bauxite Residue and Utilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Lefranc · 1999
2. Frear · J Metals · 1999 · 51 · 22
3. Elomari · Compos Sci Technol · 1998 · 58 · 36910.1016/S0266-3538(97)00124-3 ↗
4. Sepúlveda · 1997 · vol. 4 · 393
5. Jech · 1997 · 90
6. Garcı́a-Cordovilla · Acta mater · 1999 · 47 · 446110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00318-3 ↗
7. Asthana · Process Adv Mater · 1992 · 2 · 1
8. Mortensen · Int Mater Rev · 1992 · 37 · 10110.1179/imr.1992.37.1.101 ↗
9. Guyon · 1987 · 71
10. Spaepen · Acta metall · 1975 · 23 · 72910.1016/0001-6160(75)90056-5 ↗
11. Bideau · 1985 · 76
12. Lee · J Mater Res · 1996 · 11 · 280410.1557/JMR.1996.0355 ↗
13. Standish · Powder Technol · 1987 · 53 · 6910.1016/0032-5910(87)80126-2 ↗
14. Yu · Powder Technol · 1988 · 55 · 17110.1016/0032-5910(88)80101-3 ↗
15. Yu · J Am Ceram Soc · 1992 · 75 · 276510.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb05502.x ↗
16. Saravanan · Scripta mater · 2001 · 44 · 96510.1016/S1359-6462(00)00688-6 ↗
17. Pamies · Scripta metall · 1984 · 18 · 86910.1016/0036-9748(84)90251-5 ↗
18. Garcı́a-Cordovilla · J Mater Sci · 1986 · 21 · 278710.1007/BF00551490 ↗
19. Goicoechea · J Mater Sci · 1992 · 27 · 524710.1007/BF02403824 ↗
20. 1976
21. Candan · Scripta mater · 1998 · 38 · 99910.1016/S1359-6462(97)00553-8 ↗
22. Laurent · J Mater Sci · 1987 · 22 · 24410.1007/BF01160579 ↗
23. Alonso · Metall Trans A · 1993 · 24A · 142310.1007/BF02668210 ↗
24. Pastor-Blas · Surf Interface Anal · 1998 · 26 · 38510.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(19980501)26:5<385::AID-SIA384>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
25. Fraser · J Geol · 1935 · 43 · 91010.1086/624388 ↗
26. McGeary · J Am Ceram Soc · 1961 · 44 · 51310.1111/j.1151-2916.1961.tb13716.x ↗
27. Marmur · Powder Technol · 1985 · 44 · 24910.1016/0032-5910(85)85006-3 ↗
28. Westman · J Am Ceram Soc · 1936 · 19 · 12710.1111/j.1151-2916.1936.tb19809.x ↗