Response of NiTi shape memory alloy at high strain rate: A systematic investigation of temperature effects on tension–compression asymmetry
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A systematic experimental investigation into the effects of temperature on the stress–strain response of NiTi (55.6 wt.% Ni) shape memory alloy at high strain rate was conducted and compared with the behavior at quasi-static strain rate. Dynamic compression and tension tests, to total strains of 16–24%, were performed at high strain rate (∼1200/s) and under quasi-static conditions at temperatures from −196 to 400 °C. Since the superelastic range for the NiTi alloy used in this work is Af (2 °C) 0 °C and the (thermally induced) martensite phase at lower temperatures. The results indicate differences in the stress–strain response of thermally induced martensite and stress-induced martensite, in terms of plateau stress characteristics and critical stress (as determined by 0.2% strain offset). The observations illustrate a complex interplay of test temperature, stress state (compression and tension) and martensite type (thermally induced vs. stress induced) that lead to the asymmetry in compression vs. tension response of the shape memory alloy in both quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. This asymmetry was captured in the variation of critical stress with temperature that exhibited a three-stage character, with the critical stress being higher in compression than in tension. These findings have significant implications for the understanding and exploitation of the underlining functional characteristics of shape memory alloys, especially at high strain rates.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Chang · Trans AIME · 1951 · 189 · 47
2. Tadaki · Annu Rev Mater Sci · 1988 · 18 · 2510.1146/annurev.ms.18.080188.000325 ↗
3. Wayman · Prog Mater Sci · 1992 · 36 · 20310.1016/0079-6425(92)90009-V ↗
4. Van Humbeeck · Adv Eng Mater · 2001 · 3 · 83710.1002/1527-2648(200111)3:11<837::AID-ADEM837>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
5. Fugazza · 2003 · 141
6. 1998
7. Bhattacharya · 2003
8. Buehler · J Appl Phys · 1963 · 34 · 147510.1063/1.1729603 ↗
9. Rizner · J Inst Met · 1966 · 94 · 169
10. Wasilewski · Metall Trans · 1971 · 2 · 297310.1007/BF02662662 ↗
11. Miyazaki · Scripta Metall · 1981 · 15 · 28710.1016/0036-9748(81)90346-X ↗
12. Shaw · J Mech Phys Solids · 1995 · 43 · 124310.1016/0022-5096(95)00024-D ↗
13. Kobus · Sonderbaende der Praktischen Metallographie · 2000 · 31 · 305
14. Qidwai · 2003
15. Lin · JSME Int J · 1996 · 39 · 117
16. Tobushi · Mech Mater · 1998 · 30 · 14110.1016/S0167-6636(98)00041-6 ↗
17. Entemeyer · Int J Plasticity · 2000 · 16 · 126910.1016/S0749-6419(00)00010-3 ↗
18. Gall · Int J Plasticity · 1999 · 15 · 6910.1016/S0749-6419(98)00060-6 ↗
19. Gall · Trans ASME · 1999 · 1217 · 28
20. Chen · Int J Solids Struct · 2001 · 38 · 898910.1016/S0020-7683(01)00165-2 ↗
21. Miller · J Phys IV France · 2000 · 10 · 34110.1051/jp4:2000957 ↗
22. Millet · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 92 · 310710.1063/1.1498877 ↗
23. Liu · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 39 · 104710.1016/S1359-6462(98)00241-3 ↗
24. Liu · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 41 · 127310.1016/S1359-6462(99)00299-7 ↗
25. Liu · Mater Sci Eng A · 1999 · 273–275 · 67910.1016/S0921-5093(99)00348-2 ↗
26. Liu · Philos Mag A · 2000 · 80 · 193510.1080/01418610008219095 ↗
27. Liu · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 432510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00112-8 ↗
28. Liu · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 41 · 8910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00058-5 ↗
29. Liu · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 246110.1080/01418610208240046 ↗
30. Liu · Philos Mag Lett · 2002 · 82 · 51110.1080/09500830210153869 ↗
31. 1985 · 190
32. Frew · Exp Mech · 2002 · 42 · 9310.1007/BF02411056 ↗
33. Gray · 2000 · vol. 8 · 462
34. Follansbee · Trans ASME J Eng Mater Technol · 1983 · 105 · 6110.1115/1.3225620 ↗
35. Plietsch · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 241710.1016/S1359-6454(96)00354-0 ↗
36. Gall · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 120310.1016/S1359-6454(98)00432-7 ↗
37. Orgeas · J Phys IV · 1995 · 5 · 605
38. Orgeas · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 557910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00167-0 ↗
39. Sehitoglu · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 331110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00153-1 ↗
40. Jacobus · Metall Mater Trans A · 1996 · 27 · 306610.1007/BF02663855 ↗
41. Brinson · J Mech Phys Solids · 2004 · 52 · 154910.1016/j.jmps.2004.01.001 ↗
42. Huseyin Sehitoglu · Metall Mater Trans A · 2003 · 34 · 510.1007/s11661-003-0203-0 ↗
43. Zheng · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 66510.1080/01418610208243195 ↗
44. Klassen-Neklyudova · 1964
45. Garber · Zhur Eksptl I Theoret Fiz · 1938 · 8 · 746
46. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
47. Boucher · Acta Metall · 1972 · 20 · 58110.1016/0001-6160(72)90013-2 ↗
48. Mahajan · Philos Mag · 1971 · 23 · 78110.1080/14786437108216988 ↗
49. Liu · Solid Mech Appl · 2002 · 101 · 37
50. Gao · J Phys IV · 2003 · 112 · 82710.1051/jp4:20031009 ↗
51. Liu · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 64510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00376-0 ↗
52. Sittner · J Eng Mater Technol · 1999 · 121 · 4810.1115/1.2815999 ↗
53. Zheng · Proc SPIE · 2000 · 3992 · 56010.1117/12.388239 ↗